Everything posted by CHOULO19
-
"pic not to say" That's an anagram of "Stay on topic"!
-
The issue with selling Torres is not the fee but his wages. You can find someone who's willing to pay 15-20m for him but you won't find someone who will pay him 180k/wk. That's why I'm sure he's staying..
-
We're only paying teams 15m to take Torres? No one will ever accept that!
-
^^ Don't scare the boy away, you two! Welcome, Marshal. Good to have you around I assure you, not all our members are as 'colorful' as Alex and Steve there
-
Here's a list of everything I can cook, take your pick! No need to get violent. Let's try to be civilized here!
-
Yeah I meant 'win' in the more traditional way. I could even argue that even if they achieved their objectives they would not have won because they war would not be really over.
- 16,010 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'll quote you on that after the match!
-
I think you'll feel differently after Webb refs tomorrows game!
-
Totti is a great player, but he's an utter cunt! And he can get away with murder just because his name is Totti.
-
Good to see he played 30 mins off the bench for MK. Hopefully he'll start the next one.
-
Hoping he scores so he could get a start in the CL midweek.
-
No idea who that guy is.. They have women and children too you know? If you want to eradicate them just for their beliefs, how does that make you better than them? Extremists can not take action without some sort of local and regional political cover because they are, despite their number, a minority. Blow the cover over their heads and their numbers will decline.
- 16,010 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
We should have the players watch the ref decisions in the game at the bridge this season before the match for motivation!
-
I edited out the smileys for you both here and on the main site. But there were still spaces behind them and that is what we should look to exploit. I have a feeling Ba will do very well tomorrow.
- 7 replies
-
- FA Cup
- Manchester United
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yeah there was also a tweet along the lines of "Nigga you're gay" but I can't remember the full context. If those two tweets are the reason then it's good to see the club keeping a close eye on him.
-
No it was more along the lines of a slightly homophobic tweet. Can't remember the exact sentence now though.
-
I'm hoping it was just a disciplinary action to exclude him from the game after he made some "controversial" tweets last week. And it seems either he closed his twitter account or I can't find it for some reason..
-
because B ) (with out the space) is the code for smiley. Good article mate and some interesting points. I think if utd decide to give us possession we will struggle and will no doubt lose. However, seeing as they are playing at old toilet, their crowd will want them on the ball and that will give us a chance to win if we can exploit the space behind them.
- 7 replies
-
- FA Cup
- Manchester United
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I'm sorry, but that's historically incorrect. The concept of Jihad started with the Islam and doesn't have the meaning everyone in the world now thinks it does. "Jihad" from the Arabic word of "Ijtihad" means simply to work. In Islam it means to work for the good of the Muslim "omma" or nation in any way possible from scientific discovery to fighting for Islam. The reason "Jihad" is frightening is that in Islam, if the leader of the Muslim world or "Khalifa" (if he exists) calls for "Jihad" then every Muslim in the world has to obey. Right now luckily there is no "Khalifa" and no Islamic state. In modern history, "Jihad" was first stirred during WWI when the British (that's you guys ) asked the Muslim leader in what is now KSA to call for Jihad against the Ottoman Empire in return for a promise of a unified Arab state when the war was done (of course you guys had other plans for the middle east and another deal with the Zionists, but that's a debate for another day). Then in the 70s, "Jihad" was stirred again this time by the US to get the Muslims to fight against the Soviet Union. Of course when the war ended, they were left with a bunch of fearless and armed fighters who really don't like Christians; seems pretty obvious in hindsight doesn't it? And finally "Jihad" was once again used for political reasons this time by both Iran and the US after the invasion of Iraq (still waiting for that weapon of mass destruction to be found ) and both sides over did it this time and now there are armed Muslim extremists all over the middle east and north Africa and the US are still stupidly arming and financing them unaware that the situation has long gone out of hand.
- 16,010 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
You can never get rid of extremism. There will always be ignorant people who are willing to blow themselves up, and lots of them. But what you can stop are the not so ignorant people who actively arm and finance them just to gain some kind of political leverage be it Iran or the US or KSA..etc
- 16,010 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
There something going on behind the scenes regarding Feruz which is why he was not involved in yesterday's youth cup game.
-
Ah nice. But take it easy, old man
-
Don't tell me you think the US is in Afghanistan to 'win' a war? First, they can never get rid of the armed groups, they've always known that, it was never their objective; their objective was to establish a foothold near Iran. Second, even if they could, why in the world would they do that?! Muslim extremists are the US's new best friend! That is until they inevitably turn into another Qaida Just imagine if it were the US troops currently fighting and dying in Syria, that would cause a crisis in the US. Instead they have this endless supply of fearless ignorant and subsequently easily manipulated of fighters and all they need is to fund them from Arabian oil money. But the Americans are stupidly repeating the mistakes they made 40 years ago. Once the fighting is over these, now highly armed groups, will need some else to fight. It's in their ideology: every single one of them wants to die in battle because it's his ticket to heaven. And their next target will 100% be the "crusaders" and you will have a stronger Qaeda on your hands. We've already seen glimpses of that in the killing of the US ambassador in Libya. PS: I quoted the second part because I could help but laugh at your notion of South Korea being a "good" country! Did it eat its broccoli and do its chores?!
- 16,010 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
We, Lebanese people, are very "passionate" people! Where do you work, mate?