That would be stuipid. Either Hazard should have his red card revoked or he should get a long ban. Why? Because if he indeed did nothing wrong, the red card is incorrect to give. I can understand the red card being given because the ball boy dived, and the ref obviousley gave it to prevent the stadium to go nuts, but after hand when the situation is reviewed and they come to the conclusion that he didnt hit the boy and whatnot, why would he still have the red card? It just doesnt make sense.