didierforever

if u know what he is, why are you replying to him. infact why the hell is anybody replying to him?

Villa also joined NYC but he went to Australia. This move of Lampard to City is simple mocking ob both towards Chelsea, like they would put a fucking finger in Chelsea ass and its unaceptable from Lamps, who is chelsea legend. Disgrace.

cos he knows that he is the 3rd choice striker now!!! and he wont get much playing time!!!

12mil loan? for an injured and "lets see how he holds up his legs player".. nope. would rather that RM take him and monaco take torres off us. perfect scenario.

We are already covered FFP wise with the sale of lukaku. That was a 20mil profit. So it not only covers up torres' FFP cost but also the cost of the 2nd striker (remy/bony/chicha)

The fact that he is yet to be given a number officially just makes me a little worried. Either he is out or maybe we are waiting to sell cech and give him the no.1.

All the best for the new phase hilario.

i thought he was supposed to be a BEAST in training!!! well... he definitely does some voodoo to make jose not sell him!!!

not wanted!!! not needed!!!

1. chelsea 2. city 3. united. 4. everton 5. arsenal 6. spurs

Our board has done some tremendous job in buying the big names and selling the "big names". But when it came to reserve players, we have sold them at a very nominal price. Pva for 1.5mil, ba for 4.8 mil, kakuta for free.

to have legends come and train with us is fine. but pay them their salaries while they are players of other teams and will have no part to play for us is unheard of. i have not seen THIS happening. moreover dude, how hard is it to get it that city NEEDED him to fulfil their HG quota. boyata, clichy, hart, lescott, milner, richards, rodwell, nimely and wright. from these players they will be losing richards, rodwell, lescott and probably boyata. he is a NYCFC player which is owned by city. so they are basically helping themselves to a player that is theirs to use. what do u want them to do? send lamps melbourne and buy some 10mil shit from stoke as their HG option? i dont think its charity but just common sense. also what "spite"? we are reading too much between the lines when their would be nothing at all. jose does not seem to be hassled by this. infact the only person hassled by it so far is arsene.

He is a CFC legend and 2 years down the road he WILL be on our coaching staff but we are not a charity here. Zola was a legend but I don't think we would give him a coaching job just for the sake of it.And this is what considering the fact that city would let it happen or that FL would accept this "charity". He is still a pro footballer and with it comes some integrity.

I don't think jose wanted to sell him. If we had wanted to sell him, he would have been sold. I mean we sold ba, pva, lukaku, luiz for some excellent deals. Kakuta fetched as much as he could and I am sure bertrand would have been sold if we needed him to be.Finding a club for mikel would have been no issue. But jose seems to rate him as out 2nd DM ahead of romeu, nat. So that should settle it.

Why will we pay him 4mil (or since it is half a season 2mil) to train with us? Why would city/new york pay him for doing that when they NEED him cos he perfectly fits their HG criteria!!!

so basically we did a hilario with mark!!!

Costa offered so much more than goal threat. But when the mid is being over run, a striker can do only so much. Infact the best thing a striker can do is change the tide of the match with an easy clear cut chance. Torres dint. But considering the fact that u think torres was okay/good, its hard to make u understand it. Infact what exactly was good abiut torrea today dude? His miss at the far post from the cross? His one on one miss? I remeber barbara stating in the match thread that torres had lost the ball 3 times and fucked up our attack in the first 10 minutes itself. Or was it that he gave the ball away which led to the goal? I mean what exactly was it that made his performance good.

I could not bring myself to read after "torres did okay today". Can't be having an argument with someone who thinks that.

Go and read the comment that I quoted rather than jumping down a man's throat. Also see who brought lukaku up.

???

I know. But people should not be ridiculing or saying things which are false either.

if it was lukaku playing instead of torres on the wing and those chances fell to him, i can bet anything that he would have scored.

jose cant possibly be thinking of going into the season with costa, 36 year old DD and this donkey as our strikers.

my bad!!! dont know how u got quoted!! sorry.

this is coming from a guy who thought that selling torres at a cut price is playing FIFA. just to be sure, torres is STILL one of the most popular players in the world. for most of the world, chelsea is the bad guy while torres is still a good striker. at the end of the last season, villa was hopelessly out of form, just came back from an injury. so u know, dont be so clueless. just use that mind-thing once in a while.