eldo

Wilshere is much more mature than Josh and is further with his development. Agger, Johnson, Gerrard, Kelly are all injured.

I'm not familiar with they injuries. I agree that those three aren't the best players. But they have a very effective team. They can switch from their usual 4-4-2 to 4-5-1 and 4-3-3, because they have at least some good options. We replaced 4-3-3 with 4-42 and we were poor again.

Hasn't Gourlay said that Drogba is going to stay?

You are talking like he has a magic wand. If I remember corectly he played Malouda and Zhirkov in that 3 man midfield. We were using 4-4-2 now and it was as bad as before. How could he control injuries of Lampard, Yossi and Yury? Who does he have in midfield? Ozil and Kaka on the bench?

In fact we have a huge gap between our youth and senior players. So we need couple of 24yos. Surely some of our young players deserve their chances but not all of them.

He never even played a single match in CL. And he won Copa Libertadores twice.

Why we don't need him? Can you explain since you are from Russia and you probably know more about him than I do.

I won't call you a plastic fan because you have the right to say what you think. I just don't understand why is everyone taling about letting players go. If we learned anything from this season than it is that we need to add them. We should let some of them go, but not 9 like most of the people here write on their lists. 3-4 out and 2-4 in is much more reasonable.

"Josh signed a professional contract on July 1st 2010 which will take him through to the end of the 2012-13 season." Oh yes now I remember. He signed it last summer when he become a pro. Your guy is wrong.

Yes he lost his starting position but we shouldn't get rid of him.

Andre Villas Boas. Very capable young coach. He won Portuguese title in his second season as a manager. His team plays nice football.

Lampard? Are you fucking joking?

And of course Clifford should get his debut.

Come on rather say something about Dzagoev than blame Carlo.

Anelka really didn't have that energy to run the game for the whole 90 minutes.

If you have a good starting team you don't need to influence the game week in week out. I'm not naive I know what it means to influence a game with your sub. But every fucking game they want him to influence the game. That alone is an indicator that something is wrong with your first 11.

So you want to say that a self-made billionare is stupid?

I doubt it too. All of our staff rate him highly. And I think that he wouldn't do that. Lack of first team football? He got enough of it.

I agree. It really was coming.

He should be our top prority.

Giggs gets a lot of rest and then has his good cameos.

So you put the priority of sacking Carlo befor addiong some young capable players. Says all about you.

Just read how Kostas said that Carlo never influences the game with his subs. And I also noticed that in the last few months many members here said the sam things every week. So since when do you need to change your game with your subs every round?

You can stop with irony now. Accept this defeat and move on.

He lived up to those expectations until now, sadly his time is coming. Agree.