The Pub - Discuss Anything

[capriccioso 2,545]

Back on topic, unless the entire Western world unconditionally supports the USA, they will be crushed by the People's Liberation Army.

Communists make better soldiers than capitalists.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

Back on topic, unless the entire Western world unconditionally supports the USA, they will be crushed by the People's Liberation Army.

Communists make better soldiers than capitalists.

we spend more on military than anyone else in the WORLD, we wont be goin down to no one, plus we have the Isreales and England on our side.

no wayy we gona lose unless whole world comes in against us. hahaha

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

is anyone allowed to quote people from pages before?? please help cuz i cant only on my mobile can i do it. on my laptop nada thx.

[OneMoSalah 8,766]

we spend more on military than anyone else in the WORLD, we wont be goin down to no one, plus we have the Isreales and England on our side.

no wayy we gona lose unless whole world comes in against us. hahaha

You don't have Scotland on your side, so in my terms, you have no chance ! We'll just go Braveheart on every cunt and drop kick their relatives. Eventually though some high ranking Scots man will be hung and quartered just like William Wallace, personally I hope the English mistaken Piers Morgan and do it to him, what a cunt.

USA can spend all they want on their military tbh and plus having the English on your side isn't a good thing, David Cameron is a bitch as is Nick Clegg and they will cave into whatever demands USA make likely.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

You don't have Scotland on your side, so in my terms, you have no chance ! We'll just go Braveheart on every cunt and drop kick their relatives.

lmfao!! how can ye when your getin stuck in the lifts! hahahahahaha

[capriccioso 2,545]

we spend more on military than anyone else in the WORLD, we wont be goin down to no one, plus we have the Isreales and England on our side.

no wayy we gona lose unless whole world comes in against us. hahaha

As I said earlier, by far the most important factor of victory in war (and this is research from the West Point Academy) is the amount of steel a nation can produce. China has 4 times the population of the USA, roughly 1.3 billion. They only need to send about 5 million soldiers, everybody else can be used utterly to do nothing but manufacture products for the army. Stalin did the same thing with the USSR in the 40s, that was the reason they single handedly won WW2 in Europe.

The USA cannot force its civilians to work themselves to death producing steel. That is the main advantage that one party, human rights poor countries have in war- they can do what they want and no one is going to stop them.

Also Vietnam, and Afghanistan have defeated you. I'll give the USA slack with Afghanistan, that place has never been invaded successfully, not even Alexander the Great could do it.

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

we spend more on military than anyone else in the WORLD, we wont be goin down to no one, plus we have the Isreales and England on our side.

no wayy we gona lose unless whole world comes in against us. hahaha

No offence but how ignorant. Australia's army is smaller in size but just about as strong as yours. American would lose in a war big time because you've made far too many enemies. You'd have no chance whatsoever to be honest and Americans know that.

[OneMoSalah 8,766]

lmfao!! how can ye when your getin stuck in the lifts! hahahahahaha

Haha we will find our ways out of lifts........ one day...........

[capriccioso 2,545]

No offence but how ignorant. Australia's army is smaller in size but just about as strong as yours. American would lose in a war big time because you've made far too many enemies. You'd have no chance whatsoever to be honest and Americans know that.

Not a chance, we are one of the weakest nations in Asia. If it weren't for US support I reckon Indonesia would have tried something by now.

[bababoom 4,478]

The British army may not have the best technology and equipment, but we defintely have the best trained, Most skilled and professional soldiers In all the world.

[capriccioso 2,545]

The British army may not have the best technology and equipment, but we defintely have the best trained, Most skilled and professional soldiers In all the world.

But are the British people capable of out-manufacturing China or the USA?

Steel= war won.

http://www.amazon.com/Freedoms-Forge-American-Business-Produced/dp/1400069645

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

No offence but how ignorant. Australia's army is smaller in size but just about as strong as yours. American would lose in a war big time because you've made far too many enemies. You'd have no chance whatsoever to be honest and Americans know that.

hahahaha, that why i included israel (small country strong ass fuck military). and it all depends who we are facing, there is no way we're losisng to fukin pakistan in a war, or france for that matter. it all depends who what when where and most important WHY, cuz that where the allies come in.

and if came off ignorant im sorry, never was meant to be read in that tone of voice more laughable really. but srrry for any offenses anyone may have taken.

[OneMoSalah 8,766]

But are the British people capable of out-manufacturing China or the USA?

Steel= war won.

http://www.amazon.co...d/dp/1400069645

WE WILL RECYLCE OUR POTS AND PANS LIKE LAST TIME!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL NOT THEY AINT GETTING MY PANS, I NEED TO MAKE CHEESY PASTA AND STUFF.

[capriccioso 2,545]

hahahaha, that why i included israel (small country strong ass fuck military). and it all depends who we are facing, there is no way we're losisng to fukin pakistan in a war, or france for that matter. it all depends who what when where and most important WHY, cuz that where the allies come in.

and if came off ignorant im sorry, never was meant to be read in that tone of voice more laughable really. but srrry for any offenses anyone may have taken.

I do think you'll be in trouble against the Chinese if it's just the USA against China. You need allies to match China's industrial potential.

Other than that the USA should be just fine against anyone it chooses to fight. Except Vietnam/any jungle type terrain that's very unsuited to war. Or Afghanistan.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

As I said earlier, by far the most important factor of victory in war (and this is research from the West Point Academy) is the amount of steel a nation can produce. China has 4 times the population of the USA, roughly 1.3 billion. They only need to send about 5 million soldiers, everybody else can be used utterly to do nothing but manufacture products for the army. Stalin did the same thing with the USSR in the 40s, that was the reason they single handedly won WW2 in Europe.

The USA cannot force its civilians to work themselves to death producing steel. That is the main advantage that one party, human rights poor countries have in war- they can do what they want and no one is going to stop them.

Also Vietnam, and Afghanistan have defeated you. I'll give the USA slack with Afghanistan, that place has never been invaded successfully, not even Alexander the Great could do it.

sure thing but when it come down to it, no way would any of us have a "full blown war" just cause of financial implication but if push come to shove, the only saving grace would be russia for us and we all know how much of a wild card they are.

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

Not a chance, we are one of the weakest nations in Asia. If it weren't for US support I reckon Indonesia would have tried something by now.

Not in terms of how strong our individual soldiers are. They are some of the most professional and highly trained in the world. I remember hearing that 1 Australian soldier is equivalent to 3 American ones.

[bababoom 4,478]

But are the British people capable of out-manufacturing China or the USA?

Steel= war won.

http://www.amazon.com/Freedoms-Forge-American-Business-Produced/dp/1400069645

You're right.

[capriccioso 2,545]

sure thing but when it come down to it, no way would any of us have a "full blown war" just cause of financial implication but if push come to shove, the only saving grace would be russia for us and we all know how much of a wild card they are.

I think it will be a war of proxy for the next few decades, just like how the Cold War turned out. The US will get their allies to fight China's allies. But the financial systems aren't that integrated. China owns a lot of the debt that the US owes, but the US can say fuck you anytime to the Chinese and just stop buying their products and not repaying the loans. China can do the same, stop giving the USA it's products and force them to pay back the loans. Neither side are that far in that breaking away would mean economic ruin.