Fernando Torres

[milllz 43]

if ther is a player involved it best not be sturridge, anyone think of the idea £40m + kalou ?:eyebrows:

[ZanSnake 1,211]

It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.

Mikel is tommo's dream - the african magnet!

He attracts the attention of all the African people in the stadium in a moment of happiness, and/or celebration.

[22mek22 133]

I know someone who works at Anfield and from what he hears Torres is staying.

Disappointing Chelsea.

[King11Didier 916]

Carlo won't sell Kalou.50mln + Anelka?????? Liverpool can go to fuck themselves.

50mln-That is tooooo big price for this player.We can buy 3 excellent players with these money.

Anelka-He is a classic player.He can score from every situation.He is old yes but he can help on Chelsea in different situations.You don't know what player we have to say that deal with Anelka is good.

[ChelseaChick 430]

anyone think of the idea £40m + kalou ?:eyebrows:

Eh no

[Corlett 202]

Carlo won't sell Kalou.50mln + Anelka?????? Liverpool can go to fuck themselves.

50mln-That is tooooo big price for this player.We can buy 3 excellent players with these money.

Anelka-He is a classic player.He can score from every situation.He is old yes but he can help on Chelsea in different situations.You don't know what player we have to say that deal with Anelka is good.

Let's be honest, no we can't.

[Mário César 812]

I know someone who works at Anfield and from what he hears Torres is staying.

Disappointing Chelsea.

Really? :S

[milllz 43]

Eh no

it would be better than £50m + anelka though wouldnt it?

[ChelseaChick 430]

it would be better than £50m + anelka though wouldnt it?

Well atm Kalou is better than Anelka...and younger

[Henrique 9,133]

Anelka is better than Torres. He never get injured, he helps the team, if not with goals, with his passes and with his good movements around the pitch.

So 50m for a overrated striker plus Anelka is really stupid. If we include not Anelka, but Kalou in the deal will be OK, not because I think the spanish is worth 50m, but because I do believe that leting Kalou go is worth even more than that.

[J.F. 1,484]

It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.

maybe he said to him, ''one day you might score a goal like that!''

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I just think they go to Mikel to rub it in. "Haha, I just scored, learn to shoot bitch."

[zolayes 14,489]

no way would I give scumpool 50 mill ..it could strengthen them too much ..If Rafa was still there it might be different he would have wasted it ..

Dalglish might not .Also with our luck Torres would get long term injury ..Risk is too big.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Signing Torres might be a mistake. He's injury prone and we'd have to change systems to enable him to play.

[Laylabelle 9,296]

Wouldnt mind us signing him for 30,35 but plus a player no way!

[Badboy 1,526]

Anelka is better than Torres. He never get injured, he helps the team, if not with goals, with his passes and with his good movements around the pitch.

So 50m for a overrated striker plus Anelka is really stupid. If we include not Anelka, but Kalou in the deal will be OK, not because I think the spanish is worth 50m, but because I do believe that leting Kalou go is worth even more than that.

Torres is better then Anelka son !

[Bir_CFC 3,455]

It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.

That's cause before the game, Mikel told Essien that he has a feeling he'd score today. (Essien explained on "At home with Essien")

Probably same deal with Kalou today.

Mikel probably picks a random guy every game and tells him that so he can get free hugs.

[whinni09 37]

to much for a player like torres. hope chelsea says 40 million or nothing.. hope they'll get ganso and a player like sergio ramos in the summer instead of torres tbh