so what was so idiotic about my view? maybe it was the fact that i completely destroyed the point you made! Was it idiotic and biased of me to point out the fact that United had 10 men behind the ball every time Chelsea had possession in your half! did that not happen or am i making that up? and is it idiotic and biased that i said that United were afraid to open up and go for the win and commit more players forward because they were worried about leaving gaps in midfield and defence for Chelsea's front 4 to exploit? no i don't think so! you for some reason believe that United were trying to play football and Chelsea just parked the bus! but you are way to biased to see that your team were also happy to settle for a draw! if that game was at Stamford Bridge Mourinho would have risked losing the game to try and win it, we would have gone for the win! United didn't want to do that, they were happy playing backwards and sideways passes and putting aimless crosses in the box and letting Rooney take pot-shots! but your clearly too biased to see that.