tiby2979

I hope that he fails there. I have nothing personal against he but I am a Chelsea fan and I ain't Belgian and he would be a player of a rival club ;-)

You are very naive if you believe that Lampard sulked for the club and no for individual reasons.

In Chelsea he had disagreements with Roman about the squad management (he didn't want Shevchenko) and in Madrid lost the locker room for having dropped Casillas.

Eva has become a celebrity for the simple fact of being woman. And this, in itself, already is sexist and pretty sad. In an ideal world she would go as by unnoticed as the rest of her male colleagues.

LMAO Guardiola scolded and caused the exit of medical staff of Dr Muller-Wohlfahrt that had worked thirty years in Bayer

https://twitter.com/WeAreChelseaFC/status/628164904546140160

FFS this is so embarrassing

You don't understand, He really isn't Chelsea fan, He said it.

You're not Chelsea fans ¿why you comment on this forum?

DM and its delusive headlines

Yes.

Chelsea win the CL would not be so farfetched. Arsenal win the league undefeated ... pfff Lampard hadn't even signed a formal contract with NYCFC, from the legal viewpoint he still wasn't NYCFC player, therefore, they could not loan him. The decision of join to City was of Lampard and of nobody else.

I see no hypocrisy in this. The reason why Mourinho is opposed to this is because Cech is a goalkeeper WC, not because he is a Chelsea legend. From his point of view, looks like a bad move the club's decision to strengthen a direct rival, this has nothing to do with loyalty or feelings.

¿..? According to reports, the reason that F. Perez is ready to let go Ramos is because he is asking for a raise 10M to renew and the club not want to give him.

I have been on the Bridge more times than you've fucked, xenophobic clown. And no, there should be cheered every time he play against us, only the first time. End off.

Do not you know how to read? Or You suffer some sort of deficiency reading comprehension? Or have you deliberately misrepresented my words? Did I say that he should be booed? No, I said that he should be cheered only the first time he returns to Bridge. Not each time he return. I not think it is so difficult to understand.

Some fans in their desperation to show class just clowning around.I repeat it. The FIRST TIME he returns to Bridge it's fine. After no. End off.

Giving a tribute to a legend that move to a rival the first time back home is fine, but cheer him each time return is ridiculous, shameful and disrespectful to our club and our players.

I did not want to say, but ... this.

Forget it. If supposedly he refused an offer of 150K-a-week from PSG, it´s that he does not have any intentions of going to a foreign club.

As i look at it, the essence of loyalty in football is the of fans to their clubs. That is the true loyalty, that is untied. ¿To ensure the loyalty of their legends, the club has that to retain them until they want to retire and keep them in the XI although have better players than them? ¿How can say that a player is loyal to a club if this loyalty is conditioned by a contract and a place in the XI and titles and good money? ¿is this loyalty? no, this is convenience. If we had ten years without winning a title as Arsenal our best players would want leave although the club would want to retain them. I have no problem with a player moving to a rival club, not really affect me that Cech will go to Arsenal, at least he was honest and never pretended loyalty to our club. My problem is with those players who claim to love their clubs and encourage an image of loyal legend and what they really loves is the titles and the money they earn. This is also being hypocritical. IMO, the club owes nothing to these legends. For starters, if it had not been for the investment of Abramovich, Cech and Drogba never would have come here and Lampard and Terry would have left us in the prime of their careers. They have done great things for the club but have not done for love/loyalty but rather for money/titles, and all those things have gained in abundance, they have been amply rewarded for their services and they have benefited from the club so much as the club from them.

¿It is true the report of he rejected an offer of 150K-a-week from PSG?

It is the same comparison that I put but more detailed. ^^And no, the company is not forcing me to nothing because the decision is mine. Therefore, I take responsibility. Have never liked me taking a victimization attitude nor i like to feel that i am a victim of circumstances. It reminds me of those people who hates his job but not leave because not get another and lives complaining that feels like a slave. These people are free to leave their job and if they don't, for whatever reason, is his decision. Similarly, the people who complain that they have missed work when actually had the option to stay but under less favorable conditions.

I work in a company and my boss decide assign my tasks to someone else but tells me he wants me to stay, and still i want to go and find another job. The decision it is mine, not of my boss. If i say that my boss to throw me out when expressly told me he wanted me to stay, from my point of view, i'd be lying. This is my opinion and also applies in the case of Cech.

And i agree with this. I think you have not understood anything i said. At no time have I hinted that the club should have forcing Cech to fulfill his contract. They did the right thing let it go. What I'm trying to say is that it is unfair to say that the club decided to throw him out because it is not true. They would have been happy if Cech would have decided to stay.