Jump to content

Tomlewis7

Member
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by Tomlewis7

  1. Carlton Cole part two MUCH!?
  2. LMAO at the pizzaro beating bit . I dont know about shevva...As a bit part yes...But he doesnt ever want to be a bit part player...And Di Santo, and Sturridge should just be given his time to add to their own bit part player time to become more experienced. He may still have the heat for the EPL but i cant convince myself he can really help Chelsea as a club. For me him and Pizzaro should leave. Again, just my opinion.
  3. That was pure Admin Vs SuperMod
  4. Well yes....HE DOES! Apparently he is trying to sign to either sp*rs or Chelsea, as him and his lady Victoria have been looking at schools in London (i presume for their kids, not for David LOL). And he had a big fall out with some fans at last nights AC Milan friendly lol.
  5. Stoch will do well. "Mclown" does have a decent eye for young talent, he's taken on some other young up and coming players, along with the two Chelsea lads....From the fact he's been taken on the USA tour...Sinclair will now prove himself as a big boy...Stoch will go out and get experience for a year or two till he's 21, maybe for slightly longer till 22, and then he will really feature at Chelsea.
  6. This seems like a bizzare signing. From the videos he looks good, and from what ive seen on him elsewhere on the internet, he looks like a Kaka type player, but being played as a deep play maker like Pirlo...Seems to me like Ancelotti had something to do with this...Maybe we will get rid of Deco and Beletti and we need a player to fill our reserves...Because he's too old for any youth teams.
  7. Can we get an official qoute from the mum then??? Like Micheal Ballack, she can become his spokesperson.
  8. I dont think we need him, and he's not quite the marquee signing people like us Chelsea fans and John Terry would like to see. However he IS a good player, and can play down EITHER wing.
  9. Ricardo Carvalho told he's going nowhere adverts.addToArray("sky", "120x600,160x600"); Chelsea manager Carlo Ancelotti has told Ricardo Carvalho he is an important part of his plans and won't be sold. The defender has been pressing for a move all summer after accusing the club of not supporting him enough during his injuries last season. A move to Inter Milan has fallen through but Ancelotti feels the 31year-old still has a lot to offer and has taken him to the United States for the club's pre-season tour.
  10. David Beckham.............. ........... Only joking! From what ive read Athletico WOULD sell Aguero if the infamous "crazy offer" comes in...Which is his 55 million euro's buy out clause....And im guessing in pounds thats like what £47 million? Around the same we were offering for Pato...And also from what ive heard and seen we almost signed him at the start of the summer but his wage demands were too big...This, coming before all of the Galactico and Manchester...City.....spending. We should just meet the demands, we all seem to agree this guy would be a great signing....Ibrahimovic isnt my bag, i think he is way too expensive for his age, and too much like Drogba....From the way Inter have flown in for talks over Riccy C it looks like Zlatan wont be moving anyway. Pirlo is one player we are also heavily linked with...Again, we dont really need him, so much midfield talent, he wont have the time on the ball in the premier league to be a deep midfield play maker, especially whilst ignoring defensive duties. Besides that theres only Luis Fabiano who we have been linked with, again not a bad player, but not the creative player we need. The only solution for me is to beg like bitches for Aguero...Otherwise maybe Ashley Young...Stick him on the right wing?
  11. I agree with the majority of the comments in this topic....NO THANKYOU! Stay at Inter...If we have valued Calvalho and Deco at £10 million....And they are happy with that...Just concede that extra 4 and sell them both to Inter. We can buy Aguero or Pato (which...by the way, id prefer if it was Aguero) with a bit of the money...Get rid of the deadwood at the club in Deco...Then if JT does leave we can then use that money to help pay for the Aguero/Pato move, and then use the rest of the transfer budget for one really good defender to go along side Alex/Ivanovic..And give Mancienne his chance at the club finally. To sum up.... IBRAHIMOVIC NO! Too old, too much like Drogba, and for his age...At THAT price....No thankyou. If this is Chelseas idea of a Marquee signing to impress JT and the fans....Then you have got it ALLLLLL WRONG!
  12. I read that the transfer was only stalled because the company had to make sure that all of the third party ownership of Tevez had been sold off/removed before Man City sign him. He is also supposed to be back in Manchester after his holiday to have his medical in the next 48 hours....Looks like the Tevez chase is over =[
  13. What do you think about this? Im not saying its by any means true, but if it is...what are your opinions on the matter. http://bitterandblue.blogspot.com/2009/07/...g-momentum.html
  14. MY BAD! Bring on the dream Warnie! (i hope not wet.....). Man U are after Aguero now....Supposedly offering £30 Million and NANI for him....Which the chairman has rejected the offer and then claimed that there wasnt any kind of offer and an offer like that WOULD be rejected anyway. Looks like flakey Ferguson cant afford him..BUT WE CAN....Buy out clause for the win! Dooo it R.A.
  15. If we have the chance to sign Pato or Aguero then Man City can keep SCARLOS Tevez. But i doubt we could land either ofd those big name young signings, and Man U are after Aguero now too (Crap...). So maybe we should really push for Tevez! Go on son, you know you want Champions League football!
  16. Warnie im afraid Wood's has just signed for Leyton Orient today, so thats one midfielder out of your dream team (which, by the way, i love the look of). I dont want Ribery either...Too expensive, especially when we can get younger arguably more talented players for less. And its not what Chelsea need with Joe Cole returning to fitness...We need that creative second striker...The Rooney role. That why id say go for Aguero because to me he fits that role the best out of him or Pato....Dont get me wrong there bot incredible players, but i think Pato played as a main striker last year. We would be paying the same price for Aguero's buy out clause as the amount of money we are throwing at A.C. Milan as they make us look silly playing games with us...They wont sell him unless its rediculously high...Probably the same as our final "take it or leave it" Ribery bid.....A player who doesnt want to play in England because of the climate. Aguero wants to play for us, his chairman will let him go if the offer is met...Its just his reportadly high wage demands that stalled talks with him before. Just meet his funking demands, we all know he'd be worth it. Its time for Chelsea to show some transfer market bollocks and take the superstar risk...We all know it would pay off, he has the final quality to make our team THE best in the world. And when Drogba throws a sulk next season he can leave, Anelka will probably go elsewhere, and then we have Sturridge and Di Santo (with his premiership experience from a hopefully soon to go through loan move to Blackburn where fat sam could definatly get the most out of a target man striker as he always does). Sorry for writing so much...Ill STFU now
  17. David Beckham! Because...He's shit...and he's very "Marquee"
  18. I like his signature though...Thats a cool picture!
  19. Ribery can play down the right cant he? He is right footed im 90% sure!
  20. I have read a lot today about this supposed player being Ribery. We have slapped a final bid of around £40 million on the table for him in a "take it or leave it" final offer attempt. Now, Ribery is a great player, but he wants to go to only one place, Spain. Secondly, 26 isnt old, but buy footballing standards 26 is old, and if we are going to pay £40 million-50 million euros for any player, id rather it be a younger player in Pato or Aguero, so we get more years out of them, and we can help them into the most successful phase of their careers at Chelsea, rather then having a sulky (and pretty ugly...but thats not his fault, he was in a car crash when he was like 7) at the club. And also, to Mungii, i say we just look at the good part of the transfers, as Chelsea will only let him make THOSE kind of signings, because of the squad that we already have (which is full of names of the quality of the first list of signings you mentioned). And he got Ronaldinho to come to Ac Milan....He's still a great player and was at the peak of his career (if not his form) when they signed him...He CAN lure big players to football clubs.
  21. ^^^^^ PWNED! And also, this forum is for discussions of anything, even the unlikely non realistic signing of Pato, so discuss...we shall! We may actually get him, A.C Milans chairman has made offers for Dzeko and Luis Fabiano, so they are after two strikers...Maybe they might let Pato go if we pay out the ass, with him most likely being this "MARQUEE NAME" signing the chairman of Chelsea is after.
  22. That situation doesnt worry me too much. A.C Milan had little money, and in Italy players play till they are really old because of the speed of the league. He couldent afford to change it drastically. We already have a better younger squad, most of those players he didnt bring in, they were already there for his reign. And we can see already with the first three signings his intention for young talented players. I do feel a bit of your worry though that the player wont be young. But we can only hope, and i trust Chelsea's judgement on what a "block buster" signing is. It will be a talented young player, i second you on Aguero
  23. Lets hope you are right. You never known with Chelsea. But i have to say we seem to have learnt from our mistakes tansfer wise and Ancelotti loves bringing youth players in and building a good young squad for the future, as he confirmed in one of the press conference atricles on the internet somewhere by talking about building the team for the now and future. Either way, the fact that we are promised one big signing is almost pant wettingly excited..We could have been seen as greedy to even ask for any more additions to the squad after the three great players we have to add to our team....Im gonna say this right now, put my neck on the line, i prefer Aguero as a player over Pato. Pato doesnt look like a winger/striker, or even a footballer...I dont know why, he just doesnt LOL.
  24. I get this horrible feeling its neither Aguero or Pato, more someone lame we dont need like Pirlo. I would love to see Pato, but if the Ac Milan board are to extend his contract and discard any bid of any price we put on the table, then we shouldent bother going for him...We dont need to be made to look even more stupid then chasing around Milan asking what price? We've been rumoured to be offering near 50 something million pounds for him. Forgive me if im wrong...But Aguero's buy out clause is 55 million...He said too like Pato that he would love to play for Chelsea, and this time the chairman said if the buy out clause is met (and probably his redicilous wages, which may have stopped us before) then he can go. Yes he may be two years older, but has much more Champions League and Internation experience. However if we get either of these i will be happy. And as good as he is Dzeko is a no go for me, not the player we need...And not a "marquee or blockbuster" signing.
×
×
  • Create New...