Peace.

What is funny, is that they are claiming to "defend England & all", but they can't speak a proper english. I (and nearly all the foreign members here) could speak a better english than this guy.

Yeah ! If I do recall correctly, it was in october 2010, though I can't remember against who. I only remember he was, hmm, poor xD. He wasn't to do all by himself.

I managed to gather random information : It will be applied to the big polluters. The tax will be up to 23 AUD per ton of CO2 ( 23 AUD => €17,2 / £15 ). Nearly 500 polluting companies will be taxed. Agricultural and forest companies won't be taxed. They will create a fund to finance the decarbonization of the country of 10 billions (I presume it is in AUD, so £6,5 billions). This fund will be used to : provide fiscal assistance and advices in purpose to decrease the energy consumption of the households ; provide compensations for mining/electrician/steelmaker companies ; provide an assistance to the development of the renewable energies. In 2015, this tax should leave the way to the quota of CO2 emission. Julia Gillard, the prime minister, hopes to decrease the CO2 emission of 150 millions of tons (untill 2020). I hope to have answered... And sorry for the broken english, the vocabulary used isn't familiar to me..

Someone passed me the following link and I thought I would share it with you : « Right now a major fight for our future is blowing up in Australia -- the government is about to pass a law that would dramatically cut carbon emissions and get polluters to foot the bill. But big businesses, backed by Rupert Murdoch, who owns nearly three-quarters of Australia’s press, are trying to kill the bill. This carbon price legislation is clever and is the latest great solution to our climate crisis -- it will push polluters towards clean and efficient production while supporting Australian families. And if we win in Australia we can inspire our leaders across the globe to adopt similar laws. Our best chance to influence this climate clash is to drown out Murdoch’s fear-mongering across the media with our messages of hope from across the world, and save the law. This battle is being fought on the Australian air waves right now. Sign the urgent petition to support this bold initiative -- when we reach 250,000 signatures, we’ll run inspiring radio ads that deliver our messages and dispel the myths about this carbon price legislation. » So basically, if you could sign the petition, it will be well appreciated. And that won't even take you 10 secondes of your time. For those who are interested, here you go : - Sign the Petition - Thanks ~

What the hell is "Muslamic" ??

Who is asking for a Lampard 2.0 ? Nobody. People are just asking for someone to play instead of him, not to impersonate him...

That is maybe not a bad new actually. Like this, we will have to play our youngsters

Once again, his performance was abysmal with France. I do not get how he is still being picked. Each and every time he gets the ball, he loses it within five second. He seriously has to be benched, both with France and Chelsea.

Come on, do not start over this "racial" thing. They may have other origin than the german one, but they have grew up in Germany, they have learn football in german clubs.

To be frank, I couldn't care less about the title. As long as we end up within the first four place, I'll be happy. Though, what I am interested in, it is the build of a new era, a new squad, with young and quality players. So, for me, to judge whether our season has been a good one or a shitty one, I won't look at the table. I'll look at the composition of our team. Indeed, If players like Drogba, Anelka, Malouda, Lampard and Kalou are still playing a major part in the starting eleven, while the young players (McEachran, Bertrand, Romeu, Lukaku and Danni (I no longer considere him as a youngster, but you see what I mean)) haven't play that much, and haven't been integrated to a certain level in the starting XI, then I'll say we had a bad season, even if we have finished second or first. And I'll go further. I even wish the club isn't aiming to win the title. Why do I wish such a thing ? Because I do believe it won't go well with the aiming of construct something new. Finaly, I do not think we are strong enough to win the league. But if we win it, then André Villas-Boas will have achieved something really, really great.

^ I get it. We should lock all our young players in a strong-box, so they can't do mistakes, so we can't critisize them. More seriously, I do not think that any member on here would say "we should have played Ferreira at LB" if Bertrand makes a mistake.

^ Don't be too much optimistic, Chalobah is barely 17 years-old.

The only thing German lacks, it is some balls. They are incredible talents, but they doesn't have the german spirit, they are too much nice imo.

Ah okay, apologies then As I didn't included players older than 26 years-old and you had posted just below my post, i thought..

Did I say he was old ? All United key players are [20 ; 26 ] ∩ [30 ; 35+] years old. Just a comparison.

Players who are < 21 years-old : Manchester United :iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiChelsea : - Phil Jones - 19iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii- Lukaku - 18 - De Gea - 20iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii- McEachran - 18 - Welbeck - 20iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii- Romeu - 19 Players who are between 21 and 26 : Manchester United : ggggggggggg Chelsea : - Smalling - 21gggggggggggggggg- Bertrand - 22 - Rafael - 21gggggggggggggggggg- Sturridge - 22 - Fabio - 21ggggggggggggggggggi- Mata - 23 - Cleverley - 22gggggggggggggggii- Luiz - 24 - Evans - 23dddddddddddddddddi- Ramires - 24 - Anderson - 23ddddddddddddddii- Mikel - 24 - Hernandez - 23gggggggggggggg- Kalou - 26 - Nani - 24 - Rooney - 25 - Valencia - 26 - Young - 26

The sentence above is my concern. I do not know from what (web)site it does come from, but come on. To say we have included Ferreira because we do not have cover for Ashley.... And Bertrand is a gardener ? ps : I hope it isn't our official website.

:lolwave: I just can't see anybody offer us more than £5m for him.. By the way, he can go for free as far I'm concerned.

Ah okay. My bad, I thought you were talking about both Lukaku and Bertrand. Though I am disagree on the fact he has to win his place. He is our second LB choice and every few games he has played, he was pretty good. Plus, now we have only one left back and three RB. Who will play at LB if Cole picks up an injury ? Our 32 years-old third choice at RB ?

It's been 8 months he is poor. Wrong ! He is average at best. And I'll repeat myself, we ain't calling for his head "after a relatively short time". It's been months that many of us want him out !

What did he miss ? And is he playing good aside this ?

... I didn't even mentiond stage group or the UCL in general, I just asked about this :

Yeah, plus he doesn't fear to show his ass on the telly. First off, BadBoy has answered for me. Secondly, I didn't asked about the Valencia game, but about the Genk game. And has Badboy said, I'd rather us to change our formation than playing him on the wing.

You are wrong mate. We didn't start to think he is garbage after those two games. We think so for a long time. To sum up, because he has been garbage for five years.

Do you think it will be crucial for us and Kalou that Kalou play against Genk ?