Jump to content

Jase

Member
  • Posts

    47,956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    530
  • Country

    Austria

Everything posted by Jase

  1. That's probably because Marina played hard ball over Alonso/Emerson, which forced Conte to look elsewhere. Anyway the main point is, Conte seems to have a thing for old, average, over-the-hill players as seen with many of his transfers at Inter. If he had still been here, you can bet that we wouldn't have signed Werner, Ziyech, Havertz, Chilwell etc.
  2. Obstacles keep blocking Hudson-Odoi’s path back into Chelsea and England teams https://theathletic.com/2189027/2020/11/10/hudson-odoi-limited-chelsea-matches/?source=emp_shared_article It’s fair to say Callum Hudson-Odoi has had more enjoyable birthdays than his 20th on Saturday, when Frank Lampard let his third substitution go unused in the final minutes of Chelsea’s 4-1 dismantling of Sheffield United at Stamford Bridge. Then, in the hours after the game, details of a COVID-19 restriction-breaching meal with team-mate Fikayo Tomori were leaked from his private Snapchat account to a newspaper. Lampard’s decision not to bring on Hudson-Odoi against Chris Wilder’s men is more understandable in context: sources have told The Athletic the winger had a slight knock and although he was ready to play if called upon, doing so would probably have constituted an unnecessary risk with victory secure. What is harder to explain is why he has been relatively peripheral throughout a disjointed start to the 2020-21 season. On the surface, there doesn’t seem to be much of an issue. Hudson-Odoi has featured in nine of Chelsea’s 13 matches across all competitions. But only four of those appearances have been as a starter, only one of which came in the Premier League (the 4-0 win over Crystal Palace last month). Many of his cameos have been brief and his total of 423 minutes played is only slightly more than that of Hakim Ziyech (373 minutes), who wasn’t fit to make his debut following a summer move from Ajax until the week after that Palace game. You might argue Hudson-Odoi’s level of involvement has been reasonable so far: he is a winger barely out of his teens competing to play for an elite club who signed three new attackers at a combined cost of more than £150 million in the summer transfer window. Kai Havertz, Timo Werner and Ziyech were all bought to be key components of the team Lampard is building, and part of that process involves giving all of them extended minutes on the pitch to adapt to their new roles, team-mates and opponents. Heading into this international break, the Premier League table certainly offers no riposte to Lampard’s approach. Chelsea are three points off top spot, with their only defeat coming at the hands of champions Liverpool in September. A more consistent approach to tactics and team selection has yielded four consecutive wins across all competitions and six clean sheets in eight games. Werner and Ziyech, in particular, are already making decisive impacts in the final third. Hudson-Odoi, meanwhile, could be forgiven for wondering if his best window to take a significant leap forward at Chelsea this season has already closed. He went into 2020-21 as the only available true winger in the squad, with both Christian Pulisic and Ziyech injured and Lampard favouring Werner as a central striker in place of Tammy Abraham. Yet in the opening weeks, Lampard instead opted to deploy Mason Mount in wide areas as he attempted to balance his new-look team. The visit of the Championship side Barnsley for a Carabao Cup tie in September was presented as Hudson-Odoi’s big chance to impress. “We’ve played Timo Werner out wide, but the only natural winger who is fit at the minute is Callum,” Lampard said ahead of that game. “He has to show in every minute, on and off the ball, what he can do for the team and at the minute, that’s the position Callum is at. He had an early breakthrough in his career because of his talent, he’s had an injury and now I want to see him flourish again.” Hudson-Odoi underwhelmed on the night, however, even as Chelsea won 6-0, giving off the understandable impression of a player trying too hard for his own good. Three days later, he made a much better impact, combining impressively with Havertz to score after being brought on in his favoured left-wing position as a half-time substitute against West Bromwich Albion. Lampard rewarded him with starts against Tottenham Hotspur in the Carabao Cup and Palace in the league, providing him with some momentum heading into last month’s international break. Pulisic’s return to full fitness changed everything. The American came into the starting XI at Hudson-Odoi’s expense for the 3-3 draw with Southampton as the season resumed after the October internationals and kept his place in the subsequent games against Sevilla and Manchester United, with Hudson-Odoi clocking a total of one minute from the bench across the three matches. Lampard’s desire to give his most dazzling attacker last season an opportunity to play his way back into prime form was understandable, but the nature of his relegation only served to underline how stiff a challenge Hudson-Odoi faces to consolidate any upward progress in this squad. Having marked his fourth start of the season with his second goal against Krasnodar in the Champions League, Hudson-Odoi had reason to hope Lampard would call upon him when Pulisic tweaked a hamstring during the pre-match warm-up against Burnley at Turf Moor three days later. Instead, it was Werner — initially given a well-earned rest after a heavy run of minutes — who came into the starting line-up to the left of Abraham and Ziyech in an expansive 4-3-3. Chelsea arguably produced their three most complete performances of the season in the week heading into this international break, led by that dynamic Werner-Abraham-Ziyech front line. Hudson-Odoi was involved as a substitute against both Burnley and Rennes, but came on with the score 3-0 in each game. It’s not always easy for an attacker to impress in a situation where cruising to the final whistle over the final 15 minutes or so is all that is required. By the time club football resumes on November 21, Havertz’s period of isolation after contracting COVID-19 is likely to be over, and Pulisic will be available again sooner rather than later. In the meantime, Hudson-Odoi will play out the international break as the headline name for England’s under-21s while many of his peers at youth level, at Chelsea and elsewhere, make up Gareth Southgate’s senior squad. It’s not easy to see a path to fulfilling his ambition of playing at next summer’s European Championship as things stand. There have been no indications yet that Hudson-Odoi has allowed his frustration to show. He is keeping his head down and focusing on maintaining a high level of performance and fitness in training. It is understood no explanations have been sought as to why he remains at the bottom of the pecking order out wide, and none has been offered beyond Lampard’s public challenge ahead of the Barnsley game. When he plays, his attacking metrics stand up well to comparison. It is a small sample size of data, but that’s kind of the point. Hudson-Odoi occupies a strange place now. We are barely a month on from Bayern Munich, reigning European champions, presenting Chelsea with an offer of a season-long loan with an option to make the move permanent for £70 million next summer. It wasn’t an obligation to buy, but it was still a startling offer within the context of a transfer market in which most of the continent’s leading clubs were warier than ever of committing to huge deals — and a timely reminder that Hudson-Odoi’s talent is admired far beyond west London. Chelsea rationalised turning it down by insisting that Hudson-Odoi remained integral to their plans, and that he would be given the opportunity by Lampard to spread his wings. This is an elite talent they have moulded at their Cobham HQ since the age of seven, nursed back from a serious injury and committed to a long-term contract that made him one of the highest-paid teenage footballers in the world. Fulfilling that potential at Stamford Bridge should be regarded as the dream scenario by all parties. That deal, which runs until June 2024, gives Chelsea the control and security they lacked when Hudson-Odoi was hoping to impress Lampard’s predecessor Maurizio Sarri and Bayern first made their interest known. But as long as his development path remains curiously fragmented, don’t expect the speculation about his future to go away.
  3. This is exactly what I meant when these smaller clubs are just sticking to their own agenda and not looking at the bigger picture... https://global.espn.com/football/english-premier-league/story/4231377/reintroducing-five-substitutes-would-hurt-premier-league-integrity-sheffield-united-ceo
  4. Was Daily Mail running low on stories? That story was already out in March - https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/jose-mourinho-all-time-best-xi-cristiano-ronaldo-no-room-man-utd-paul-pogba-a4401881.html
  5. Ziyech and Willian may be different players but when it comes to level of productivity, there's no debate which one is better. Even Arsenal fans are already experiencing the same frustration we had with Willian.
  6. Exactly. Their argument that 'having 5 subs benefits the bigger clubs' may be true but that is also stupid and ignorant because the point here is to protect the players' wellbeing - physically and mentally - more than anything else. Other leagues as well as the Champions League and Europa League have the rule in place with next to no protest whatsoever and yet, the Premier League smaller clubs are making noise about it. Furthermore, it's not like the smaller clubs play the bigger clubs every single week. They will be playing teams in and around them most of the time and these teams have similar level of resources. And those clubs that objected against having 5 subs are also hypocrites. When the season restarted last season in June, majority of them agreed to the rule because they had to play every 3-4 days. Now that we are sort of back to a normal schedule, especially for the smaller sides where they only play once a week, those sides objected against it. It's stupid, especially when injuries are higher than ever and it's not like the 5 subs rule has made the sport worse either. I see managers like Dean Smith said he objected against the 5 subs because it benefits the bigger clubs but am sure if he had been in the other position, managing one of the bigger clubs, he would have been complaining about "why aren't we having 5 subs!?". All these clubs only care for whatever dumb agenda they have and not the players.
  7. Think they are allowed to travel but only via private flight...
  8. Players' union adds to pressure for five substitutions in Premier League - https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/nov/09/players-union-add-to-pressure-for-premier-league-vote-on-five-substitutions-football Those lesser Premier League sides are really idiots and ignorant.
  9. Arteta's problem right now seems to be the opposite of Lampard's right now or what Lampard used to have (hope the recent improvement isn't a false dawn). Arteta looks capable of setting up Arsenal to be defensively sound and with a defined structure way of playing (one might say it's too structured based on recent evidence!) but makes them too blunt in attack while Lampard is/was incapable of setting us up to be defensively solid, have little to no structure but makes us decent going forward.
  10. You forgot to mention 'form'. As well as James has done recently, he's still only 20 years old (will turn 21 next month) and would probably hit some kind of rough patch along the way at this point. Another factor on the use of James and Azpi this season could also come down to who we are playing and how we will set up. Using James against Burnley and Sheffield United was the right move because we were always gonna to dominate them. But say if we go play Man City, Spurs or Liverpool and away from home, Lampard may opt for Azpi instead for example.
  11. Yes, I don't believe Azpi will go to Spurs or Arsenal but for argument's sake, we're talking about Azpi who is already 31 years old, not 21. He might still be able to perform at a decent level but I don't even think Mourinho would do what you said there, especially for a full back position.
  12. Why would he go from our bench to Spurs' bench? Spurs, after all, already has Doherty.
  13. No no no, pretty sure it wasn't that. His goals contribution was used as an excuse, even though he rarely scores in a back 4 especially.
  14. Pulisic has gone to the USMNT camp...
  15. WHY DID YOU HAVE TO ASK THIS!? 😭
×
×
  • Create New...