LAM09

That's how bad things have become in less than a year under Boehly's ownership. 🥲

It's funny how there was a constant narrative that managers wouldn't want to join Chelsea during Roman's ownership due to his trigger-happy nature, but look at the state of things now. The sole candidate who was somewhat appealing has stepped away from the job. To say it's worrying is a massive understatement.

If you want to insult others, at least have the gall to quote them. 😉 I think you should direct your anger to Roman's right-hand lady in this case.

Highest level aka finishing in the top 4 thanks to Tottenham..... Tuchel just happens to be part of this particular conversation. However, my rationale applies to every manager aside from Mourinho, as I stated in another post. I've never once said Tuchel or any other manager shouldn't be held accountable for transfers. My issues have always been with those that say "X was useless in the transfer market" when the large majority of signings were at the very least 4, 5, or even six on a list of targets for those during their tenure.

That's a bone to pick with him personally. It might have come down to his eagerness to compete for the title after winning the CL. My guess is as good as anyone's in that regard. On the topic of Klopp, isn't it meant to be believed that Salah was never his choice? If accurate, your comparison doesn't really mean much.

As @Vegetable pointed out, he wasn't exactly going to publicly say he wasn't satisfied with the business. If I'm thirsty, would you rather I died of dehydration than have the only other alternative? The above echoes the obvious. Tuchel wanted Haaland & Kane; if you think those players aren't significantly better than Lukaku, I'm already fighting a losing battle.

Would he have been a squad player, though? His minutes would have been reduced when Lukaku joined, but following that, he would have most likely been an undisputed starter, if fit.

"His". 😄 How is it on that hill?

Or you keep thinking he's to blame because it suits your narrative and your opinion of him.

An investment chosen by the previous ownership, not the manager in charge. The point still stands. All right. I concur with the former, but I still hold to my prior opinions regarding the latter. He is superior to what people believe, as he has demonstrated at City.

Letting Giroud go has to be up there as one of the worst decisions in recent seasons. His recent achievements for the French NT & for Milan go to show that.

That was exactly my point. I've always said and will continue to say so until there's evidence to provide otherwise—that most managers didn't get their main targets. A quick analogy: I want a can of Coke more than anything but would be okay with store brand lemonade if I were forced. I end up with the latter as a result. I didn't WANT the latter but will put up with it. The two options aren't equal. That was nothing more than a publicity stunt.

He publicly stated Lukaku was his first choice CF option? If so, please provide that quote while I prepare the humble pie for Iftar.

"Unrealistic list". It's apparent that the players that signed were most likely not first choices and, like those before him, were stuck with what he was given. Tuchel WANTED Hakimi. How did that turn out?

A Milan vs RM final would be ideal. The two most successful teams in the competition facing each other on Ancelotti's birthday.

It still mystifies me that people think Tuchel had a call on transfers like those before him. I personally believe Mourinho is the only manager during Roman's ownership who got the targets he actually wanted.

This discussion we had early on in the season dawned on me, so I wonder if your opinion has changed at all considering he's been an ever-present for Man City despite all options being available to Pep?

He has his heart in the right place, which is unlike most at the club judging by this season. Let's hope those making the decisions take note rather than having a word directly with him for saying what most believe.

That's the difference. Imagine if he was playing last night.

The plus points of having someone in charge for a lengthy period of time & unlimited funds. Chalobah has never good enough. His brief bright spot after his last loan spell seemed to fool a few, especially the board at the time.

The fact Boehly already owns a sports team is mindboggling. City still have presence where it matters. Rodri being a key name.

Any of the names mentioned would have done a better job than winless Lamps. Have you read the reports that there is literally no tactical work during training instead, Lamps is having therapy sessions with each player instead? You can't even laugh at the current mess we're in anymore.

Napoli's penalty woes cost them again. Got knockout in the Coppa Italia on PK's and have missed multiple in this CL campaign alone.

We started the second half in similar fashion, with the best chance falling to Kante for the umpteenth time. Chalobah showed his lack of IQ in gifting RM progression. It's not about whether he was right or wrong; the idea that Boehly actually thought he was the man to galvanise this squad is farcical.

The fact that Boehly believed we had a chance of winning the CL only to go & hand that job to a man who said we were years away from competing prior to our 2021 CL triumph. Everyone thought it was easy to win something every year while Roman was here, but Boehly is making it look extremely difficult to even compete.