the wes 7,212 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 On 8/9/2015 at 1:16 PM, lucio said: Is the buyback option still there? If we can't get stones , i hope we go for someone else , maybe rudiger, umtiti , this guy. Chelsea can no longer activate Jeffrey Bruma's release clause after the Dutch defender signed a new contract with PSV.  http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/14382/eredivisie/2016/02/22/20601462/-? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 According to reports Chelsea are to make €5m on bruma going to Wolfsburg http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2016/6/25/12028120/jeffrey-bruma-chelsea-wolfsburg-sell-on  http://m.telegraaf.nl/telesport/voetbal/psv/article/26072787/wolfsburg-rekent-op-komst-bruma#voetbal/227/fixtures/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,111 Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 9 hours ago, the wes said: According to reports Chelsea are to make €5m on bruma going to Wolfsburg http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2016/6/25/12028120/jeffrey-bruma-chelsea-wolfsburg-sell-on  http://m.telegraaf.nl/telesport/voetbal/psv/article/26072787/wolfsburg-rekent-op-komst-bruma#voetbal/227/fixtures/ 1) As per usual we don't know, and probably won't know, for sure that this is true but it looks authoritative. 2) 30% of €15m is not €5m. If they think the clause is about 33% then say so. 3) Every club in the world inserts such clauses whenever they are in a sufficiently strong negotiating position to do so. Selling clubs do not always have a good hand to take to the bargaining table but, when they do, they make the most of it. Nevertheless, there are a bunch of agenda pushers (just say no kids) among TC forum users who tell us that they are far more clever than Chelsea's board because they would always include such agreements whereas our board never does. What evidence do they ever have to justify the boring stream of such assertions they subject us to? No, I don't know either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 On 25/06/2016 at 6:32 PM, OhForAGreavsie said: 1) As per usual we don't know, and probably won't know, for sure that this is true but it looks authoritative. 2) 30% of €15m is not €5m. If they think the clause is about 33% then say so. 3) Every club in the world inserts such clauses whenever they are in a sufficiently strong negotiating position to do so. Selling clubs do not always have a good hand to take to the bargaining table but, when they do, they make the most of it. Nevertheless, there are a bunch of agenda pushers (just say no kids) among TC forum users who tell us that they are far more clever than Chelsea's board because they would always include such agreements whereas our board never does. What evidence do they ever have to justify the boring stream of such assertions they subject us to? No, I don't know either. Because it's an easy excuse to slate the board, and they dont pass up on them. I try not to be too harsh on here to anyone because ultimately we are all Chelsea fans and want the same thing, but the simplistic vendetta against Emenalo and the board is seriously testing my resolve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 he says, we tried to sign him this summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now