

MrExcalibur100
MemberEverything posted by MrExcalibur100
-
This has less to do with the players and more to do with Mourinho's shit-house defensive tactics. That's the most important factor in the equation.
-
Luckily it's not Real Madrid. Could have been bloody. Hazard and Cesc defending for their lives for 90 against Bale and Kroos. Ronaldo bumming us and scoring a hattrick. What's most frustrating is that we're a much better side than this. Mourinho is just so much of a coward and to scared to lose.
-
Let me just type my piece. I know some posters will accuse me of being anti-Mourinho but then again, I could care less. The way we're playing against Liverpool is all Mourinho. It's not Iva or Cahill. The unforced errors and misplaced passes is as a result of the negative tactics. Same thing at City. Even Cesc was misplacing them too. Even if we lost this game, say 2-1 and at least came out to play FOOTBALL, I won't be typing this now. First and foremost, what some seem NOT to realize is that Mourinho is the one responsible for setting this team up offensively and defensively. In the latter, he's great, phenomenal even. His ability to organize a defense was almost revolutionary in English football in his first spell here. Let's remember in his first season here, we only conceded 15 goals in the league. First and foremost above anything else, he's a defensive minded manager. There's nothing wrong with that, but it seems a contradiction to the current group of players at his disposal. In the former however, he's a one trick pony. That's what many people don't get and that's why I feel this group of players don't match his management style at all. Mourinho just doesn't know how to set up his sides to play decent, possession based football. We just press and hope for the best. When the press doesn't work, we retreat to our shell and play "counter-attacking" football. Except it isn't actually that, it's the football of cowards. And when defend and hope for the best doesn't work, we invariably lose or if we're lucky, draw. The only time we come out to play and express ourselves on the pitch is against mediocre sides and even that is once in a blue moon. That's the pattern I've seen in his second spell here, especially in the so-called "bigger" games and it worries me greatly. I hoped and prayed that Mourinho would have become more sophisticated with his tactical approach 2nd time around but it's the same shit over again. It's the worst football of any Chelsea manager I've ever seen in my life with the players at his disposal, both on the pitch and on the bench. We might win the league, but we won't win the Champions league. Once we face a Barca or a Real especially, we'll get killed. We don't have the same defensive minded team that we had a few years ago and I can't imagine Cahill and a 34 year old Terry being able to defend for 180 mins vs the best attacking players in the world.
-
Deserved!!!
-
The only reason he has problems is because we can't even get out of our own half. He has to run many yards just to come out and there are no passing outlets except Costa. Blame Mourinho.
-
Only one team has come to play football and it's not us. Embarrasing to watch and I feel for the fans who traveled north to watch this boring, defensive crap. Mourinho should be ashamed of himself. Might as well have played Zouma and Ramires and left Hazard and Fabregas on the bench if we came to play Rugby.
-
WTF is Ivanovic doing??
-
Absolutely shocking the way we're given the ball away and trying to rush everything. We're looking terrible so far.
-
I missed the game and I just watched the replay now. How Willian didn't score those chances he had, I will never know.
-
So many drama queens here.
-
Blocked. Copyright.
-
So are we going to respond by signing anybody or are we going to continue to baby sit the likes of Schurrle and Salah?
-
A truly terrible performance that was just good enough to beat an injury ravaged, managerless team like Newcastle. That first half performance was befitting of a relegation contender and not a championship contender. Second half was meh, and boring and we still couldn't control the game. I'm just looking at this team and I fear we might just have run out of steam and ideas. Costa, Fabregas and Hazard are the only genuine quality in that attack. It's not good enough. Remy can do a job too, but I fear we will fall short to Man City again because of the lack of quality of some players and our average attacking & possession football. They just have better players than us and that will be fully cemented when they sign Bony. They also always seem so in control of games because of their quality in possession and they create chances at will. We're 2 points clear now, but we should be more. City haven't got out of 3rd gear all season. At this stage, I give them the advantage in the title race. We have a favourable 2nd half, playing the better teams at The Bridge, that's what I hold on to the most now. I hope I'm wrong, but admit it, we've had so many halves like that first half today. The question is why? What was that about? Anyway, 3 points is 3 points. Let me go follow the chess in Netherlands.
-
Very very unconvincing despite the goal and assist papering over the cracks. I literally couldn't believe how poor his all round play was. Oscar has rode on the coattails of Fabregas and Fabregas held his hand, but that mini partnership is now non-existent. He's back to last season mediocrity now. He lacks so many things and I've even noticed some selfishness in his play. Just like Willian and Schurrle, I can't trust him anymore. Not a dependable player for me.
-
And the Judas comes on for Man City
-
Sick play from Costa there.
-
Oscar, Willian and Schurrle are never good enough for Chelsea. Never good enough. They'll cost us this season again.
-
We had a week to practice this game. What exactly were we doing in training?
-
Maybe Luis will give the team more balance now. But one man can't just magically turn around this shower of shit.
-
Of course he has. When our best player is free, you'll think the likes of Oscar and Willian will actually pass the ball instead of trying to play hero ball, but apparently not.
-
If we don't win the league, it's because we have a couple of players who aren't good enough and Man City have better players. It's that simple. Once they add Bony to what they already have, we could be fucked.
-
MSM reporting the gunmen have been killed. Unfortunately, not all hostages made it out alive. Anyway, well done, France! The French tend not to mess around in situations like this, unlike the horribly spineless government in the UK.
- 16,017 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
(a) About "distortions", this has to be the biggest myth about Islamic terrorism. No distortions have taken place. What you see from a group like ISIS for example is the real Islam practiced by Muhammad and his early Muslim followers. The killings, sex slaves, tyranny and oppression of religious minorities. The way of life of Muhammad and his early followers is the FOUNDATION of Sharia Law. (i) READ the biography of Muhammad. Buy it here if you have to: http://www.amazon.com/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420824254&sr=8-1&keywords=biography+of+muhammad+ishaq (ii) READ the Sahih Hadith, Muslim and Bukhari FREE online. http://sunnah.com/bukhari (iii) READ the Tafsir (commentary) of the Qur'an to get the full context on some of it's violent and bigoted passages from the greatest Muslim scholars (Ibn Kathir) FREE. He says FIGHT the JEWS AND CHRISTIANS because they are IDOLATERS in his commentary of Qur'an 9:29. These are Muslims who have studied Islam through and through and know what they're talking about, not some so-called experts on the internet. READ IT. http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2565&Itemid=64 Don't let these people deceive, you and keep you ignorant about Islam and its end goal for the world. Read, research. Don't take my word for it, read what the Muslim scholars themselves say!! (iv) Just a quick history lesson. You mention Catholics, but they could have a reformation because Martin Luther and the others understood that the Church had strayed BADLY from the teachings of Jesus Christ.Most of the middle ages doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church like Inquisitions, Mary idolatory, praying to saints and to the dead, indulgences, bowing to idols, asking priests for forgiveness of sins, purgatory, transubstantiation, the Eucharist and many many heresies and false teachings simply CANNOT be found in any sentence in the New Testament. So there was a reformation to go BACK to the teachings of Jesus and then various other sects springing from Protestantism came to be. You're a non-Catholic Christian right? It was through this that whatever Christian sect you belong to came into being. So it's impossible for Islam to have a reformation because first of all the Qur'an, unlike the Bible is apparently supposed to be the dictated speech of Allah and if it tells Muslims to fight Jews and Christians, Muslims have to obey. b. "Anyone who does not practice this does not have a god". The false premise in this is that you think all gods are benign and holy. There is only ONE Holy and Righteous God and that is the YHWH, the God of the Bible. With all due respect, I do not consider the god of the Qur'an to be a righteous or holy deity, but the figment of Muhammad's imagination who granted Muhammad all his earthly desires in his "holy" book. The God of the Bible gave his only begotten Son as a ransom and substitutionary sacrifice for the sins of the world (John 3:16), the greatest act of love for his creation. The god of the qur'an wants his followers to be a sacrifice for themselves. To "kill others" and "get killed" for him. (Qur'an 9:111) with promises of virgins to deflower (Qur'an 56:36) This is why we have so many suicide/Jihadi bombers today in the Muslim world. And all these cries of "Islamophobia" are ridiculous. It's not "phobia" to criticize a religion/Ideology. No religion is EXEMPT from criticism especially when it's responsible for so much evil in the world today. I never criticize Muslims personally or mock them. But CHOULO already knows that, doesn't he? Nice try throwing out red herrings and distracting from the elephant in the room. Nobody is buying it anymore.
- 16,017 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I do agree that Muslims are the biggest victims of Islam. They're just too blind and scared to see it. And commands such as this from the "prophet" don't help either. Bukhari (84:57) : In the words of Allah's Apostle, Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him. Catholicism underwent a reformation and counter-reformation. An enlightenment period as well and did away with the barbarity and evil of Inquisitions. Islam has always been and is still a violent, supremacist Ideology. It refuses to compete in the market-place of ideas. It's no surprise because Muhammad, the founder of the religion also assassinated those who mocked him (Asma Bint Marwan) . Muslims are commanded to love Muhammad more than they love their own parents, spouses and children. So why should we be surprised when some of his followers do likewise (i.e assassinate those who mock him) even 1000's of years later?
- 16,017 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
So why respond directly to my comment then? I could also care-less if you're Catholic or not. That's a moot point.
- 16,017 replies
-
- governments
- laws of countries
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: