Reus and Bale BOTH Bridge-bound?

[zolayes 14,489]

If Bale was available for 50M we'd surely have to put a bid in...

if we could trade him for mikel

[Styles 9,790]

So Reus should be our main transfer target in January is the general consensus. But if for whatever reason he's not available at all, would people want to pay £50M for Bale? Prices around that kid of level are tempting.

50m and he would almost certainly become our highest paid player ever. THANKS BUT NO THANKS.

Hate repeating myself but Bale just isn't that good. Better players than him get bought and sold every summer for less than that.

[manpe 10,861]

Hypothetically if we were to get both of them, who would make room? Because both of them have to be starters. Bale is a winger, Reus would be bought in as a winger most likely.. so who makes way out of the two? Or would we drop Hazard? Not gonna happen, unless we make a swoop between Hazard<->Bale, which hopefully isn't going to happen. Why break a fully functioning team and start basically from scratch?

I call nonsense. Reus and Varane might be possible, though not so sure in the need of Varane either. Bale would have only happened if he were 30+ and we were still the Chelsea of 2007. At the moment he's A) too expensive, B )what I said above - would cause too much unnecessary headaches trying to fit in something that can't be fit in without taking something out.

[Spike 12,049]

My sides are in orbit.

Dear diary,

Today Alex was a fag.

[iceman 329]

i want Reus and one more returned gunner in EPL

[Liquidator 5,176]

If it meant Mo Salah packing his bags then I'd be all for it

[MichaelDance 552]

I wouldn't mind seeing them on the team but I do prefer Schurrle than Willian if we have to get rid of one player, but they both make Chelsea what we are today .

[iseah100 5,612]

Send Salah out!

[chelseafc9010 224]

if we could trade him for mikel

Mikel is three times the player.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

I wouldn't mind seeing them on the team but I do prefer Schurrle than Willian if we have to get rid of one player, but they both make Chelsea what we are today .

Willian?! You mean Salah surely, no?

[Nike 373]

I think chelsea needs to keep either willian/ramires in the starting 11..

So, if you drop willian for either reus or bale, rambo should start as cm...

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I think chelsea needs to keep either willian/ramires in the starting 11..

So, if you drop willian for either reus or bale, rambo should start as cm...

Agreed, even if we dropped Oscar into the midfield double pivot we'd probably get crucified in midfield with Hazard and Reus on the wings.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Bale for 90m is a big no, but for 50m, I would take him. He is well suited playing in PL, and anything to make Spurs fans go nuts.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

IF we get one of Reus, Bale, I will be more than happy. We dont even need both.

[chelseafc9010 224]

'Hazard and Rues'

Nearly makes me orgasm.

If this happens.. oh lord we will be good. But agree with others, Willian is super important, if you don't realise that you don't watch our games properly, he adds energy, ball retention, support and his runs up the pitch are brilliant, if Willian left (which he wouldn't, Jose loves him and so do we) then Ramires would have to play more.

Although I don't see why we need Hazard or Rues when we could just use Mikel in a second striker role.