Mário César

who cares about football?

where you read that?

I think it will be the biggest mistake of mount's career, but let's wait and see.

dybala is not a 9. He's more suited to playing behind the striker, like nkunku. gives us more finishing ability, which is what we need

I don't see the point in having him back if we already have two players on the right defensive wing

dybala's problem is not his quality but the fact that he gets injured too often but the truth is that he would be a very cheap player.

I think it's too little for someone who needs to get back to the top of the table. lautaro had a good season. it's a risky choice, but i prefer him to the other names it will also depend on how much inter asks for him

we only need caicedo and one more midfielder that's three and probably gallegher will stay. the fourth midfielder plays little and without champions league much less. it makes no sense to buy more than two midfielders.

I'm not particularly excited about any striker, but Lautaro seems to be the one with the best track record and coming off a good season. Under normal conditions, I'd want Oshimen but it's a lot of money so it doesn't make sense. With a season without champions league, we can't spend that much money.

I prerfer Lautaro over Vlahovic Oshimen is too expensive 180M its too much

wtf we bring gusto for what really?

the problem is that we need him so much that it's complicated to give up the player

More?????

The problem is that we already have a young squad. there won't be room for everyone

what is the point of spending so much money on young people? buying some is fine, but this has been an exaggeration

its possible to see this interview in video?

where you read that?

we will buy two more midfielders and for a season without champions it seems to me to be enough.

Im the only one who thinks kepa had a mediocre season and doesn't understand how the club doesn't want another goalkeeper?

link?

this year we will have less games and we have two youngsters with a lot of potential, besides cucurella. even if cucurella leaves, it doesn't make sense to spend money on a player for the bench. there are much higher priority positions than a LWB.

LOOOOL

I even think that arsenal will become weaker if they sell partey xhaka and partey had great seasons last year and i don't think rice will be able to keep up the level, as well as havertz will be a failure about mount, i think he is being very overrated, for a player that comes from a mediocre season and the season that he was really good was in Tuchel's and even then i don't know if it will be enough for united to be satisfied with the purchase

I was reading the article that matt law wrote about mount and there are two points that I would like to talk about. a) he compares cole's renewal situation with mount's, in that it is not always right to lower the wage structure, since the best players demand high salaries the point is that ashley cole, in 2006, was much more of a player than mount will ever be. He already had a very strong history with Arsenal, he had even won two leagues, being part of that epic 2004 team. Cole was world class, Mount is not at that level. In relation to it being necessary to have a high salary mass because it attracts the best players, once again, it's subjective, and the perfect example of this is United, which pays very high salaries to mediocre players and keeps them at the club and can't sell them because it's an obstacle, paying too much for what the players produced and deserve.