Peace.

He made an assit.

he scored a good goal !

http://www.myp2phd.com/ch2.html This one is good (in French).

http://www.firstrows...s-ogc-nice.html édit : not working very well....

Yeah yeah, my post was being evasive. I was just referencing to the clash AVB Vs Players (I even didn't have in mind the part I have underlined in you post).

The players are said to be against André because they don't appreciate his tactics and/or methods. It is just an excuse for them to get him sacked. Indeed, if you look at the players who are pretty much likely to be part of the group wanting André out, they are either about to be pushed out of the club by André (Kalou, Malouda) or are fringe players in André's project (Lampard). They just react this way because they fear about losing their own comfort.

If he is saying he has the support of Roman, it must be true. I don't think you can tell bullshit about Roman without being punished. So Roman support must be genuine.

This game should be very, very interesting. After all what happened since the Everton game, we will see if there's truly a cleavage in the squad, between André, the players who are backing him, and the dick heads who think they are better than him. I think I'll be more focused on the players' behavior than on the game itself. If we witness some players blatantly showing their disinterest (or should I say, their opposition) toward the manager, we must point them out and start a virulent "[enter the name of the player] out" campaign.

Comes September 2012, he must only be an unpleasant memory.

Welcome, amie transalpin.

I didn't see the match. But according to l'Équipe, he played from the 65th minutes. He seems to have had two or three good moments.

True. But my point was more, if size does matter, then Barça should struggle against everyone, since five of their starters (and key players) are small in size and weight. It is not the case, and despite their small size, they can cope with physical challenge. On the other hand, despite having a team composed of relatively big and tall players, we seem to lose physical battles against anyone.

Dani Alves -> 173 cm Xavi -> 170 cm Iniesta -> 170 cm Alexis Sanchez -> 169 cm Messi -> 169 cm These players mentioned above are not really loosing a lot of battles. If we lose a lots of battles, this is not because of our players' physical capacities and abilities, this is only because of the general apathy running the squad.

What the hell with Piazon ? We have players better than him in the reserve / youth team. It's fortunate for him that he looks like Kaka and not Kalou... Imagine what would be his hypes.

We should stop to comment on the treatment he gave to Anelka and Alex. Nobody knows what did happen. So unless we have somebody in the know here, we are not able to judge whether he is wrong or not.

It could be André, Santa Clause or Elizabeth II, it doesn't make a diference to my eyes. The thing which would bother me, is that old average players who would be the "boss" at the club. If it was Messi, Xavi and Puyol who would lead the front anti-AVB, then I wouldn't mind, since they are exceptional players, but no, this is only Lampard, Malouda and co, i.e. mediocre players. And finally, if it was Abramovich himself who was to sack AVB, without being adviced by the players, I would still keep watching Chelsea.

Go and check ManC's squad. You'll understand why there's no un-rested players.

Yes there's a reason why I will stop watching Chelsea if they win against André. It is merely because Chelsea isn't their toy. If they want to play despite being shit, and having a big fat check at the end of every weeks, they should fuck off to Emirates. I won't watch a team managed by a bunch of old egoistical underperforming players who are pleased with their mediocrity. You say they give so much to this club in the past, true, but since I am not a scouser I am looking toward the future, and all I see them giving to us in the future, is mediocrity.

If those multi-millionaires manage to get André sacked, I'll stop watching Chelsea games as long as they'll be in our club.

When newspapers were suggesting, at the start of the season (around september/October), that there was a problem between André and some players, people didn't want to believe it and were discrediting those newspapers. I even did put forward the possibility of some players not really listening to André's orders on the field (I have suggested that following a journo's comment on this matter), but I was told it was only media's bullshit to destabilise us. It looks now it wasn't untrue.

The journalist : "is this a rumor ?" Hazard : "yes it's a rumor, of course it's a club who is interesting me, there are great players, there's a great coach I think, but I have signed nothing [with no teams], it will happen soon I hope. But for the moment I am focusing on Lille."

I am proud of him, he is trully a Chelsea player.

Despite all the bad things he does and how much he is frustrating, he will do two 'good' things : to give us the possibility to not play once again Malouda on the wing, because his pace, his speed, his crossing and shooting abilities are way too much poor for him to be more than average (Indeed, he - Malouda - should only play in the midfield) ; To have a second option - after Drogba - for not playing the Ladyboy.

Wait man, he is already doing extra shooting practice. HAHAHA.

What the hell, I really cannot see where you come from with this. First off all, David Luiz is still struggling and still mistake prone ? I do not think so. For the past month or so he has been one of our best players (and by far our best player in at least two games), and he didn't did a mistake for a long time, as far as I can recall. To say he is struggling and mistake prone at the moment... MEH. And secondly, I really don't see in what Cahill would have change something if he had been played instead of Luiz since the brazilian did nothing wrong in this game, I really can't.