EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Chelsea and Manchester City are in a cheque book war for Nicolas Anelka - but they will have to fork out £30million to sign the France striker.Anelka will leave Bolton if the bidding reaches £15m in the January transfer window and insiders say he is also looking for a contract until 2011 and £4million a year in wages.It is a huge bill that is being considered by both Avram Grant and Sven Goran Eriksson, who head the list of Anelka's many admirers, with the wages being unofficially passed on by agents to the interested clubs.Chelsea may have a slight edge as they can throw players into the deal, but Eriksson would love Anelka back at City and has pushed him to the top of his shopping list.Source: Mirror Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Again the player that I would like to come for CFC but he is over rated with money too!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 There are many strikers i would like to see at Chelsea before Anelka, don't like him and he is very very overrated... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 There are many strikers i would like to see at Chelsea before Anelka, don't like him and he is very very overrated...strikers Like?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 VillaHuntelaarBerbatovEto'oHenryToniKloseect.......Hell i would even prefer a young talented inexperienced player over him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 I agree complatly about one...Jan Klass Huntelaar what a class.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 VillaHuntelaarBerbatovEto'oHenryToniKloseect.......Hell i would even prefer a young talented inexperienced player over him.Out of those mentioned I think Klose would be the better signing imo, although Huntelaar seems more likely to happen with all the noise surrounding him and our Dutch contacts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 Out of those mentioned I think Klose would be the better signing imo, although Huntelaar seems more likely to happen with all the noise surrounding him and our Dutch contactsWould prefer Huntelaar purely because he is younger and still has a lot offer and can adapt better at a younger age to Premiership football.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Would prefer Huntelaar purely because he is younger and still has a lot offer and can adapt better at a younger age to Premiership football..Defo, Give him a few years and he'll be hitting his prime. Ideal time to get him really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 Defo, Give him a few years and he'll be hitting his prime. Ideal time to get him really.Absolutely, it's about time we started picking players up again in their prime or just before. We lost our way little recently in that respect but we need to get back to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Defo, Give him a few years and he'll be hitting his prime. Ideal time to get him really.You have just put something on my mind why we shouldn't bye Jermain Defoe??? I think that he is a really great great attacker for cover and he is already adapted on premieship..<?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Many teams have been linked with Defoe in the past and he's stated more times that enough that he's happy at Spurs.I dont see him as the prolific scorer that we need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 You have just put something on my mind why we shouldn't bye Jermain Defoe??? I think that he is a really great great attacker for cover and he is already adapted on premieship..<??There are countless reasons why we shouldn't buy Jermain Defore, the main one being - he can't even get a game in the bloody Spurs squad and he is cack... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisGnu 0 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Many teams have been linked with Defoe in the past and he's stated more times that enough that he's happy at Spurs.I dont see him as the prolific scorer that we need.Thats true.Not sure at all about his future at Spurs now though.Class player though!Anelka is not good enough in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 (edited) But I still think that we just need player for cover., or maybe not on ST positon..We have DD by the end of season shorly and we have Sheva and Pizzaro and Kalou is always there so maybe we don't need anyone...I like this 4-3-2-1 formation so.. Edited November 20, 2007 by Mungii Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott 7 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 You have just put something on my mind why we shouldn't bye Jermain Defoe??? I think that he is a really great great attacker for cover and he is already adapted on premieship..<??Had we gone for Defoe when he left the Hammers, I think he may have turned into a good player for us, but he's failed to reach his potential now and I don't think he will ever reach it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 how old is he now'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Huntleaar Klose or Toni Toni or Klose would never happen, but I think they are both class!Anelka is not for Chelsea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott 7 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 how old is he now'?25. But now I feel he can only be a decent Premiership striker, not a world class one which is what we need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungii 3 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Huntleaar Klose or Toni Toni or Klose would never happen, but I think they are both class!Anelka is not for ChelseaToni and Klose came to Byern this year and they are going really great with them and they won't let them come....Huntelar can come becose Europe big clubs are expecting to grab him as soon as possible we should be first to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.