Radamel Falcao

[Waterfall 893]

I usually prefer complete players with good finishing ability to great finishers with less complete game, but when you have Oscar, Mata and Hazard, the latter would be awesome. I think we are title favourites if we get Falcao in January

[CHOULO19 24,332]

yeah because this quote clearly doesn't compare both players assists last season does it? My Word!

Yes it does not, thank you for agreeing

[jmarlow 458]

Yes it does not, thank you for agreeing

I rest my case.

[zolayes 14,489]

You felt insulted because I've been proved correct by facts and you insinuations have been proved wrong?

I've proved you and Spike wrong time and time again in this thread, hell Spike admitted he has no clue who is on our bench and when Sturridge was injured. If saying you two are "playing dumb" is something you find insulting I suggest you grow yourself a backbone - I've not even began to insult anyone and this is not why I've signed up on this forum.

grow up ,,,internet warrior ,,, you proved nothing....Ive proved to have more backbone than you would ever know

[nadavTKL 1,787]

I think we are title favourites if we get Falcao in January

But WHY would they sell him in January? what's the rush?

[Las7 951]

Another goal for Falcao against Malaga tonight 4th minute, can't stop scoring 6 matches 8 goals in the League.

[Muzchap 8,966]

Yeah he is awesome and if we sign him think we can retain CL and take the premiership...

[Las7 951]

We can forget about Falcao, Mancini is watching the game together with Falcao's agent - it's the missing piece of City's puzzle they barely have any strikers

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

He will be ours!

[The Skipper 20,593]

We're not going to sign another striker for £50m when Torres is performing decently. Stop deluding yourselves.

[ChelseaKid10 35]

Fuck off Mancini .

Why don't you use Tevez/Aguero/Dzeko/Balotelli

[Las7 951]

We're not going to sign another striker for £50m when Torres is performing decently. Stop deluding yourselves.

We signed Sheva despite not needing him, we signed Torres despite having far more need for wingers and creative midfielders. To think there is anything logical behind our last 4 additions up top is illogical.

If we are not going to give Lukaku and Sturridge opportunities up top might as well sign up someone to really make Torres worry about his position. If City get Falcao, Dzeko and Balo become fare game and we should go for whoever out of the two is on the bottom of the pecking order at City.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

We can forget about Falcao, Mancini is watching the game together with Falcao's agent - it's the missing piece of City's puzzle they barely have any strikers

Source? i realy dont think they will go for him, its too ridiculous as they already have 4 top class strikers, whice is too much already.

[Las7 951]

Source? i realy dont think they will go for him, its too ridiculous as they already have 4 top class strikers, whice is too much already.

http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football/atletico-madrid/transfer-talk/news/mancini-watching-falcao_48937.html

The fact they have 4 top class strikers didn't stop Mancini wanting to sign RvP during the summer.

[The Skipper 20,593]

We signed Sheva despite not needing him, we signed Torres despite having far more need for wingers and creative midfielders. To think there is anything logical behind our last 4 additions up top is illogical.

If we are not going to give Lukaku and Sturridge opportunities up top might as well sign up someone to really make Torres worry about his position. If City get Falcao, Dzeko and Balo become fare game and we should go for whoever out of the two is on the bottom of the pecking order at City.

So because we made the mistake of signing strikers we didn't really need we should continue that way?

Too many hypothesises. You really can't tell whether the CFC board plus coaching staff are willing to give Sturridge and Lukaku a chance ATM, so blindly assuming that to justify a Falcao purchase doesn't do it for me. (Not you per se).

Listen, I really, really rate Falcao, but I can't see us getting him unless Torres is sold which is looking unlikely ATM. People shouldn't get their hopes up, that's all I'm trying to allude to really.

[The Skipper 20,593]

http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football/atletico-madrid/transfer-talk/news/mancini-watching-falcao_48937.html

The fact they have 4 top class strikers didn't stop Mancini wanting to sign RvP during the summer.

Man City will never sign Falcao unless they are planning to let Balotelli and/or Dzeko go, and if they are willing to bench either Aguero or Tevez which I can't see happening.

[Las7 951]

So because we made the mistake of signing strikers we didn't really need we should continue that way?

Too many hypothesises. You really can't tell whether the CFC board plus coaching staff are willing to give Sturridge and Lukaku a chance but chances ATM, so blindly assuming that to justify a Falcao purchase doesn't do it for me.

Listen, I really, really rate Falcao, but I can't see us getting him unless Torres is sold which is looking unlikely ATM. People shouldn't get their hopes up, that's all I'm trying to allude to really.

I don't have high hopes or anything I just know we will sign a striker in the winter and Falcao is everything a top club could look for in a striker.

As I've said it's painful to me but Sturridge and Lukaku were given a combined of two games up top a CFC, this year Lukaku was send on loan despite our squad bolstering only two players who can play there and the fact that Lukaku offers something completely different than both. Sturridge was on the bench for our opening 7 fixtures fully fit, he played 10 minutes up top and another 30 on the right wing. Sturridge is also guaranteed not to start in the next four fixtures after the international break, I'm sure Sturridge has had time to reflect during his injury. He is not given a proper chance up top while squads with more strikers have managed to give all the forwards time on the field and this is something I alluded before Sturridge was injured. Sturridge should be starting games and in Liverpool; Arsenal and Tottenham he would have been given a chance up top to prove himself - here he is given 10 minutes against QPR when our whole team started playing chaotically after 80 minutes of pretty much nothing. Sturridge has less time on the field as a striker than virtually every other forward we have signed over the age of 18. I doubt if I was in his position a start with our reserve squad against Manchester United in the Piss Cup is something he would boast about, and looking at our next 4 fixtures thats the only game there is a remote possibility he could actually start up top.

Man City will never sign Falcao unless they are planning to let Balotelli and/or Dzeko go, and if they are willing to bench either Aguero or Tevez which I can't see happening.

Mancini wants to get rid of Dzeko that much is obvious and Balotelli is a difficult character so I could surely see him also wanting to dispose of Mario as well. Like I've said he wanted to sign RvP and now his next target is Falcao, if he ends up signing Falcao we need to make sure we got offers lined up for both Dzeko and Mario I think our main rival for both will be Juve.

[laeth 527]

God I hate Mancini.

Can you actually prove it or are these just your opinions?