Jump to content

tiby2979

Member
  • Posts

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic Of

Everything posted by tiby2979

  1. The fact that Mourinho has chosen Courtois does not mean that he wanted Cech to leave. From the club's point of view would have been better to keep them both. Cech saved us several times this season, Mou said it: "we are fortunate to have two of the best goalkeepers in the world". But for the sake of Cech have decided let it go rather than force him to fulfill his contract. With this move the club has lost a top goalkeeper and also reinforced a direct rival. If was not a legend, the club probably would not have agreed to this.
  2. Where do you get this? The club wanted him to stay, he's the one who wants to leave. Mourinho said it several times.
  3. ¿This is seriously? play there some of the top players in the world and among its teams accumulate nine World Cups.
  4. WTF? rival fan infiltrated here?
  5. It's a message of loyalty to Mourinho.. "Loyalty has a calm heart and is unquestionable. Stomp wherever fled the traitors."
  6. This is nothing. Marca published last year that Jose had said that he would destroy the career of Courtois if he played against us in the matches vs AM.
  7. I remember a statement he gave in october to Sky saying that move to City was not his decision. In january, after the media uncovered the lies behind his "loan" had no choice but to accept that had indeed been his choice.
  8. What happened here? I missed something?
  9. I would not be surprised if he ends up making a Vieira. I see it coming. After all, they will still be their employers for the next 2-3 years and as things turned out in the end, he probably will have in the future a closer relationship with City than to Chelsea.
  10. Who cares? nothing should care us less if he is known to the rest of his life as a City legend. He loses, not us. Let City have his false legend. We have other legends of which to be proud.
  11. You have hit the mark. It is easy to forget what he did because unfortunately for him, there were no consequences. He failed to help the City to win the title, but if anyone has any doubt that he wanted it more than anything and that if successful would have been the happiest in the world at the cost of our failure is that is fooling himself.
  12. When i had said that he should be content to just sit on the bench? if he moves to Arsenal or United I will not have problems with that. But it is just not true that we're the ones who want to get rid of him.
  13. I said him goodbye three years ago and knew he probably would not continue after this season, but still i could not help but mourn a bit when i knew. My favorite chelsea player ever.
  14. No, because unlike Lampard, Cech did not mock the fans neither lied cowardly to protect his image
  15. You have seen very little football really.
  16. We are NOT getting rid of him. It is he who wants to leave.
  17. I don't feel obviously safer with Courtois in the goal than with Cech...
  18. ¿Guillem Balague works in Jose's staff? he was the first to release the news. Besides he says that Madrid has also contacted with other coaches, not only with Jose.
  19. Perhaps because the way his PL career is coming to an end it has not been the most appropriate. Even for the neutral people, his image has gotten a bit damaged, most of all for the scandal that there was in January for the lies about the "loan".
  20. Lampard did not announce that he was leaving Chelsea until finishing up the season. Now Gerrard will leave the english football as Liverpool Legend, while Lampard will make it as City Player.
  21. He knew this would happen, and he did not care. City wanted buy a legend and got it.
×
×
  • Create New...