cosmicway

Fair enough. We don't seem to have a problem against smaller teams - except if something really outrageous happens, like Swansea. It's the same situation as under Mourinho really, minus the very bad psychology in his last days. I think we can go for a Europa league position or a cl position but no higher. The present squad has the known limitations.

Roman has to jump into action and it's not something like bailing out the club, it's his job. If it is a lossy investment then it means we are headed towards the ... Isthmian league and everyone resigns. If Chelsea football club is a lossy investment then I wonder how many teams are left in the world.

Matched betting is to make use of two different markets or more to make money irrespective of the outcome of a match / other sports event / other event. Sometimes the markets are in disparity so you can actually do this. For instance one bookie says "Hillary for president = 1.50" and another one says "Trump for president = 8.00" then you profit by backing both sides ! The bookie who says 1.50 for Hillary Clinton will give about 2.60 for Donald Trump. More than 3.00 he cannot possibly give. The bookie who says 8.00 for Donald Trump, will give about 1.08 for Hillary Clinton. More than 1.14 he cannot possibly give ! But because the two are in disparity, you can take advantage by dividing your total bet proportionally. In this particular bet it won't possibly happen. They all know all the details of the US presidential race and a disparity won't happen. It happens in less important events. I remember having seen a huge one for a match between some lesser known Asian football teams. There are snags: 1st) They may "correct" it before you are done placing your bets. Thus the one with "Trump" at 8.00 by the time you strike the bet may say "ooops, it's 2.70 now". 2nd) Are both companies invlolved licensed in your jurisdiction so you are allowed to place bets ? 3d) Betting tax issues. 4th) Are both companies reputable ? There exist some companies with bad reputation. In 2004 there was one who actually carried out a big advertising campaign in the web as well so they attracted customers. In the euro matches that year, I remember many Greeks backed the national team who actually won it in the end. They did n't get paid, late in the year the said company shut shop and goodbye ! Those years I used Eurobet and Betfair who were trusted companies, but some fell for the scam company. The big problem now is what happens if you actually start using the method. Everybody here says that if your bookie catches a whiff that you are into "arbitrage betting" your account is closed ! I don't know why they do that or what problem is it of theirs. If the other company offer different prices then so be it. What is their problem ?? But everybody say they cancel you. I am not an arbitrage bettor so I 'd like to see what the guys who started this service have to say about it.

Mourinho lost 3 to 1 to Liverpool. Conte lost by 2 to 1. Look I never wanted to join the anti-Iva campaign. The man was our no 2 player in the Didier days. Maybe Lamps was our no 2 and Iva the no 3 but as Lamps faded, Iva became the no 2. Now is time for America, to teach the kids. Let's face it, a time comes. Cahill now never really made it, to gain any sort of recognition and Luiz as a defender always carried a question mark with him. I just think you need the tool to finish the job.

After the championship the team aged.

For their second goal the commentator said "look this is pathetic, Chelsea defense line is lost at sea, four forwards are making the defense line and they all fall asleep".

This is like the relegation year. I remember in the stadium program-booklet they were saying "folks there is no money for the water bill - we have to endure". That year Tommy Langley emerged from the youth squad, a great talent but the injury put an end to his career. I think back then everyone understood the situation. But now ?

And what a complicated pass it was ! Next thing to say is "if Ivanovic knows which he should that Cahill is not a footballer he should have packed the ball and take it home".

I 've seen some aging cb's commiting horrible mistakes but three own goals in three consecutive matches is a world's first.

Neasden FC - Sid and Doris Bonkers.

Oh Cahill !

Extraordinary comeback. Please someone explain me why we were the favourites in today's match. I find it strange. They were without Vardy-Mahrez, we started without Diego-Eden. The starting prices were 4.00-4.00-1.90. When it was 2-2 it was 3.00 for Chelsea goal, 7.50 for Leicester goal. But Leicester -with ten men- missed two point blancs (one save by Begovitch, then a clear header just wide). P.S. the "we know you're not here for the ads" keeps coming up, although I disabled APB for the forum ages ago

only 1.53 for a fifth goal

going away in the end

Caesc makes it 3-2. If Cahill found his eyeglasses it's over. Leicester down to ten men after Casius Clay punch on Costa.

thank heavens. it's going to end 3-2 now.

at least they 're not finding our net

lost at sea

I think he needs glasses.

Cahill brought his sleeping bag with him again.

Costa-Hazard subs for Chelsea ! Alonso is playing.

Vardy-Mahrez out from what I see.

It's on betandwatch at the bookies. It's free at the bookies rather, you don't even heve to bet. But how come we are the favourites ? It's a derby match.

How come we are the favourites for this match ? Are Leicester fielding a depleted squad ? It's 4.00-4.00-1.90 now and surely it's more difficult than Everton last year.

Juve went down by what was practically a silly own goal tonight.