MoroccanBlue

400kpw? Jog on mate

Imagine that.

Reckon it would be Zouma gone.

It will. The FA and PL clubs have all voted to finish the season indefinitely. Whether in July or in November. It will finish.

Yes. July.

Expected to start again in July. Assuming the league then ends in September. Wonder how the transfer market plays out. Does it still open normally in July?

Barca makes sense

So long he performs I couldn’t give a shit

Switching Ronaldo to the left was one of the smartest things SAF has ever done to fully utilise Ronaldo. He had a field day against Essien during the CL final. Thing with Cole was that he found it naturally easy to contain skilled wingers, it was raw pace like Valencia and Walcott he struggled with.

If we sign Chilwell at all I'd be disappointed. Not buying the rumor at all. Just recycled rubbish given there is nothing to report. Declan Rice is a funny one. Can toss that one with the Carroll, Tarkowski, Wilson, and Lascelles rumors The fact we avoided panic buys in January, and made a deal with Ajax that has every club in Europe jealous of this transaction, has me believing our board (with hopefully Cech's influence) have learned to allocate our resources that actually upgrades the team and not stalls it.

I think FA Cup and European competition will be voided.

Will die quickly like the Isco rumors.

Get it done

That's just good business. We need ready made players in their prime. Something the squad lacks.

Not to sound extremely selfish but any decision the FA makes goes in our favor? Season is null and void, we are still in the CL. Season ends how it is, we are still in the CL. Only the matter of whether there will be a summer window

Oh give me a break Vesper. You can't have a sensible debate without insulting or getting emotional when someone counters your viewpoint! I provided you rational and factual counter arguments. Instead, you've insulted my counter arguments in every one of your posts, ridiculed my intelligence, even said you'd shut me down in regards to this topic, yet have the audacity to claim I have condescended you? You are a shining example of progressive hostility, which highlights the irony when those say only the right incite hate.

You are still failing to see the premise of my argument, which is the actual validity of Bernie's projections. Again, there are countless statistical data from third party, unbiased economists and researchers that state Bernie's projections are insoluble. He would need even more revenue than he is proposing to fully offset those costs, which goes well beyond any figure close to 50 trillion. He was backed into a corner during the last debate when confronted by the other candidates. I could very well say the same thing that you've been fed 100% bogus info by Bernie and his research/media campaign. This gets us no where if the premise can't be acknowledged. According to CNN, only 30% of democrats preferred a national health plan for all Americans. To make things into a bigger perspective, only 21% of all Americans say they prefer a single payer system whilst eliminating private insurance. According to CNN as well, 71% of American's on private health insurance plans like their plans. Why? Americans like having the option of having their health, dental, and vision insurance through their employer. Americans like having family physicians and the ability to choose doctors. Americans like having short waiting periods as opposed to other similar sized countries that implement a universal health care system. Like I said, the better approach to win the centrists and moderates is to propose a medicare for all act without eliminating private insurance. So simple that economists with PhD's from around the country can't get it. Right, when Bernie loses, you can refer back to this post.

Relax. Take it easy. This is a healthy debate. Bernie plans on spending 70-90 trillion within the next ten years which is double the size of the federal budget. The biggest concern with that, for not only the republican party but the majority of the democratic party, are that the projected numbers he's proposed are not realistic. No offence, but I will believe Economists with PhD's who refute those numbers, especially when a vast majority of them are democrats. Simply put, to make all of his policies work he would need even more revenue than he is proposing to fully offset those costs. It isn't realistic to believe you can get all those revenues from the top 1, 5, or 10 percent. It either has to go on the deficit or the tax payers. During the debate, he failed to even counter the other candidates arguments on his spending plan. You bring up that research, I can refute that there are several unbiased statistical data that not only show the hidden costs of his medicare for all plan, but for virtually every one of his policies. Republican's refuting his policies is bad enough, but when there is a sheer divide within the Democratic party on Bernie's projections, that is when there should be a cause for concern. And again, I'll reiterate, I think the bigger reason for the separation is that a large portion of Democrats still want to have Private Health Insurance along with Free healthcare, not rid it completely.

I know Spurs fans still have issues with the way he sets them up, even considering their injuries.

That would be a mistake for me personally. Especially if Kovacic is fit. Performing well for a stretch of games, hell even two in a row, has never been Barkely's forte

Giroud Pedro----------------Willian Mount Kovacic----Gilmour Alonso---Zouma---Rudiger---James Kepa

This will likely be the case with all top clubs moving forward. TAA and Gomez will soon be given greater contracts. Foden too when he realises what his former youth team mates are earning. Investing in talented youth players could save a club a fortune in the long run.

So if it's so simple why do 90% of the Democratic candidates and a vast majority of PhD economists refute those projections? Another note, most centrists still want to have private health care.

Biden, Harris, Tulsi, Buttigieg and others have all argued against those projections and the actual validity of it. Majority of American economists agree.

I said maybe a year or two back, don't know if it was this or another forum, that Trump will win on the basis that there are no good Democratic candidates. The key to beating Trump is to appeal to the American centrists/moderates. Biden is the closest thing to that, even though he shows genuine signs of dementia. Sanders is far too radical to appeal to this group. And I disagree, I don't find Bernie's policies reasonable. Eliminating private health care and implementing policies that would cost more than the entire federal budget, whilst at the same time saying the middle class won't be taxed without providing how it will be funded, is a bit concerning. Especially when the other democrats questioned him.