

IMissEden
MemberEverything posted by IMissEden
-
Based on a snipped out of context clip from Kamala HQ? Do you like to work with honesty or not
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
As touched on, one is geared to post like, talk like, and manipulate, teenagers.
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Kamala twitter posts all have the emotional triggers and tone of teenagers. Because they’re not appealing to sensible people. Every time her fingers move or mouth opens it’s designed to manipulate vulnerable people, which most people are. You don’t understand you’re a sheep to a shepherd who sees you as a number that verifies they’ve done the job for the shadow state. You need to simply get a grip and smell the coffee at this pt if thinking this is policies vs policies or personality vs personality. 0 idea what’s going on if not disturbed by goings ons outwith what parrot from other parrots.
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
It should concern whoever reads this that you never know what Trump will say next — they’re actually his decisions to say — and yet we always know Kamala’s isms — to a T, she follows xyz, every time —- unable to express a single sentence that sounds actually like a normal person. Who do you think has a shadow state behind them vs not. Why in the living Christ would you vote for more shadow state. To keep weaving the countless societal changes that they do, for their own gains, at a cost to others sanity, congruency, and normality. It remains: in this election, you are siding toward either more dishonest designing of society toward ideals that crack, or, you are siding with reality. Both use hyperbole, so don’t ascribe one side as dishonest, so dishonestly, ignoring owns chronic proclivity toward tarring others with lack of nuance but instead damning labels to shut them up. It is obvious the wolves in sheep clothing are that. The other side are just relatively simple people who don’t want to keep up these cycles of lunacy from social media to real life, all always tied to exaggerated to unfounded claims.
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Most people pining for Trump are centrists, not RW. People who are always open to all the facts, and probabilities, committed to 0 party, have decided to vote for trump. Obviously. The writing is on the wall re all the absolutely idealistic, destructive “norms” democrats want to manufacture, as well as export. This is not trump vs Biden x Kamala x whoever is the next pretend democrat leader being fed everything from an ear piece. This is, reality vs insanity. You disregard one single man’s hyperbolic mockery of others - some of it right on the money - for the greater good. Is seeing the forest for the trees, or seeing beyond the trees. Most just look at what’s directly in front of them. Times are alarming. If no democratic dishonesty, trump will obviously win, because what’s being represented actually matters far more to global stability, and local wellbeing, vs any type of future that follows Kamala and co doing their puppet job for others. You need to understand the reality of the shadow state, and that that’s what’s being fought against by Trump, Musk, and their few. They’re happy to be sacrificial lambs and be called everything under the sun without faking smiles, faking laughs, and engineering the people to follow them out of design, not merit. One side manipulates as a wolf in sheeps clothing. The other is a straight shooter, so often seen as stupid, in this modern nuanced overly connected (too many stupid people with opinions) time. You’re either with being lied to, or not. You’re either with giving over reigns of the globe to a single team, or not. It is almost like Stockholm syndrome. You can’t fathom the extent and how long ago it started, being groomed toward ideology. That’s how most votes are won. It’s obvious when people are brainwashed to be a way vs neutral and from neutrality, balanced in assessments. This latter crowd are more compelled than ever to support whoever is against the charades, that hurt school children, hurt communities, dissolve identities and so on.
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I hope we can enjoy having the best player in the world, without Contrarians wanting to Pump The Breaks out of caution, without at all evaluating a thing. “One of the best players in the Premier League on current form” type senile statements on social media. Is a shame so many are raised to parrot Well Wait A Minute over things they don’t understand. It’s like they can’t fathom others are concluding something before themselves, so peddle a meta frame of, Let’s Not Get Ahead Of Ourselves Guys. The people who comment on football for a living while never getting anything right 😆😆😆 Very very very enjoyable times just based on Palmer. It is what it is. It’s tryhard to pigeonhole a Bayern or Madrid one trick pony into the spot. Eden was best in league. Messi was still around, and others still had exceptional form. I think this is the first time we’ve had the best player in the world unless we appreciate say Terry or Makelele in the same way lol.
-
+ with an intelligent winger we’d be doing better than 1-1, things like that need understood when Madueke handicaps the side all game to turn out 1 goal which is not good enough for top sides whatsoever
-
For as bad as his form is, Enzo is the same age as Jackson. Jackson gets, “he’s developing” credit, for what looks like will be 3 seasons. Not once has anyone considered, Enzo also needs Development. Tailored to him. Will get it and thrive if he goes elsewhere which I do want now if neither party can fix it here.
-
Good input Milan, if you can counter a point do it so that people have your better quality insight or experience to work with. Let’s go. On here for 18 years and think that’s conducive. On here 18 years and can’t tell up from down about this; if that post triggers you to act 18 which you’re obviously not. So what’s funny, or inaccurate. Do you often laugh at facts you think you know better about.
-
Sesko is just another system player designed for where he currently is ignore it
-
This is a testament to Mentality. If every player had alike focus, ambition, yet lack of ego —- true obsession with playing the game how it should be played — you get a super team. It’s how Guardiola designed both Barcelona and City — no writers have unpacked it yet. Simply knowing Mentalities, and their peaks and twists. Aligning players that have harmonious qualities Inside, not outside. This is why I find it impossible to like, rate, see a great successful dominant future with Jackson, and more than a few others still. Mental midgets and ego lords in droves Exact repeat of Hazard having to play with B tier most his time here. Doesn’t have to be that lower frustrating path. Understand trajectory of qualities, start cutting losses and further honing recruitment model / policy.
-
He’s easily the best player in the world. It takes a smartass to overthink it.
-
If you put the new ownership model that precludes dark times, ahead of what actually benefits the club, then yes
-
Players don’t progress though in the way that football culture mythologises. What you see is what you get in 9 out of 10 cases. The majority of players do not improve much over time once in their rhythms of senior football. Formative years matter. You can see traits in xyz players that are them, tied to ego or muscle memory, too long ingrained. Shocked we went for him, shocked anyone rated him. But as it goes with purple patches of form, in hyping things up, for everyone who misses the damning nuances that preclude how the trajectory will go. Is not rocket science - is football. Who shoots to the skies and doesn’t is more obvious than what’s for dinner later XI should be 8/10 players every game. Madueke will hit plenty of 4/10 performances ahead, just like Jackson and Caicedo will until they’re 30. I don’t rate it. I’m not buying in to crumbling standards and butchered abilities to assess players in these modern social media times. All 3 are absolute guarantees of inability to compete at the top level year in year out all honours. Sanchez. Obviously. Why on earth do people flip flop so much. Any flip flopping is proof a player isn’t it.
-
You want a stable manager when you Know not speculate that they’re exceptional at their job, an outlier. Need to not even consider managerial stability until that exact station is better tuned. Maresca flaws have persisted for years now, not months. They haven’t improved despite better players at disposal. He exudes under-coach in every orifice to me. Cannot picture trophy hauls at all. Competing for one every 5 years eventually I can see, and some FA cups. Not the level accustomed to / enjoy.
-
Let’s discuss what Sanchez has been doing every week or 2 without fail for years as if it’s new, and discuss it like oh that’s a surprise, hopefully he will Improve. Christ. This fanbase and the allergy to identifying and cutting losses timely, always wasting the best players we have by keeping absolute Ass around them year after year despite being actual jokes. The conversations around such obviousness being, but maybe, maybe it’ll magically turn from a dog poo into a wedding cake! Any day now! Christ
-
He’s also not in the squad because he’s an erratic shit who takes too long to make every decision, barely different to the revised iconography of Loftus Cheek. Play half a mile slower in their minds than should. Is like every other player is elegant and then comes along a taxi with one wheel missing. And people compliment it.
-
This is who Sanchez always was and is. Thinking he was redeemable is an indictment on anyone. No understanding how players work. Worst player I’ve ever seen.
-
Has the football iq of Raul meireles at best
-
I wonder if “I just coach the players” Maresca or the scouts or the directors, they’re certainly the same corner of a square, went for Dewsbury. It doesn’t make sense from a policy, structural perspective. Who actually called for, who green lit.
-
anyone with one half eye could tell you Gyokeres was a beast, a definition of a true cemented beast, nothing to speculate. There is 0 compliments due toward anyone for knowing Gyokeres is elite. Duran has the same exact question marks and same exact qualities as prior. We have Felix who doesn’t suit, Nkunku who doesn’t fit, Tosin in with better quality out, let’s not do this revisionism crap based on crumb perspectives. They’re awful. You don’t make this many mistakes as a top team.
-
Is this because of West Ham who showed out the worst performance of any top 5 leagues this season. Is not the bar to measure with. Other contexts are. In which he remains a liability. Cannot be a top player while also being erratic. His up and down performances which are that, will stay that, because deeper, he plays like he’s anxious, always - presumably comes in hyped up or nervous or whichever predisposition taken that fuels erratic play. He is still a joke. A broken clock gets it right two times a day type thing. He has plenty errors ahead. Top players may have a couple errors ahead. This won’t fix, because it’s how he plays. Unlike top players. Would be torrid and so shit in any top side today that has true balance. Madrid or City, would be sat on the bench fast. Have to zoom out from a context of in this moment as a mid table team when compared to Enzo’s current form. That’s not how we measure players at all. Or it is, how most measure players, hence constant YoYo opinions based on form. Should all make assessments if can, and stick to. The fundamentals are obvious in each player, their good and their bad. It’s also obvious which fundamentals are crucial in impeding or watering a top side. I hate to my core that we are tied to playing this level because of the figure he cost.
-
I’m glad he finally resembles a £20m player, we have improved from the £6m dodgy raw youngster, now we are serviceable mid
-
Saw this in post previews and thought this was about democrat party
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Like people with immigration concerns are called racist. Quite stupid isn’t it
- 15,923 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: