whats happening

now what kind of argument is this. if it's already at risk why would we want to make it harder for ourselves and play those less skilled young guys? dragovic just signed for leverkusen, he's clearly above papy, miazga and that type of guys. it would be stupid to play unproven guys over him if we had to chance to buy him. and who guarentee that romagnoli will or is better than dragovic? and bayer payed him 18 million euros. thats 2,3 or 4 times less than koulibaly or romagnoli.

and to risk our top4 place just to use unproven youth players? thats how small clubs work, who cant afford to buy players.

we have 6 or 7 defenders for the whole season (or until january). 1 or 2 injuries and we're fucked.

he only played 3 games at euros. thats not enough to judge if he's suitable for chelsea or not. and even if he's not that good, it's still better than no players at all. atleast we would have a a decent sub. until january or until christiansen comes back.

bayer leverkusen has sign dragovic from kiev. how come we havent been linked with dragovic at all? he would be a decent signing.

next game. moeses instead of pedro. cesc instead of oscar. and a mule instead of ivanovic. should expect a lot better game

i would kill myself if i had to play with him every week. ivanovic, oscar, cahill, terry, pedro, costa. we dont need them in the first 11.