communicate

I think it depend on how Lamp want to setup his midfield. Post covid break, I feel like Lamp want to play two aggressive cm who atack the box in front of a single dm. Is jorgi or Gilmour the right guy for this role, maybe not. In term of build up, against Watford, i feel like Kante doesn't really try to receive the ball, it feel like it is christensen job to build from the back. Maybe I was wrong but that is what I felt.

A lot of people criticize Lamp with favoring kante. I personally don't understand the criticism. I feel like everyone favor jorgi or gillmour as our dm. The question is how do you cover for their weaknesses, both are quite slow.

I wish i took a screen shot of it. I don't remember where i saw it but he has high key pass, successful tackle rate

Btw stat is useless without watching how they play. Based on stats, Emerson is one of the best lb in Europe. I mean he can't even beat alonso who is wb in our team.

With Kante starting 3/4 games in a row, it is quite obvious what Lamp want to build. He want to play two aggressive 8/10 in front of a dm. This mean that dm need to be first and foremost excellent at defending. Otherwise you need to play inverted fb and Guardiola football which i don't want to touch.

Why? Played well.

So bringing your most physical and aerially dominant player help against set pieces

I don't think playing as deeper midfielder workwith Mount. Mount is excellent at filing up gap and running the channel. He is much better playing higher so he can use his running to destabilize defense

CHO will not score as many as Greenwood. Greenwood is natural striker with excellent finishing skill

Just relax with CHO, he is very good. But he is still very young, he will go up and down. He just need to stay healthy first

Rashford is 23 with 4 years of first team experience. He is not a youth player. Messi was playing at all time level when he was 23

Greenwood finishing is better than Rashford, he can finish with both feet

The question with this united team is very simple. Is martial good enough as st not as lw? 2nd Matic is 32 and as Chelsea fans we all know he tend to drop off in 2nd half of the season. And lastly pogba, will he be discipline playing this deeper role for 30+ games

He won't play if Greenwood playing this way,

If Alonso has pace, he will be one of the best lf in the world

Mason Mount as dm??

Even with all player defending corner, city is still vulnerable from set pieces. In games that i watched they are so freaking dominant, it doesn't even matter. The best way of how they defend set pieces is by not conceding them in the 1st place.

Not useless, people love Pulisic, deservedly so, but if you watched puli playing on the right early in the season, you will never say Willian is useless.

I wish selling player is that easy

If Willian is the best performer in the game, your team is in trouble. He is a functional player. We need our attacker= LW, ST and AM to bring number for us.

For me number wise with Willian is a bonus. In a perfect world, I want my winger to score and create goals but if he can't he need to provide other stuff and Willian is pretty good at that.

Willian will not suddenly have better number, in final 3rd he is quite poor and more importantly he is right footed playing on the right. If you want your wide player to score and create , play him on the inverted side. In term of Willian not being the 1st choice, it is up to the other player to grab his rw spot. Pedro can certainly do it but it looks like he is done with us. Pulisic was dreadful when he played on the right. CHO cannot stay healthy. I said it early in the season, i don't think we should renew Willian because we have CHO, but he need to show that he can replace him.

City has never been strong at indirect set pieces (short player everywhere) but pool is very good.

They are the ONLY team that have that many top class attacking player because their finance is crazy. No team will sign cancelo as backup rb other than city.

For Christensen.