Peace.

Why Drogba is still on the pitch ?

When Alex will be back, we should play Ivanovic as our striker

It's fucking boring to watch. We know that Drogba is on the pitch only thanks to the team sheet. Anelka plays everywhere but not on the right wing. Ramires is fucking good ! Ancelotti should stop talk and should start to act. And I bet Kalou will replace Ramires at the 60th minutes. => Same ol' same ol'....

http://atdhe.net/32547/watch-chelsea-vs-blackburn

Why Drogba has been sent off ?

http://www.p2plive.net/0115/watch-chelsea-vs-blackburn-rovers-2.html

Ask Killamanjaro 'Cause Anelka has the most shining skull in the Premier League :eyebrows:

If you're lucky Danni, maybe you will play 30 minutes today

I hope for you the reality ain't gonna hurt you : 1 Petr Cech 17 Jose Bosingwa 2 Branislav Ivanovic 26 John Terry © 3 Ashley Cole 7 Ramires 5 Michael Essien 8 Frank Lampard 39 Nicolas Anelka 11 Didier Drogba 15 Florent Malouda

Sturridge on the bench = Carlo is a criminal. By the way, who thought there would have been a bloody youth on the pitch ?! Fuck that !

C'mon guys, this is not because he doesn't cost £20 million and because he doesn't sell as much jersey as CR7 that he isn't a good player. He remains a very good player. And a team doesn't need only world stars to be good. We have lacked of creativity when Lampard was injured and people were complaining about that. Now we can add a player who has a good creativity skill, people say who don't need this type of player...

It's really hard to believe Carlo here... Since this summer he promises us things... Like the involvement of the youth. So I will only believe him once the team sheet is out. For now I think it's just a way to scare Essien (and maybe the other old players). Drop Essien remains a gamble imo. Blackburn is a very rugged team and Josh is really skinny and he is only 17 years-old. First of all, I don't know if he will be able to deal with BlackBurn's physical strenght, and, I imagine he can be injured easily with such beasts... If it was up to me, I would give him a start just against the likes of Black Pool, Wigan etcetera. We can't risk his career. If a 'youth' must start, it's Sturridge no doubt. I think I would have a heart attack if he doesn't start - especially if it's Kalou who start instead of him lol.

Kakuta is going nowhere. He said himself that he will learn more if he stays at Chelsea than if he plays for a smaller team. And according to an 'insider' Kakuta wants to stay at Chelsea.

This eternal argue about Kalou looks more like a showdown between people who hate each others than a debat about a player...

Wenger gonna put him in his bed

God damn ! Why the hell are we always fuck up the good deals ?! It would be a good sign, we don't have this type of player in our squad. We only have one midfielder who has creativity and it's Lampard. So Pienaar would have been a good addition the our team. But once again, we fuck up the good deal and prefer to buy the players who cost £18 million.

Welcome !

I found this on skysports.com : Sigh...

2-1 for Real. Goal from Ronaldo (!)

Yeah, I don't doubt of that. But my point is : we don't have a lot of money to spend. So instead of wasting it to buy a player we don't need right now, we better to use it to buy a player which we need. And if we buy Subotic for £17 million, we couldn't buy someone like Navas because I strongly doubt that we have £47 million to spend through this transfert window.

Nah. What he lacks is just football abilities. Yeah he has a good pace and commitment, but it's all. He has an awful finish, he can't dribble (when he starts to dribble you see immediately he's gonna loose the ball - actually, his problem is that he just looks at the ball while he should look at his opponent, and when he dribbles he seems to not know what to do with the ball, that's why he's a poor dribbler), he isn't constant (one game he can be good but the next game he's awful - so he's not reliable), he has a bad passing game. To me he is the double of his brother Bonaventure Kalou and he will have the same career as him... The only thing who changes is that he's a bit better. Here the sum up fo his career : he played in Eredivisie (at Feyenoord like Salomon), then he has moved to a French top side, Paris SG, and finally, since he has left Paris in august 2007 he has played only 30 games (Lens, Al jazira Abu Dhabi, Heerenveen). And I think Salomon will have the same journey : Feyenoord -> Chelsea -> some obscure club. We gave him enough time to show something. He didn't grab his chance. So now it's time to say Bye Bye Salomon Of course I wouldn't mind to keep him since we have squad deep problems, but he should be here just to give some rest every now and then to our main players.

So we have £17 million to spend ? Then we should to use this cash to buy someone of the like of Jesus Navas, Alexis Sanchez...

That's not a bad idea at all ! But... I wonder if it isn't still too near of the box for him The fact that we only have Lampard to kick decent corners highlight one of our weakness -> we lack of creative players. Every good team has a good (at least) creative player - Barcelona has Xavi and Iniesta; Madrid has Ronaldo and Ozil; Arsenal has Nasri and Fabregas; ManU has Nani; etc... Once again, we come to this conclusion : that's why we have to buy a right winger and/or an attacking midfielder...

And you have forgot Mikel lol. So I think he will be out for three Chelsea weeks, ie three months... I guess our medical staff doesn't use the same calendar as us It seems that Bertrand is back with us, so I hope CA rates him and keeps him to give some needed rest to Ashley Cole...