NishC300

Worthless scumbags and what's even worse is that some of them do it considering it's a 'joke'. Yea let's if see that other c*** dares bring an SR-25 to the bridge. Deserves to have his brains blown off..... Tbh I dunno how a c*** like that would even be able to afford an SR-25, must be too busy playing COD 16 hours a day and thinks it's reality.

I think there are just as many stupid adults dragging down the quality of the forum...... Just reading his letter right now, the only thing that disappoints me was that I wanted to see Lamps, Cech and Drogba retire as Chelsea players. Gonna miss Petr so much, really loved him. He isn't just a world class player but also a great human being, he's actually learnt numerous languages just so that he can help players from foreign countries who can't speak English. I guess it's just as Petr said, sometimes in life things just don't go exactly like you want them to..... If they did then so many players who served us so well would have won a CL crown (like Ballack), Lampard would still be a Chelsea player, Drogba would have scored another Wembley goal in the Capital One Cup Final and well Cech would still be here. Thibaut has some big shoes to fill, but I'm confident he'll be up to the task! What if he's Mourinho's agent? Maybe he sent him to Arsenal on a mission, like spying on their tactics etc haha

David Horowitz didn't write that article. And even if he did, what the hell does that even matter? The article simply states what happened in a court case, does it really matter who wrote it? Or is that just a typical technique by progressives to avoid facts? But the thing that's concerning is that we've now changed the definition of marriage to just "two people who love each other", all I'm trying to say is this could be easily exploited by many people simply in order to gain benefits. Anyway my original point was more to do with how I'd rather this was legalised by states themselves than through a court. As for the 1st paragraph which you sent to Fernando, here's an interesting article http://www.truthrevo...me-sex-marriage. I'm not saying all homosexual parents are like this, I'm actually quite sure they're a minority however this is a genuine concern for traditional marriage believers, and regarding the child abuse thing unfortunately there is a staggering amount of evidence that despite being a small minority they do commit a disproportionately large number of offences. Now ofc this is just giving a bad name to most of them, as many just go along with their daily business without interfering in other's lives, however you can fully understand people's like @Fernando, 's concerns.

but then you have straight couples who are relatives as well? Many people simply marry their relatives too. Here was a court case in which the children testified against their parents. http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/children-gay-parents-testify-against-same-sex-marriage Would recommend quite a few people to see the potential scenarios for bigotry against religious people. I'm not ofc claming all gays are like this, but this could open the door for attacking people's religious freedom. Homophobic rhetoric? How is claiming that the SCOTUS has no right to legalise same sex marriage but is something that should be decided by states - homophobic? Goodness me, classic tactics to just begin name calling when people run out of arguments..... __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Read this article on why a gay couple sued a bakery for causing 'mental rape'. It forced that bakery to shut down and the owners went bankrupt. In their lawsuit, the two women claimed they felt “mentally raped,” as part of a list of 88 symptoms of emotional distress they experienced at being refused a cake. The long list of symptoms included “acute loss of confidence,” “doubt,” “excessive sleep,” “felt mentally raped, dirty and shameful,” “high blood pressure,” “impaired digestion,” “loss of appetite,” “migraine headaches,” “pale and sick at home after work,” “resumption of smoking habit,” “shock,” “stunned,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “weight gain” and “worry.” Link in spoilers http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/26/lesbian-couple-accuses-christian-bakers-of-mental-rape-awarded-135000/ btw on a lighter note, here's a video on how 'Nazi' some of this treatment of these bakers is,

You guys make great points and personally I've been quite critical of Oscar in the past. The thing with him is he produces these moments of absolute magic (especially near the beginning of the season), where you think he is truly one of the most talent players in the world - with incredible potential like that cup game against Stoke last year, what happened right after that though...... That's basically the only thing that's keeping him here, it's just such a shame cos you are almost dying to see him produce those moments of magic again, but they are so sporadic we almost forget about them. He's had the 'overworked' thing in favour of him, unfortunately next year he won't have that excuse with him anymore, thus I guess next year is a real 'make or break' for him in terms of his Chelsea career. I'm genuinely clinging onto the hope that the only thing that has held him back all these years is how he's been ridiculously overworked, he's just one of those wonderful footballers you really love and don't want to see leave the club.....

Well in many cases of pedphilia there is consent by the kid (wasn't that what allegedly happened in the Adam Johnson case [even though I think it turned out to be a hoax by an attention seeking kid]), also I don't really know how you can understand whether the animal accepts it or not in zoophilia ;p But the issue is that other sterile relationships like let's say two sisters just happily living together could claim they are married so they can get state marriage benefits. And then they say Christian Conservatives are ridiculous when they say there is an attack on Christianity. I'm not Christian but some of this discrimination is worrying. The problem is people show little sympathy for those they don't agree with, as if they're not human..... It's all part of this new era of political correctness. Where we have to pretend to be offended by everything. This is ofc according to progressives is 'progress'. Recently I read an article on how feminists ruined a scientist's career because he cracked some joke about his wife or something. Will try and find that article. How about the religious institutions that are now being bullied by the left? Indeed, people need to realise that the only reason we have 'peace' is because there are people out there making sure we do...... We sit around in peace because other risk their lives and are out there guarding our borders and protecting our freedom. That's one of the reasons I find cutting defence spending quite shocking.

Indeed that's such an unfortunate stat..... and I was just pointing out that generally religious families have lower divorce rates Edward Gibbons wrote in "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" that a rise in divorce rates in Rome was one of the reasons regarding the fall of the Empire.

Not everyone who wants to protect traditional marriage is a homophobe, there are several families who are just concerned and want to protect the true definition of marriage. If anything some of the the biggest anti-gay bigots are from left. The Westboro Baptist Church's "God Hates Fags" are firm Democrats! The founder and leader of the Church (died last year), Fred Phelps was a big supporter of Clinton and Gore. Yes I am aware that the judicial branch of government merely 'interprets' the constitution, as for what you say in paragraphs 1-3, I recommend you read Justice Scalia's statement which I pasted earlier in spoilers as that sums up a lot of what I wanted to say and if you still have something to attack then you can respond. Also finally the main point here isn't whether you agree with this or not, it's how all of a sudden the SCOTUS is a becoming a threat to Federalism which protects the autonomy of states. This matter should never be decided by a court but within the respective states. Human rights? Were homosexuals being discriminated like the African American community in the US? This is why I fail to understand why it is compared to the Civil Rights Movement (which is even more ironic as MLK was firm believer in traditional marriage). The point isn't that straight couples can still marry in peace, it's the fact that now you have redefined an age old definition of marriage which was the union between a man and a woman. By claiming that it's the union between two people who love each other you cause some severe confusion, should we now call two sisters who live together marriage as well? I love my parents, is that marriage as well? Do you not see how others could easily exploit this for their benefit? Those sisters might as well ask for the benefits the state bestows on married couples too. I remember coming across a list of scenarios of things that could happen if gay marriage was legalised, shame I didn't read it nor can I find it now ..... Furthermore you could have scenarios as what Fernando claimed below Have you also read about the new sex ed programmes that are being forced on families where children are taught all kinds of things regarding sexuality from a young age? Do you really want more sexual confusion in this era? Do you want to force children of traditional families to accept what these families consider 'immoral behaviour'? These reasons and what Fernando stated are why people are furious that their religious freedom is under attack. Essentially this is an attack on Christian morality (I'm personally Hindu and Hinduism states nothing regarding homosexuality, if anything gay rights activists claim Hinduism tolerates homosexuality). What about Christian skepticism regarding the following? How long until the supreme court legalises those as well (and no I'm not saying that homosexuals are any of the things stated below!) "If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior?" A perfect example of how undemocratically legalising something causes strife.... Clearly it would have been better if states were allowed to deal with this matter themselves.... If you're gonna legalise gay marriage, make sure the states decide that! If anything, conservative states are right to think that this is discrimination against them. As for brainwashing, there is no brainwashing against gay marriage. Schools now have major programmes to promote homosexuality and as well as all kinds of Gay-Straight Alliances. The only people discriminated against now are the ones who want to protect traditional marriage, anyone who even dares stand up for their beliefs is punished by the 'GAYstapo'. Have you been reading about all the religious families who've had their ENTIRE CAREERS RUINED because they refused to serve a gay couple as it opposed their religious beliefs? There are countless stories of this, people's careers ruined by the politically correct because they stood up for what they believed was the morally correct...... Look at some of the horrific and disgusting things said about religious people. Imagine if someone religious said this about homosexuals? We'd never hear the end of it! The media would be on it for days! The media loves creating this picture of a victim and a victimiser for publicity, when in reality there are just as many anti-Christian bigots on the pro-gay side of things. CNN (something which they themselves accepted) did more to promote the legalisation of gay marriage than to protect the definition of marriage. So NO! There is no brainwashing occurring to protect marriage, if anything you could claim the complete opposite. And no I don't receive FOX News ;p (as a matter of fact I don't even watch TV) and all my views are entirely my own and I don't mindlessly follow everyone else or jump onto bandwagons (something which you could ask my friends about in depth lol regarding new trends like selfies, snapchat etc which I refuse to take part in) Furthermore, there are quite a few atheists who believe in traditional marriage too, so this isn't just a 'baseless religious belief' as many like to label it. One of my close friends is an atheists who supports traditional marriage. I hope I didn't miss anything out, if I did just notify me on the next post. Thank you very much for the compliment, I really appreciate it and have to say you too are a fine individual evident from your fine performance as a moderator. Yes I agree polls aren't always accurate. I answered some of your post above as for the final statement, I don't think it will cause divorce rates to fall. Most of the believers of traditional marriage are very religious families and they are usually very tightly knit and divorces are quite rare among them as they firmly believe in the sanctity of marriage. It's a conservative principle though to respect the military. Generally I've always had this feeling that the British Conservative Party doesn't really stand up for conservative principles. All the consequences of the Tories' cutting defence spending are indeed quite shocking.

Nothing ever gets decided The fighting just keeps going on and on ;p

Just clicked on this cos of the JFK photo haha

Pellegrini is easily one of the biggest hypocrites in the Premier League as well as being a disgusting sore loser. Some of his disgusting comments about Mourinho are 'ignored' by the media. Could you imagine the state of the media if Mourinho had been saying all that about Pellegrini?

Ok here are my replies, the replies of some of your posts maybe under other people's quotes too. How do gay people have different rights to everyone else? Why do people out there like to pretend as though they are treated like inferior humans when clearly they're not (in Western Society at least)? When was a homosexual's business shut down? When was a homosexual's career ruined just because they stood up for their religious beliefs? Majority of people against it? The people GOVERN THEMSELVES it is not the duty of 9 UNELECTED judges to make the decisions on behalf of an ENTIRE REPUBLIC. That's what we elect representatives for. As Justice Scalia said regardless of whether you believe this in traditional marriage or not, the matter of concern here is that this a blatant attack on American democracy. If you were against the legalisation of marriage, I bet you wouldn't be cheering this result, you'd be moaning about how the court are a bunch of idiots etc. The point isn't whether it's been legalised or not BUT HOW IT HAS BEEN LEGALISED. That's not true, I would like to know where you found this 'overwhelming' majority stat when more than 30+ states believe in the right to protect traditional marriage. I just wrote something above on how they are encroaching people's freedom, it's not just the result of this that matters, but how people are showing little regard for the true meaning of being a republic. Legalising gay marriage isn't as simple as many people make it out to be, you are essentially redefining the entire definition of marriage and with it, in future you could have severe repercussions. No it wasn't. The 10th Amendment clearly states that it is the job of state governments to look after these matters and this court decision makes absolutely no sense. Who gives 5 unelected judges the right to make a decision on how society views marriage? This hasn't got anything to do with whether you believe in traditional marriage or not, it is the job of these politicians to protect people from judicial tyranny. The American constitution wants people to have the right to govern themselves! Not have some undemocratic judges make the laws for everyone. I don't get what you're implying in bold sentence. If people can't govern themselves then who will? A bunch of unelected Ivy League law students? Here's Justice Scalia's full statement I agree. There were people in my year who claimed soldiers are the most horrid people in the world cos she saw a YouTube video of some soldier doing something horrid. Disgusting how easily people's opinions are influenced. The men and women who join the Armed Forces are some of the finest people alive and it's shame so many now, treat them with such little respect. "If you repeat a life often enough, it will become the truth."

Love this joke. My mother often gets sent these jokes by relatives and friends on her WhatsApp and shows them to me (yes a teenager like me doesn't have a WhatsApp but my mother does ;p) ok here's one (translating it from Hindi and it also included some references to Indians coming from certain states in India [indian users will understand] so I'll instead use other nationalities ,and currencies, as a rough equivalent) ____________________________________________________________________________________ A (insert nationality) sees two notes on the street, a $5 one and a $10 one. Which one should he pick up?

Shocked that there are people here who are actually cheering the result of the legalisation of gay marriage by the court. Regardless of whether you support it or not, the real concern here is how they've yet again undermined the value of democracy! They are basically robbing people of the freedom to govern themselves! The court shouldn't be deciding whether to legalise it or not but instead it should be the state governments that look after it themselves and vote on it! If anything you could also argue that by doing this you are undermining the 1st amendment which protects religious freedom....

Any chance of this league restarting in the near future?

How come you lost respect for Frank? Frank was released by the club and loaned by an MLS Club to M.City. Nah not even Cech is that great

http://limetorrenturls.com/We-are-the-Champions--Chelsea-fc-Season-Review-2014-15-torrent-6354371.html Try this one (haven't tried it myself). There were no seeders though..... EDIT: found another link but it has just 1 seeder https://kat.cr/we-are-the-champions-chelsea-fc-season-review-2014-15-t10840510.html

ah I remember the 'Lampard is a cunt' debate. I remember having a big post on that when he was loaned to City to help settle the argument between both sides! Well this thread is always free of fighting

Hello everyone. How's everyone? Hope you are all enjoying your summer (or winter if you're in the Southern Hemisphere). It's a shame I've not been active enough on this forum for the past year...... Generally not been active on the Internet, not been tweeting as much as I used to or anything..... How have things changed here?

Really appreciate it guys! Thank you very much to each and everyone one of you! Would appreciate if you could share with as many people as possible. Hopefully I'll be able to produce something which you guys could find useful.

Hi guys! How are you all doing? I would appreciate it if you could answer this survey for me. It's part of what I'm doing for the Junior Achiever Award (an EU Economics Project). Please only answer this if you are a school or university student. IT WILL ONLY TAKE A FEW SECONDS. Thanks! https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1n8xGvnmtTc4_DM_VotuQf8obJCiAXyIothZvhVCGGx4/viewform

What did he eat this summer?

If someone was to ask me question 6 as well, I'd just copy paste this answer and give it to them ;p Here's quite a strange question, but it's all I can think of (excuse me for my lack of creativity after a tiring day and since it's almost 11 now). If you were given a billion USD what would you do with it? and here's one purely inspired from the weird conversations I have with my friends, but would you like to rob Fork Knox?

What's been impressive is the convincing manner we've been winning in as well as the fact that we've been winning. City, Liverpool or Arsenal have way more points than they deserve.

If Ars fans have delayed the game by letting of flares then surely those fans should suffer the consequences. Let'em miss the match!