OhForAGreavsie

Yes, I would try to sell him that if he shows better defending. This is why I wrote of him 'sharing' RB/RWB duties with Reece. If Tino can dispel the doubts about his defensive contribution he would get enough game time and would be a powerful addition to our squad. If he does not show better defensive qualities however there can be no place for him back at The Bridge. I was a big fan of Tino's during his academy days, so I watched a fair bit of him at Saints. I didn't like what I saw defensively. His positioning was frequently awful.

Next up for the women an international break followed by Spurs at Stamford Bridge on 20th November, and Real Madrid at Kingsmeadow on 23rd November. https://www.chelseafc.com/en/tickets/womens-tickets

The girls inflicted ManU's first defeat of the season on Sunday. We now move up to second, behind Arsenal on goal difference although the Gunners have a game in hand.

Happy to lose this tussle.

Under ordinary tax treatment that's more than £23m a year gross. Can't see how it would make sense to offer Jorgi that kind of a contract. Obviously, the player's agent is going to go high at the start of negotiations but, if true, that number is a big overreach.

The 'problem of Reece James' must be a big part of why Tino left in the first place. Tough to see him rushing back to face being blocked again. In any case, I want to see improved defensive output from Tino before I'd support him coming back to share RB/RWB duties.

I'm 100% on board with targeting Lavia. Complicated deal but this is a must try for me.

I grew up in an era when the FA Cup was a monster, completely unrecognisable from the tournament it is now. I therefore have a huge emotional commitment to it which younger people do not. Winning that competition is always high on my agenda. However... If we win the FA Cup we would will still be a bad team. If we win The Champions League, we would still be a bad team. If we win The League Cup, we would still be a bad team. Winning a trophy this year is not about suggesting that we are a good team. It's about camouflaging the fact that we are a bad one. From the point of view of our status in the footballing world a little camouflage can do no harm, and might even help a bit. Also who doesn't like winning stuff. 🙂

Shame but I think she's made a sound decision to step aside.

I'll remind people that using the player at LWB was something I was strongly in favour of and then I will call it as I see it. I will sometimes say that I don't believe XYZ player is good enough but I never 'blame' them. They don't sign themselves and they don't pick themselves. Others make those decisions and others are responsible. Long way between here and there mind.

Can't really blame Chelsea yet. 🙂 For all I know I'm the only person on the planet who wants this, but I am utterly convinced he would be a huge success on the left. Has everything for the role.

Don't care. He has the attributes.

If the transfers we're all dreaming about come to fruition, then it looks like our current left backs will have done my work for me so no one will need convincing that Jasko Gvardiol should become our starting LB/LWB.

Plain and simple. And it didn't stop with the corruption of the bidding process. When people are forced by economic desperation to work in conditions which have cost thousands of them their lives, and this is done for the provision of entertainment, then I say not in my name. I won't be watching a single minute of this competition.

Agreed. I hope that Denis would have had a real squad role had TT stayed. Otherwise, it's hard to see what was behind this move. 🙂 If that were to be the case, it would be 'quite alarming' in the same way that the wings falling off the airplane you're on is quite alarming!

I think what @Vesper said, or at least implied, about Zakaria is correct. It seems that, for whatever reason, the club want shot of him in January and seem to be aware that Juve will not voluntarily agree to cancel the loan halfway through the season. One way out of this is that Juve can secure an alternative loan club for Denis after the world cup. If that's the scenario, then the two club per-season rule means we cannot play him 'even for one minute' as this would kill any chance of another loan. Another possible scenario is that there is an automatic break in the agreement if Denis does not play. This would still leave the mystery of why in that case does Denis keep being selected to the bench. Perhaps it's a signal that there is nothing wrong with him physically.

Thank you.

Great to see Omari training with the first team in the latest Trivago behind the scenes video.

A really encouraging factor in the calculation about whether to chase him or not. Do you remember if this the same Russian kid we were linked with previously? I watched some videos of that player and remember feeling that there was something there though I don't think I felt as positive as this. I'll take another look Very encouraging Very, very encouraging.

To be fair to the previous ones, they did try to buy Bellingham from Birmingham but he/his advisors were not interested. His actions then are part of what motivates my conviction that we won't get him. I was desperate that we should buy Bellingham but, when we and Utd tried to, he accepted an invitation to visit Carrington, but it was reported that he turned down the opportunity to look around Cobham. That was when Dortmund were the main competition. Now his options will be the best teams, and/or the biggest clubs, in the world. Our squad builders should make a pitch for Bellingham of course, but they shouldn't waste any emotional energy on the idea that we'd actually get him.

We won't get Bellingham.

I'm not too interested in Bruno. If we're chasing tough to get midfielders, I'd rather we try again for Lavia & De Jong.

Definite card.