Rmpr

Neither would I, but how much would we pay?

The only difference Hazard had to Neymar is that he played UCL and Neymar Libertadores. This is what is invalid: "Not to mention he is one of the brightest talents out there and was playing competively at a fragile age". Ligue 1 is not better than Brasileirao, vice-versa. If you take PSG off, no other French club would be champions in Brazil. We playing super "free", attacking football. This doesnt mean they are headless chickens, they are just reckless like Luiz (because it is our culture). Your jealosy for Neymar blinds you. You often tackle the stupid things the media say, I have never senn you criticizing actual tactical points or anything.

At the exact same post I quoted. You tried to get a dig at Neymar by saying Hazard had proved more than him... The problem I see you (and many others) have with Neymar is what the media sells you, and not what the kid really is! I wouldnt put him above a CM, ST, CB DM. But I think it is stupid (with all due respect) to say we are far from needing him, not even Barcelona and Real Madrid are being so snob (and we are far behind them).

He is similar to Neymar, yet Neymar is not needed and doesnt provide width... Not a top priority, but he is great. He goes all the way up to 5 stars on FM!

He provides width, one of his problems with Brazil is that he stays too close to the sideline and doesnt help with the build up often enough. Most of his assists are similar to this (low crosses): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WK4FZnMrz0 Hazard is older than Neymar dude, I dont see where your age argument fits. Neymar has been tearing apart Brazilian League, which is about the same level as Ligue 1. I dont see any major achievement from Hazard that outdones him. Both came/will come to Chelsea needing to prove themselves. Weird that you are using Hazard as an example, when you were criticizing him not long ago for not having done anything big enough yet in order to promote himself the way he did. We need a CM more than anything, but that doesnt mean we couldnt use Neymar. He is definetly not a priority, but is naive to say we are far from needing him...

He is playing on the RW now. No, he isnt experienced enough, nor is Hazard. We dont know that, just like any other transfer... We need more players, he gives you width and talent. We might very well need him!

Very down to Earth mate! Great Article! Some points I disagree though: I think we have been close to sign him, it just didnt happen. I think we CAN afford him, but only if we let go of some players. Torres, Lampard and JT's clause. Which is absurd, but we can! Buying Cavani doesnt mean Lukaku wont have space here, they have an 8 year gap. We have plenty games to rotate. I also dont believe Lewandoski is any better than having Lukaku + Ba.

Brazilians? Here, it is either win it or bust. Roy would have been fired for losing the Euros! LOOL P.S: Did you just quoted someone?

Hahaha, that and paintball are one of the best things to do with friends.

Is he injured?

Interesting question! Arsenal: 1. They are used to finishing top4, no big deal there. 2. Wenger would keep his job and his profit mantra. 3. AVB fucked up. 4. Bale gone and no UCL money or attraction to new players. I prefer Le Arse, but it is perfectly debetable...

16 has no problem at all!

Specially if he breaks the record (which is pretty achievable)...

I dont want to be rude or anything, but it got much better without the photos! Great Article!

@, it is done! Thank you, bye!

In Brazil, big is Chelsea and Manure, nobody cares about the rest!

I get that, but it wont change anything! People will have the same reactions for their first car, with 18 or 25. They WILL drive fast and reckeless... You are also not counting the amount of people that will illegaly drive in College. You know how things are at that age, it will only make things worse.

It wont have any effect, you are just postponing the same atitudes for when you are 23-24. I think 15-16 is a ridiculously young age to drive, but 18-19 is fairly normal. Yes, we do shit things (cant even say how much stupid things I did), but it is because car gives you a sense of freedom and superiority that we feel like superheroes. When you get older it becomes more natural and normal, so it just becomes one more boring thing in life (like an old toy). If you were only able to drive with 24 (or whatever), it could get actually worse. The same experience you get with 18, you will with 24 and you will still do the same stupid things with your friends. Why? Because even if you are more mature, the new toy speakes louder! But also, you restrict people's life too much, so many 18-23 yo will drive illegaly without knowing and that is way more dangerous...

Completely true!

Welcome to the forum! :blue scalf: 1. There is a lovely lady who might like to meet you. 2. I think you will get along with Backstreet09. 3. Stay away from Stingray!

No, I am not saying if it is good or bad in general. I was talking more like a "taste", whether it is good or bad for anyone personally. Understand? I agree with you, but I think people are to blame as well. I will talk about me, because I cant judge anyone else... I live in a city with 68km of tube (140km by 2015). Paris and London (who arent even 30% as big) have 200km+. You think can see you cant go everywhere using public transportation! However, there are a lot of people who have access to great (really great) public systems and just dont use it: I live 2-3 blocks away from the nearest station and my university has a station INSIDE (I dont mean close) the campus. Ask me how many times in the week I use it to go to USP? Many problems are not just the government's fault, people are to blame as well. It is just easier, cooler and more comfortable to take the car out of the garage... (I edited my previous post)

It was probably that "So?" at the beginning! Things are shit in Brazil, you would be laughed at for saying what you just posted!

What the actual fuck are you talking about? I did a joke smartass... I know how things are in Austria and I wouldnt have a car as well, just relax and be happy!

That is not true, you are mixing two different concepts there. One thing is to analyse the act of driving, whether it is good or not. The other is to analyse the need of a car... You start by saying you dont like driving because "real driving" is boring. Well, that is your opinion and that is perfectly resonable! I am from a city where 100km of traffic is normal, but I personally dont mind because driving is actually one of my hobbies. Alright, no problem is any of the points of view. However, you go from one point (the act of driving) to the need of driving. I agree with the Bogota's former mayor (and he is amazing, there is even a documentary about him on Discovery Channel), he is a very smart humble dude. I also agree with everything you posted. Nevertheless, this is a whole other discussion. We would be now discussing how cities are shit planned and why they are so and also how you get "addicted" by your need for car. Above everything else though, the people in general are just as guilty. We all get real lazy to use anyother transportation because driving is so easy. A lot of people have choice (including me) and they just decide to take the car out of the garage!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, What you just said makes no sense to a third world citizen... EDIT: Even in a developed country (aka, good public transportation), there is nothing like a car. Once you get a license (you will eventually), you will remember what I said.