Vesper

OMG VAR is going to chalk it off

1 1 and SHOULD be 2 1

it is fucking rigged PGMOL and the FA KNOW Scott is a manure enabling twat with a dodgy history

Peter Walton said VAR stood down and refused to get involved as it was a judgement call by that CUNT Graham Scott the last time Scott was the ref of a Manure game was their 2-1 win over West Ham United last season, where he awarded two very controversial penalty kicks, which were both converted by Paul Pogba.

Rio Ferdinand and Robbie Savage on BT Sport both believe that Victor Lindelof should have penalised for a foul on Wilfried Zaha in the box.

stone cold pen on Lindelöf his 26th birthday present came 4 hours early this league is SO rigged

OGS surely is aware of the GD gap with Leicester, I can see them pushing on for 2 or 3 more goals

is 82 but still healthy Lampard should hire him as a defensive consigliere (even if via remote conference) like Phil Jackson did with Tex Winter (who retired at 86yo) on his 11 Jordan Bulls and LA Lakers basketball championship teams Winter was his triangle offence guru

might have been a pen, PGMOL working their pro manure agenda

Otto Rehhagel used a libero-based semi catenaccio system to take Greece to the trophy in 2004 Traianos Dellas was their 6 foot 5 libero/sweeper King Otto

Italian catenaccio In the 1950s, Nereo Rocco's Padova pioneered catenaccio in Italy where it would be used again by other Italian teams throughout the 1960s; his strategy was initially also known as the mezzosistema, as, like the vianema, it modified elements of the sistema.[12][18][19] Rocco's tactic, often referred to as the real Catenaccio, was shown first in 1947 with Triestina: the most common mode of operation was a 1–3–3–3 formation with a strictly defensive team approach, while his team would look to score by starting quick counter-attacks with long balls after winning back possession. With catenaccio, Triestina finished the Serie A tournament in a surprising second place. Some variations include 1–4–4–1 and 1–4–3–2 formations. He later had great success with Milan using the catenaccio system during the 60s and 70s, winning several titles, including two Serie A titles, three Coppa Italia titles, two European Cups, two European Cup Winners' Cups, and an Intercontinental Cup.[20][21][22][23][24] Alfredo Foni also used the catenaccio tactic successfully with Inter during the 1950s; unlike Rocco, however, the teams's strong defensive play off the ball did not limit the offensive manner in which his team played while in possession of the ball.[12] In his system, his team's right winger, Gino Armano, would drop back to mark the opposing the team's left winger (essentially acting as a tornante, allowing Ivano Blason, the right-back, to shift across and act as a sweeper and clear balls away. Blason also played as a sweeper under Rocco; as such, he is often considered to be the first true sweeper in Italian football.[5][11] The key innovation of Catenaccio was the introduction of the role of a libero ("free") defender, also called "sweeper", who was positioned behind a line of three defenders. The sweeper's role was to recover loose balls, nullify the opponent's striker and double-mark when necessary. Another important innovation was the counter-attack, mainly based on long passes from the defence.[12][25] In Helenio Herrera's version of catenaccio in the 1960s, he used a 5–3–2 formation, in which four man-marking defenders were tightly assigned to the opposing attackers while an extra player, the sweeper, would pick up any loose ball that escaped the coverage of the defenders. The emphasis of this system in Italian football spawned the rise of many top Italian defenders who became known for their hard-tackling and ruthless defending. However, despite the defensive connotations, Herrera claimed shortly before his death that the system was more attacking than people remembered, saying 'the problem is that most of the people who copied me copied me wrongly. They forgot to include the attacking principles that my Catenaccio included. I had Picchi as a sweeper, yes, but I also had Facchetti, the first full back to score as many goals as a forward.' Indeed, although his Grande Inter side were known primarily for their defensive strength, they were equally renowned for their ability to score goals with few touches from fast, sudden counter-attacks, due to Herrera's innovative use of attacking, overlapping full-backs. Under Herrera, Inter enjoyed a highly successful spell, which saw them win three Serie A titles, two European Cups, and two Intercontinental Cups.[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]

who knows, maybe maybe if they score first and go flat back 9, lololol or Catenaccio, 1950's, 60's Italian style lock box

I sorta like it, lolol

IF we beat Wolves (assuming we lose to Liverpool), the ONLY way we can not go to the CL is if Leicester and Manure win the 3 games they have left, and then DRAW against each other then they both go over us on GD

just so it is not all completely doom even if lose to the dippers but beat Wolves if Leicester lose to Spuds they cannot catch us the same for Manure if they lose one of their 3 games (probably will be Leicester if they are to lose, and Leicester will have Chilwell and Maddison back for that game) finally, IF we beat wolves and if Manure win the next 2, by small amounts and Leicester beat them Leicester probably (even if they lose to Spuds in a close game, no more than a 2 goal loss) knocks Manure out of the CL on GD as they up 5 now, lets say they lose to spuds by 2, manure win their next two by a total of plus 4 (we will know much more after this Palace game), then Manure goes into the final game +1, so if Leicester win, even by one goal, they go over Manure on GD

Premier League | Crystal Palace vs Manchester United http://www.sportnews.to/sports/2020/premier-league-crystal-palace-vs-manchester-united-s1/ https://www.totalsportek.com/manchester-united-football/

yes 11 games we either blew wins or blew draws, most late, and 5 at home disasterclass game management by Lamps and the lads

shit performance by SU

and they do not want anything other than a win on the day they get the trophy after the game

yes, I have saying this (and other combos where that would have held or still could hold true too) for a week plus

a draw and win in the next two guarantees us CL, Wolves crashing out assured that SU is now out of the CL as well

absolutely need a Spuds win now, as a draw leaves them (more than likely) on the same points with us (unless we pull points from the dippers) a Leicester win versus Spuds and we are in deep need of help as even if we beat wolves we end on 66 and a draw would give them 66 and through on GD Manure the exact same, they could go in on 65 and a draw puts them through over us on GD as well skulduggery possibly ahead still we desperately need to yank a point (3 would be a dream, a great and wondrous dream) from the dippers, so a win v wolves guarantees us CL as it is impossible for both Leicester and Manure to hit 67 or more

they are spent, ultra small squad and just too many games in a row they are a pressing high energy team, so games take it hard out of them

we are in big trouble

much better from SU