didierforever

moses would be as 6th AM. playing a total of 500 minutes in the season. we dont need moses. we do NEED lukaku. not just cos he is HG but cos of our striker options. going into the season with costa as the 1st striker and DD and FT as the only back-up is not just stupid but downright suicidal. pogba? how does pogba make us any better? does he score 20 goals a season? we dont need pogba. we have cesc, matic, rambo, mvg. adding pogba spoils the dynamics. as does selling lukaku.

Love it, love it, absolutely loving it!!! Boga, brown, baker, solanke probablt bamford in a couple of seasons. Ake and chirstensen already there. Expecting atleast 2/3/4 of them to make it big. Suprising that their is no mention of RLC!!!

Another HG player?? Who exactly are u talking about?People so easily speak of transfers like its a child's work. Do tell me who would be lukaku's replaxement? This HG player that we are talking abiut!!!

Sellong lukaku COMPLICATES the problem rather than solving it. If we sell him then3 strikers are non-HG 5 AMs are non-HG. atleast 3 CM/DM are non-HG. 3 defenders are non HG. All 3 GKs are non HG. Which means we will still have to get rid of mikel and romeu and play baker as the 5th DM and boga as the 6th AM. We don't have the luxury of selling lukaku. It has to be torres and /or mikel.

I don't believe that price tag for a second. We are desperate to sell him and know how big a hindrance his salary will be. I think we will sell him for half of it.

Its not stupidity to think that bamford WILL be better than lukaku.But saying lukaku is as bad as bamford and torres cos he scores half his goals in pens is ... well...

in short, u want us to be like arsenal. tell me what has arsenal won it the last 10 years? an FA cup? i am sorry dude, but it seems that roman, the board, JOSE and the club as whole put more precendence on success rather than the future of players like mceachran and kakuta who have been said to have a problem with even training. but u know what, jose has just included ake and andreas in the first team squads. 2 youth players. while saying that people like bamford, chalobah might be a part in coming years. but hell to that, we should just send a team of U-21s for the PL.

CR is better than messi - opinion. djemba djemba is better than messi - not an opinion. downright stupidity. its fine though. in the name of "opinion" we can literally say anything we want to. though i love it that u have a problem with lukaku's mentality but are willing to shell out 30mil for balo. BRILLIANT!!! how suprising though that the striker said to be as good as bamford is actually being rumored to be on RM's shopping list!!! weird!!! anyways, i RESPECT your opinion. so bye-bye.

lukaku was MOTM cos he scored and assisted and changed the GAME!!! replacement? better replacement? who? please tell me who? remy? the one relegated with qpr and a below mid table newcastle loanee bony? who would easily cost 20mil pound and is hardly a better player or has a higher ceiling oh wait, u think bamford is better than lukaku. so probably vanwolfswinkel would be a good replacement!!!

baker was used as a CAM by jose but i would say that was cos of our lack of options upfront with none of oscar, willian, hazard available. right now we have 4 places done for the CM/DM spots (cesc, matic, rambo, mvg). we have the option of romeu and mikel. if we choose nat over them, it will solely be cos of HG. would rather take baker if thats the case.

not even close to ready for us. would rather take baker over him.

i dint compare dzeko to lukaku but i gave u an analogy of how useful the 2nd or even the 3rd strikers are!!!! having DD and torres as those 2 will be nothing short of suicide. dzeko will be our 2nd striker but since we dont have dzeko or bony or balo or mandzukic, we should take our next best thing to be our 2nd striker who is ROMELU LUKAKU. lukaku was as poor as belgium were in the 1st 2 matches. he dint play the 3rd match. was the MOTM in the 4th and one of the better players against argentina. "he cribs a lot"... i have had enough of this BS. you know what, the only person whose opinion i care about is JOSE. and guess what, he is willing to give lukaku a chance. our manager, JOSE MOURINHO, probably the best manager in the world, thinks he is good enough. dont need to read childish and repetitive views about lukaku. "his mentality is fragile" yet our manager is willing to give him such a massive responsiblity. you can "dislike" him all you want (and even sprout nonsense like he just scores from pens, or mentality is fragile etc etc), at the end of the day, he is a chelsea player and a massive prospect, one which jose thinks is ready and good enough.

did u see the goal where lukaku goes past jamie? or his run against USA in the WC! lukaku running at a tired defence is PERFECT for closing out games. those clips are just examples. lukaku does create something out of nothing specially when the opponent is chasing. as for him scoring 50-50 chances, it should not even be up for debate.

will wallace and traore play? the best chance for wallace to make an impression.

creates something out of nothing and in the other one scores from a half chance. costa is better than lukaku, torres, 36 year old DD and bamford. so does that mean we dont need any of them? every striker goes thru a lean patch. costa will too. even in a good patch their might be matches where we are tied at 0-0 and need a second striker to come in and change the game, lukaku would be perfect for that. remeber his performance against pool (for wba) in the 3-0 win when he came off the bench, or his performance against usa in the WC!!! dzeko is no where as good as aguero in anything yet being the 3rd striker, he was one of the main reasons for city winning the PL. thats what good options do for u. ps - a serious question. did u just go to whoscored.com and see lukaku's weaknesses listed as "passing" and "defensive contribution" and simply reproduced it here??? cos any1 who knows lukaku would easily say that his passing is fine, but his main weakness is his first touch which is probably championship-striker level.

right now moses' value is real low. i remember last summer there was talk of martinez wanting him at everton for 10mil. he is HG (which means an extra 2/3 million anyways). i mean even stewart "useless" downing was sold for 6mil pound. moses is definitely better than him. there are already reports that villa want him on loan, so i would prefer if he goes on loan and maybe increases his value.

window so far ins: costa - 32mil pounds cesc - 27mil pounds luis - 15.8mil pounds total = 74.8mil pounds outs: luiz - 50mil pounds ba - 4.8mil pounds pva - 1.5mil pounds lamps - free transfer etoo - free transfer cole - free transfer hilario - free transfer total = 56.3 mil pounds total spending = 18.5 hopefully we can sell some more of our deadwood kakuta- 1mil pound marin - 2mil pounds mikel - 5mil pounds ryan - 6mil pounds torres - 10mil pounds. our squad is well formed GKs - cech, thibaut, mark defenders - JT (HG), GC (HG), azpi, luis, iva, zouma (U-21), ake (U-21), christensen (U-21) CM/DM - matic, cesc (HG), rambo, mvg, romeu AMs - hazard, schurrle, willian, oscar, salah, boga (U-21) strikers - costa, lukaku (U-21), DD.

He is.no worse than Lukaku - backica Lukaku scored half of his goals from penalty. If Torres scored all our penalty last season he would be double figure too but that wouldn't make him better than he is. - sherry33 i dont see attitude anywhere? these guys straightforward are doubting lukaku's ability!!!

i mean i myself would love to see bamford make it big here!!! but someone who has played in the league1 and championship in the last 2 seasons and has still been outscored by lukaku (33 to 29) while lukaku played for wba which finished 8th in the PL and everton that finished 5th in PL and were within touching distance of CL spot is been said to be not as good!!! i mean seriously there is something wrong going on here!!!

lukaku's wba goals pool-1 reading-1 newcastle-1 sunderland-1(pen) swansea-1 norwich-1 fulham-1 readin-2 pool-1 sunderland-2 (one pen) swansea-1 soton-1 united-3 17 goals, 2 pens all in all, in the last 2 seasons on loan, lukaku has scored a total of 33 goals (16+17) and 2 of them have been penalties. "half his goals are penalties"... :lol: i still cant get over this statement!!!!

oh really? so baines died? or was he dropped from everton? all of lukaku's goal for everton whu -1 newcastle -2 city-1 villa -1 pool -2 stoke-1 soton-1 whu-1 swansea-1 cardiff-1 newcastle -1 arsenal-1 city-1 fa cup- arsenal-1 all in all 15 goals last season in PL and 1 in fa cup and NOT ONE OF THEM FROM PENALTIES!!! "scores half his goals from the penalty"... atleast get your facts right man!!! its one thing not to like a certain player but another to say absolutely idiotic things about him which are just WRONG!!!

no transfer rumor?

Should not the belgium also be availablr?

Great signing for ATM. I can see them givong a title fight once more

DAFUQ!!!!! united sell bebe to benfica for 2.4 mil £. We sold ba for barely double that value. That's sick!!!