Jump to content

Demba Ba


KonohasOrangeFlash
 Share

Recommended Posts

biting a player, delibrately diving , calling a person racist names is equivalent to getting one decision?

so are norwich defenders cheats when ba dint get the penalty? or is chicha a cheat for not saying that he was offside when he scored the winner against us in 3-2 defeat.

what happened on saturday is a part and parcel of the game. some "decisions" go your way, others dont. but getting a decision is one thing and doing things like suarez does is completely different. how can you even compare these two things? i mean what did ba "get away with"? one favourable decision is very different when compared to simulating, and thats what suarez does.

I was just answering your so what? I'm clearly saying his performance on that game was not good. Because the only real contribution he made was by cheating. And he missed clear opportunities to score which could've cost us the game.

Yeah Terry never racially abused anyone... did not lose England's captaincy over it... :rolleyes: And without the cultural/language barrier that people here tend to forget. PK you mean one the of the many of Ba dives?! Yeah that's what I meant about going to the ground all the time.

Sorry for bring up Suarez; I don't think one can put Suarez and Ba in the same sentence; one of them knows how to play football.

Blatant handball? No, it wasn't. It was an accidental one. He controlled Lampard's pass with his right foot and as he did that, the ball just bounced off his right hand.

It was a bad first touch and he used his arm to correct it. If you think otherwise, I can offer you this little bit of land on the moon for a very reasonable price...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand Etoo having problems .. he has been chilling in Russia for some time now.. so i guess we must give him some time to find his favourite shooting boots.. .. even though out of the 3 i have to say i prefer El Zorro than the rest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just answering your so what? I'm clearly saying his performance on that game was not good. Because the only real contribution he made was by cheating. And he missed clear opportunities to score which could've cost us the game.

Yeah Terry never racially abused anyone... did not lose England's captaincy over it... :rolleyes: And without the cultural/language barrier that people here tend to forget. PK you mean one the of the many of Ba dives?! Yeah that's what I meant about going to the ground all the time.

Sorry for bring up Suarez; I don't think one can put Suarez and Ba in the same sentence; one of them knows how to play football.

It was a bad first touch and he used his arm to correct it. If you think otherwise, I can offer you this little bit of land on the moon for a very reasonable price...

It wasn't the greatest of first touch but not a bad one like you're making it out to be. He got the ball decent/good enough and it bounced off his hand as he controlled the ball. If you can't even see the incident (objectively), perhaps a trip to the specsavers will help you with that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drogba didn't seem to have a problem with scoring as a Chelsea striker. I don't get the issue. The current ones just aren't performing well enough.

No doubt the current strike force aren't performing but tbh Drogba only score more than 12 goals 2 out of 8 seasons in the league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt the current strike force aren't performing but tbh Drogba only score more than 12 goals 2 out of 8 seasons in the league

True and also Gudjohnsen, Hasselbaink before only scored okay amounts of goals per season. For the last decade Lamps has been our most consistent goal threat ending up topscorer of the club more often than not. In fact his conversion rate has been better than any striker he played with, no wonder he has scored more. Still even without a high scoring striker we always had a decent goal tally per season, cos we created enough chances and shared the goals around. When Drogba found a similarly consistent scoring streak we broke all sorts of goal records. But one has to say, Drogba's conversion was not perfect but better than any of his successor's + Drogba scored in big matches and Drogba could score from all sorts of positions. He also created a hell lot of chances. I would be ok, if we had 1 striker who would only score 12 important goals and always contributes to the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just answering your so what? I'm clearly saying his performance on that game was not good. Because the only real contribution he made was by cheating. And he missed clear opportunities to score which could've cost us the game.

Yeah Terry never racially abused anyone... did not lose England's captaincy over it... :rolleyes: And without the cultural/language barrier that people here tend to forget. PK you mean one the of the many of Ba dives?! Yeah that's what I meant about going to the ground all the time.

Sorry for bring up Suarez; I don't think one can put Suarez and Ba in the same sentence; one of them knows how to play football.

and i have said again and again that he was our most potent threat on that day. so how was his performance not good?

on the other hand u are taking a handball totally out of context. i dont think any of the norwich players complained even after we scored. should tell u how minimum the contact was. so the "blatant handball" argument is BS.

i seriously think u need to know the meaning of cheating before accusing any1. ba did not cheat. he got a favorable decision. wait, why am i even replyin to somethin as silly as this. the person who thinks ba and suarez are guilty at the same level, definitely has some issues. i mean a person who does not know the difference between going down easily and diving, unfair decision and blantant cheating... goes on to show many things. :blink::blink::blink:

u should be sorry to bring up ba and suarez in the same sentence. because one of them is a good human, while the other is a cannibal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and i have said again and again that he was our most potent threat on that day. so how was his performance not good?

on the other hand u are taking a handball totally out of context. i dont think any of the norwich players complained even after we scored. should tell u how minimum the contact was. so the "blatant handball" argument is BS.

i seriously think u need to know the meaning of cheating before accusing any1. ba did not cheat. he got a favorable decision. wait, why am i even replyin to somethin as silly as this. the person who thinks ba and suarez are guilty at the same level, definitely has some issues. i mean a person who does not know the difference between going down easily and diving, unfair decision and blantant cheating... goes on to show many things. :blink::blink::blink:

u should be sorry to bring up ba and suarez in the same sentence. because one of them is a good human, while the other is a cannibal.

Do you think that (guilty at the same level)? Because I certainly did not say it. :rolleyes: What I asked for is some consistency... don't treat our players like saints they are not. The fact Terry (one of my fav players BTW) is not a good guy is a good thing for Chelsea because you cannot win anything with only good guys in the quad. You need some meanness to win.

Completely agree on Ba and Suarez on the human level. So, I reckon Ba should leave football and employ his good heart in some good cause. While Suarez, who is a gifted footballer, should remain in the game since knowing how to play football is really all that matters. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think that (guilty at the same level)? Because I certainly did not say it. :rolleyes: What I asked for is some consistency... don't treat our players like saints they are not. The fact Terry (one of my fav players BTW) is not a good guy is a good thing for Chelsea because you cannot win anything with only good guys in the quad. You need some meanness to win.

Completely agree on Ba and Suarez on the human level. So, I reckon Ba should leave football and employ his good heart in some good cause. While Suarez, who is a gifted footballer, should remain in the game since knowing how to play football is really all that matters. :D

wait,which one of them plays for chelsea who are a european giant in a european trophy while the other "gifted footballer" plays for a mid-table team who came what 7/8th last season in PL.

saying that we "cheated" for the first goal is childish, senile and downright stupid. and using this as an example to say that our players are "saints or not" is rubbish. i mean a player gets a favorable decision but he should stop the game and give the ball back? is that what u want? :fainthv9::fainthv9::fainthv9:

no one here is being inconsistent, except for u who are making a mountain out of a mole-hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait,which one of them plays for chelsea who are a european giant in a european trophy while the other "gifted footballer" plays for a mid-table team who came what 7/8th last season in PL.

saying that we "cheated" for the first goal is childish, senile and downright stupid. and using this as an example to say that our players are "saints or not" is rubbish. i mean a player gets a favorable decision but he should stop the game and give the ball back? is that what u want? :fainthv9::fainthv9::fainthv9:

no one here is being inconsistent, except for u who are making a mountain out of a mole-hill.

Please stop putting words in my mouth! When did I say he should have stopped the play?!? The same way I understand an aggressive player would play aggressively, in his natural way and not stop the play when he or some else thinks he's been too aggressive. That's up to the officials. How about not using your hand to being with?!?

Concerning Suarez, that's exactly the attitude that can weaken a team: our players are always better than the opposition.

If you think Ba is better than Suarez, then I rest my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please stop putting words in my mouth! When did I say he should have stopped the play?!? The same way I understand an aggressive player would play aggressively, in his natural way and not stop the play when he or some else thinks he's been too aggressive. That's up to the officials. How about not using your hand to being with?!?

Concerning Suarez, that's exactly the attitude that can weaken a team: our players are always better than the opposition.

If you think Ba is better than Suarez, then I rest my case.

did he use his hand? was is intentional (like suarez when he stopped the ball against ghana). it was accidental. an accidental touch. and for that u called ba a cheat, and said he assisted by "cheating". so what am i supposed to think?? the ball touched his hand, but there was no whistle, hence he played on. for THAT u called him a cheat, so what is the only other think he could have done, for u to not call him a cheat? i am not putting words into your mouth, i am just extrapolating your explanations which when seen from the other point of view, seems (in the least) bizarre.

the attitude that can actually weaken a team is that u r blasting a player, who starts after a month, plays well, infact was our most potent threat in the first half, and is still ridiculed.

i think ba is better than suarez FOR CHELSEA, because i cant fathom the dressing wars and splits when an egoistic, diving, cheating, cannibal like suarez joins CFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did he use his hand? was is intentional (like suarez when he stopped the ball against ghana). it was accidental. an accidental touch. and for that u called ba a cheat, and said he assisted by "cheating". so what am i supposed to think?? the ball touched his hand, but there was no whistle, hence he played on. for THAT u called him a cheat, so what is the only other think he could have done, for u to not call him a cheat? i am not putting words into your mouth, i am just extrapolating your explanations which when seen from the other point of view, seems (in the least) bizarre.

the attitude that can actually weaken a team is that u r blasting a player, who starts after a month, plays well, infact was our most potent threat in the first half, and is still ridiculed.

i think ba is better than suarez FOR CHELSEA, because i cant fathom the dressing wars and splits when an egoistic, diving, cheating, cannibal like suarez joins CFC.

You believe it an accidental touch. I believe it was not.

I think Ba is a terrible player; you don't.

You think Suarez being a cunt makes him a bad player, or a lesser player; I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You