didierforever

i can already visualize a trio of hazard-oscar-willian against big teams on away fixtures. counter the hell out of the teams.

90 mil??? i would not listen to an offer less than 100mil and if its tottenham, double it.

u do know how counters are done. it is done by inviting the players of the opposition team to attack, commit their players to the attack and then either by a long ball (if u have DD) or burst of pace (like we did today). u dont do it by pushing a team like bayern up the pitch, u genius caveman!!! also our conceding had nothing to do with our tactics, it was a piece of brilliance. secondly we had control of the game, which does not mean having the ball or possession. we were good on counters. we were looking like the more probable team to score everytime we started a counter. on the other hand, we reduced bayern to no chances and long shots. that is what control of the game means.

our counter attacks after the first goal were exactly like the one before the goal. tell me how the first goal was scored. hazard with a driving run thru the center finds schurrle on the wing who drills in a cross to find torres who scores. who played the ball to hazard-torres from an iva throw in (i think). OUR FRONT 3. no one else from the team had the last 4 touches or was even 20-30 yards from the goal expect from our front 4 ie, hazrd, torres,schurlle, oscar. and what about our counters after the goal, same things, nothing changed. the front 4 still remained as dangerous but could not find the last ball. there were a couple of counters after the goal which proves this just like the ones before the goal. i am starting to doubt if u r really a troll or simply THAT STUPID.

ohhhh,,, i get it... i ll try to speak to him in his goo-goo-ga-ga language.

in the match, he was brilliant. but the way he consoled lukaku after the match... hats off,,, future captain...

kudos to the future cap (luiz not romelu.)... the way he consoled him,,, brilliant.

oh... u mean wrong in the head...

OH GREAT ONE... we were playing the champions of EUROPE. who fucked barca 7-0 on counters. and you want us to commit more men to the attack when we are already 1-0 up. BRILLIANT. also i think your initial problem was that we dint COUNTER ATTACK AT ALL and simply parked the bus or as u put it "we dint try to get a goal"... yet now you say we should have let more players join the attack. cant u say your level of stupidity in the statements. u are not even a good troll. stupid-troll would be perfect for u.

i know, that was what i too said, the "4 on 3" chance.

unsuccessful counters like the one where we were 4 on 3. huh??? also when you play a counter attacking game you generally have just 1 or 2 players in the box specially when its pretty clear only our top 4 were involved in the attack. after the first goal, it was still us pretty much causing bayern a hell lot of problem. you really have a hard time understanding english. or just like to act stupid???

dude,,, he is a troll... let him be. i have had the same discussion with him. gave him instances when we had chances like the 4 on 3 where torres' cross was not good. but he just stopped replying and is now having the same argument with u.

yup, i think jose should have subbed off cahill for mata. LETS GO ATTACK. should be our motto.

Rubber bullets, on 31 Aug 2013 - 03:52 AM, said: 4 on 3 is not half chances. even a decent ball (not a good or a great ball) would have led to a goal then. we on the other hand frustrated bayern and forced them to shoot from range. if we had half chances, they dint even have that. chelsea was the team that was looking more probable to score than bayern. also plan B- is when plan A fails. i seriously dont think that happened today. that was the last time u replied to my post and my reply to it. its still in the thread a couple of pages back. go and have a look. seems u r here just to pass some time,,, heh TROLL...

our team seems to play with a lot of "heart" too... so why not...

i think i explained it you dude? u have not answered me on my last post yet, but are now having the same argument with a different poster. UNBELIEVABLE.

i dont know if mandzukic and muller were in the box, will have to see it again. but i am not being "picky" here. ribery cut in, took a couple of touches, unchallenged , shot and scored with rambo barely yards away. a DM whose main defensive job would have been stop that. kroos, muller, i can understand. but not to pick on ribery. as i said before unacceptable for me. also PICKY, no way.

ribery got the corner. you cant blame cech for it.he could have made the stop but it would have been an AMAZING stop. so cech is not to be blamed (at all) or atleast majorly for the goal. ramires could not have let ribery run at the defence and take a shot like that so easily. ribery was god's sake. i mean a DM has to know his responsibilty and i am sure one of the main things jose would have told lamps and rambo to do was to close both the wingers down quickly. it was not like this was ribery's first half shot. in that he got laid off and it was a first touch shot, here rambo let him cut in and run, which is unaccpetable.

hahahahahaha... no threat upfront. after going 2-1 up, and we officialy letting go of even thinking of attacking, you wanted lukaku to attack, and believe me he almost pulled it off when he took 3 bayern players on, went past them and it was lahm (right back) who cleared the ball out on the left edge of the box. NO THREAT UPFRONT?? he played as a right back for the last 10 minutes. we used the very formation rdm used against barca. 6-3-0 with oscar-mikel-lamps while lukaku and hazard as 2nd full backs. so who did you want him to close down?? need to get off the stuff you are on dude...

how was a 2nd yellow. fuck the ref. but overall another poor performance. even before the red, he was not good. how did he get the wrong side of ribery and let him shoot. the goal was his mistake. the DM role is not for him, specially in big matches.

the same RM fans who were so happy over the international cup win. yes something is better than nothing . but the point was this something is nothing to lose sleep over. and the end of the day it does not matter. if you give me a choice of choosing only one win - a PL win over any team or today's match, i would take PL in a heartbeat. thats how much worth this match is of.

motm for me. was just brilliant. and any1 who knows me would die of shock. but he was truly brilliant. link up play was marvellous. his goal was well taken. but most importantly, his workrate was good and he was a aerial challenge for dante. made life miserable for the bayern defenders.

so RM will be very happy with their super cupa (or whatever it is) last year, inspite of losing, la liga, copadel ray and CL. this "trophy" means nothing. its just for the record books. except for that NOTHING.

4 on 3 is not half chances. even a decent ball (not a good or a great ball) would have led to a goal then. we on the other hand frustrated bayern and forced them to shoot from range. if we had half chances, they dint even have that. chelsea was the team that was looking more probable to score than bayern. also plan B- is when plan A fails. i seriously dont think that happened today.

the only thing that tells me is, WE WON A EUROPEAN TROPHY 2 YEARS IN A ROW. and please, this thing is as worthless as a community shield or german cup and all that jazz. glorified friendlies. nothing more.