didierforever

but the most "hip and happening discussion" on this thread is "who will replace lampard", so this was my contribution to it...

excellent performance... 3 points have never felt better... plus what a treat to watch this game... but we still have a lot of problems while searching for the first goal... lamps is the key... his positioning, his movement can unlock those defences... another thing is that we have to make our chances count. we were kinda lucky today to get 2 own goals otherwise might have been the same story of creating chances, going one on one and then missiing and then conceding and kicking ourselves... motm - SUPER FRANKY LAMPARD...

now some1 tell me he is replacable, i dare you, i double dare you... FRANK LAMPARD IS IRREPLACABLE... fact... oscar might go on to become a great player but never like lamps... true legend...

SON OF A BITCH... WHAT A FUCKING SHOT.... HAZARD..........

now tell me that lamps is replacable,... oscar might go on to be a great player but THERE IS ONLY ONE LAMPARD... WHAT A FUCKING PERFORMANCE...

bertrand??? really? we need to break one of the best defences of pl and the fat spanish waiter starts with a 22 year old left back on the wing... awesome... only thing thats gonna save us today is a bit of a mata magic... COME ON JUAN... COME ON CHELSEA...

line up???

really? then please tell me about his efforts? the only time torres put in some effort was in the start of this season and the last season where he thought he could start afresh but when those starts dint work and when the going got tough, he was the first to surrender... can u actually tell me that since novwmber torres has put in any effort, in corianthians, in his last 5 matches???

did u just compare torres to IVANOVIC... what a slap on my serb's face... the difference between the blonde whore and IVA is that after putting in a bad performance and almost costing his team a cup, one just shrugs his shoulders and gets on with his life while the other seemed distraught and near to tears and would be raring to go and amend things in any way possible...

u just know that iva is gonna score...

dint he sign for shakhtar???

going? when, where, which idiotic club is so mind numbingly stupid to make a mistake of this degree?

most of the people here are upset with his effort and attitude on the pitch and that does not depend on any injury, be it career threating or a minor niggle...

to a certain extent we, the chelsea fans, have to take the blame. as you said, we gave unconditional support and love to torres with him never showing any real desire to play for the club. this just gave our board the green light to do as they saw fit when it was pro-torres, if this boo-ing and torres hate, had come earlier in the season we would have seen sturridge get more chances, or something different being tried... but now the situation has gone overboard with simply no turning back...

what a bitch this guy is...

cant dude... its tooo sad... every1 with so much hope looking forward to the next match and stuff...

going to get bullied off the ball, mata and hazard are going to have a damn hard time. kenwyn jones flanked by walters and kightly would give our defence run for their money. all in all a game from which i am not expecting anything except getting all our players back to london fit and fine (with the exception of the blonde whore).

he is earning 200k per week... if he has a career threatning injury, then he should retire and stop ripping chelsea off. if he is willing to play, taking insane amount of wages, the fans expect something out of it irrespective of how bad his injuries are.

just read some of the posts in the first pages... @dodojojo and @tomo-91 seem to be the biggest torres fans there ever were...

i have not seen @rafafan or @rupert on here for sometime now... where are they hiding?

oh great... now stoke... dont expect much from this game...

everybody look, the blonde whore's pimp is here...

i thought the discussion was about torres and if it was roman and the board's decision to play him or not. that is why i said what i said.

sturridge was our only other option upfront. the performances torres was putting should have had him warming the bench long long ago. irrespective of how high any manager rated sturridge, something different should have been tried and under normal circumstances would have been tried.

it was a part of a big conversation about y we are sticking with torres and if its the manager's doings or they are doing it on the board (aka roman's) bidding.