Jump to content

🇩🇪 André Schürrle


incometax
 Share

Recommended Posts

Exactly. Its about the best combo for the team... And the way our front 3 work i don't think it would be a problem.

No, you simply dont move your best players from position with the excuse it is the best for the team. You do the other way around, you build the team according to them!

This is one of the first rules of football tactics, the super stars have the priority to dictate how you will build the squad...Schurrle must adpat to RW and not Hazard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you simply dont move your best players from position with the excuse it is the best for the team. You do the other way around, you build the team according to them!

This is one of the first rules of football tactics, the super stars have the priority to dictate how you will build the squad...Schurrle must adpat to RW and not Hazard!

We don't even have a high quality Right winger, and Hazard gets switched to the right hand side several times a game. They all move over the palce and never stay constant. We are not moving him from Left wing to the left back. Just doing the same thing we are doing with Hazard and Moses right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't even have a high quality Right winger, and Hazard gets switched to the right hand side several times a game. They all move over the palce and never stay constant. We are not moving him from Left wing to the left back. Just doing the same thing we are doing with Hazard and Moses right now.

One thing is to sometimes move around the pitch (Ribbery does it, Ronaldo does it, Neymar does it, etc), but is one completely different to have a new main position. Search Hazard's best plays or goals in Youtube and see how many come from the right...

If Schurrle comes, it needs to be for the RW, not to mess with Hazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Di Maria and Sanchez are very realistic options...

Barcelona clearly wants Neymar by the summer and this leaves no space for Villa and Sanchez. While Real will have a major revamp and, according to Marca, Kaka/Di Maria/Higuain/Pepe top the list of players they want to sell.

Di Maria is a good player, if we can get him, then i'd obviously prefer him to Schurrle. But i've already expressed my concerns about Sanchez on his thread, in short, he doesn't exactly add a new dimension to our game: He dribbles a lot and is not a good finsiher, that's about it. Di Maria on the other hand has amazing assist numbers and Schurrle has one of the best long range shots you can find anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing is to sometimes move around the pitch (Ribbery does it, Ronaldo does it, Neymar does it, etc), but is one completely different to have a new main position. Search Hazard's best plays or goals in Youtube and see how many come from the right...

If Schurrle comes, it needs to be for the RW, not to mess with Hazard.

He seemed to come off that right pretty well, do 2 players then put it in the bottom corner pretty well. And he scored that long ranger coming off the righ on his left foot.

The same applies to Schurrle. Just because he hasn't had to play right wing a lot at Bayer it doesn't mean he can't. He too would have to adjust to playing on the right hand side as they would mix and match. We wouldn't do anything to the detrement to Hazard. And i don't see how him playing half the game on the right would make any problems for us. If he isn't being effective they would switch round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Di Maria / Sanchez thing...

If we could get Di Maria, then by all means, i would rather have him. But not too sure on Sanchez...

But its definitely not as easy that, and besides them two, who else is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Di Maria is a good player, if we can get him, then i'd obviously prefer him to Schurrle. But i've already expressed my concerns about Sanchez on his thread, in short, he doesn't exactly add a new dimension to our game: He dribbles a lot and is not a good finsiher, that's about it. Di Maria on the other hand has amazing assist numbers and Schurrle has one of the best long range shots you can find anywhere.

My problem is not exactly Schurrle, it is all that surrounds his transfer. It is way overpriced, it involves KDB, not a move by the new manager (whoever he will be), is not a RW, etc...

Di Maria is by far the best option and by far the most difficult to get. In respect to Sanchez, I think Peace. made two amazing posts on why he would be great here.

Di Maria > Sanchez > Schurrle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time will tell. Just as long as it doesn't involve losing KDB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem is not exactly Schurrle, it is all that surrounds his transfer. It is way overpriced, it involves KDB, not a move by the new manager (whoever he will be), is not a RW, etc...

Di Maria is by far the best option and by far the most difficult to get. In respect to Sanchez, I think Peace. made two amazing posts on why he would be great here.

Di Maria > Sanchez > Schurrle!

Peace is a good poster, but he's no god that can tell how a flop will suddenly become a star in an even tougher league lol. It just isn't smart business and all about ifs, it will make sense for a lesser club to take him and if he does well then probably. Don't forget not only has he not been performing for Barcelona, but same applies on the International level too.

Also remember the last 2 gambles we made with players not doing well at their clubs - Marin and Torres - didn't exactly turn out well to say the least lol.

Sooo, Di Maria > Schurrle >>> Sanchez :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peace is a good poster, but he's no god that can tell how a flop will suddenly become a star in an even tougher league lol. It just isn't smart business and all about ifs, it will make sense for a lesser club to take him and if he does well then probably. Don't forget not only has he not been performing for Barcelona, but same applies on the International level too.

Also remember the last 2 gambles we made with players not doing well at their clubs - Marin and Torres - didn't exactly turn out well to say the least lol.

Sooo, Di Maria > Schurrle >>> Sanchez :)

LOL, he is not God, but he gave enough facts and arguments to sustain his thesis more than the members who were against it. Every transfer is a doubt, but there are ways to choose smart guesses...

Schurrle is more of a gamble than Shancez, so I dont see your point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like playing Robben at LW, you take away his best trick which is cutting in and having a shot at goal.

Hazard plays RW almost every game, and there have been times he's started from there - doesn't change anything, he can still beat his man and create space for others.

Hazard playing on the RW doesn't change a thing? Have you actually seen how ineffective he is on the right? When Hazard has played there, he has never really posed any threat to the opposition and it's a different thing altogether playing there temporarily in games and playing as his main position. The best position for him is the LW because that is where he's most comfortable at and strongest in causing damage to the opponent. With the talent and ability he's got, we should be playing him in his best position where we can get the best out of him, not play square pegs in round hole and only get half of the player he is.

What makes you think he's going to be a starter?

Did you notice the 'if' in the sentence there??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another winger? what we will play 2 7 1? with triple wingers each side and a CM?

That would give :

team A

Moses - Oscar - Schuurle

----------- BA ----------------

team B

Hulk - Mata - Hazard

-------- new striker --------

We would get rid of marin and benayoun, i don't know what you mean with your triple wingers each side... with rotation and cup games, that would be nice like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hazard playing on the RW doesn't change a thing? Have you actually seen how ineffective he is on the right? When Hazard has played there, he has never really posed any threat to the opposition and it's a different thing altogether playing there temporarily in games and playing as his main position. The best position for him is the LW because that is where he's most comfortable at and strongest in causing damage to the opponent. With the talent and ability he's got, we should be playing him in his best position where we can get the best out of him, not play square pegs in round hole and only get half of the player he is.

I haven't noticed how ineffective Hazard is on the right. As far as i'm concerned he's capable of playing effectively in any of the 3 positions behind the striker but is obviously far better as CAM because he gets the ball more.

Schurrle is more of a gamble than Shancez, so I dont see your point!

Actually i don't see your point lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would give :

team A

Moses - Oscar - Schuurle

----------- BA ----------------

team B

Hulk - Mata - Hazard

-------- new striker --------

We would get rid of marin and benayoun, i don't know what you mean with your triple wingers each side... with rotation and cup games, that would be nice like that

Let's be honest, Zenit would ask X elevated to N for him (so maybe trillions). And if we sign Schurrle for £20M to make him sub or team b?

Not liking it. no, sir.

By the way, if you want a killer player for the wing and ST, really inexpensive (£5M), google Jesé Rodriguez, and then go to videos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't noticed how ineffective Hazard is on the right. As far as i'm concerned he's capable of playing effectively in any of the 3 positions behind the striker but is obviously far better as CAM because he gets the ball more.

Agree to disagree then on Hazard at RW. :)

As for saying Hazard gets the ball more in CAM, that may be the case but again, he can't do too much damage there unless in counter attacking situations where he can get loads of space and time to operate. The reason why Hazard doesn't suit in the CAM role is because his main abilities is getting on the ball, run at defenders and dribble past them. In this middle, he won't be able to do that too much because teams these days play a pivot or 3 midfielders in front of their defence and in this case, Hazard won't get the time and space to do. He might even actually lose the ball a tad more because of trying to dribble past people and being crowded out in that area! He's not like Mata where he passes, then move, pass, then move, pass then move making him very hard to mark and defend against in that CAM area.

If we really are to get the absolute best out of Hazard, we really need to play him in best position which is at LW. He has the pace, trickery, ability to run with the ball and dribble past players and all of this is best exploited in that wide left role because that is where he can have the time and space to do what he's great at, which is something he won't enjoy much in the CAM position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...