didierforever

should be going for him. even if it means a cech + 30/35mil deal!!! would suit both the parties.

ohhh... how did that confidence pan out when we sold sturridge to pool? and they almost won the league?

Sky sports are sayong that the bookmakers have suspended betting. And that martinez is confident. Thats it. That's all I can find.

So Still nothing on sky and bbc. People basing there opinion on dailystar!!! Dailystar of all tabloids.

Go back a couple of weeks and see exactly what articles and what sources people posted to show that lukaku is leaving. Why not the other way around.

personally, i would love that!!!! hope you are right!!!

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/romelu-lukaku-everton-transfer-looking-3932968 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/romelu-lukaku-latest-chelsea-threaten-to-scrap-move-to-everton-with-30m-price-tag--reports-9636971.html

what the fuck does "time to write a new chapter" mean??? after his endless straight forward and ridiculous PCs, he chooses THIS time to talk in riddles. atleast he is learning.

selling lukaku for 30mil and luiz for 50mil, with clearing out deadwood like pva(1.5 mil £), ba(4.5mil £) and hopefully kakuta(1mil £), bertrand (6mil £), marin (2mil £) and mikel (4mil £), we get a lot of leeway to deal with FFP. we can afford to take a hit on torres by selling him for cut-price (5-10mil) so that teams like ATM can deal with his wages (they did the same exact thing with david villa last year). and like u said, with PSG interested in cech and extremely desperate to sell cavani and lavezzi to fund maria, we can get a deal like 30mil + cech or 35mil+cech for cavani which would be massive if we are able to sell lukaku for 30mil.

With psg ready to sell cavani, if we sell him for 30mil £, I expect us to buy cavani

Even if that is right (considering torres does hold the ball up cos everytime he touches it I either see the ball to the opposition or torres sprawled on the floor with the ball inadvertently going back to the oppostition), just tell m e how many PL goals did torres score using his hokd up play or just tell me how many goals chelsea scored using torees' hold up play. Lukaku is 21, even if his play with the back to the goal is not as it should be, he is still a massive threat and definitely more than torres.

Still hate him. Maybe not as much as before but its still there. But nonetheless, its just obvious that he will be our main man this season. He will be the player whose performances would have us winning the league or simply folding.

Van ginkel and salah are 21 but don't count as U-21 according to PL rules as far as I know off it.

Just visited the sturridge thread. DEJA-VU!!! probably worse as lukaku WILL be bought by city/united. A direct title competitor in coming years. Atleast with sturridge we can be sure that he won't challenge for the title for the coming future.

If lukaku goes, he will be the 5th CM ahead of romeu.

What??? Lukaku was a HG player. And we are selling himSo if anything it makes a worse situation for mikel. 3gks (cech, thibaut, mark) 3 defenders (qzpi, iva, luis) 3 Cm (rambo, matic, mvg) 5 ams (hazard, schurrle, willian, oscar, salah) 3 strikers (costa, dd, torres) We are already 17 non hg players full. The quota is done. What's worse is due to this lukaku shambolic deal, we losr romeu too and he wil have to go on loan. If lukaku is sold, cech/mikel is also as good as gone.

This.

Where habe they gotten better? Seriously?Caballero is a good signing for them cos he is a decent back up GK. courtois is a redundant move cos cech is not joe hart who got dropped for mistake after mistake. Fernando is a squad signing but something they dearly needed. A good back up to yaya-fernandinho rather than falling straight back to garcia/rodwell. Mangala is a no-brainer. I can't see them losing to the likes of cardiff (or burnley this year as analogy) and have a pathetic away form to start with. We had a 4 point gap on top of 2 wins over them to begin with. We had to win against them this window to lessen the gap. And nowhere did I say that they have performed better than us in the window. We have been downright exceptoonal in this window so far. Getting costa, fab, luis and Dd for a net expenditure of 20mil (or less) is a great deal. But that doea not mean I can't say that city tok have gotten better, cos they have.

thats the point. if we have gotten better, so have they! even they have improved their weaknesses (all 3 of them in my opinion). no doubt it will be a very very close title race, and to win those u need to have an edge. we lose that bit of edge by selling lukaku. ps - yaya has confirmed his stay at city if i remember correctly.

in m opinion, there is only one IF. IF we go into the season with a striker force of costa/dd/torres,then i cant see us winning the league.

u could have bothered to have read the line before that too..

each to his own then. just dont see costa/torred/DD as a PL winning combo. city barely won the league with aguero/negredo/dzeko and jovetic. u need good strikers to win leagues. its costa's first season and he might struggle (i hope not) and even if he gets 15-20, we would need one of DD/torres getting 10. dont see that happening. but each to his own!!

30/5/2013 dude.

sure. and i will have a 3some with kat dennings and natalie dormer.

how do i ignore them when there is only one thread alive on the forum discussing the same stupid thing. also, i dint get angry, its more u who has taken me ridiculing di marzio to your heart. i mean how many sources and how many articles have been published since june? its been 2 months (and 1 month of transfer window) and yet lukaku is STILL here. i am just sensing a pattern. moreover with our HG players boundary and the fact that we will be left with DD and torres as back up, this move makes as little sense as u like. but as u said, no one gets it 100% right. so that is all i need to know. there is jack-squat on sky and BBC which are what i would call reliable. if there is news on there, i ll know the truth.