Stingray

Ahaaa PSG! Cool

Aaaaaaaw sweet!!

Me too! I want an assburner wankvideo!

Let's both go :-) Ill bring the funny internet, you bring THE ASSBURNER

What. The. Fuck ...............

Yeeeeeeees : guys from yesterday: woiiiiiiiiiii, i told you soooooo.

GREAT IDEA!!!!! Lets sacrifice the assburner!!!!!!!

Offensive much, Doner Kebab? You can only dream of a Hagi. So be respectfull for nationalities.If you want to banter, do it right and not like the caveman you set out to be.

Hahahahahaha .... Exactly!

Now that I agree on! Wanting peace being the crux of the matter.

Damn, I love Champions League Football

Of course!

Two pieces please, one with Garlic sauce and one a bit spicy pussy cat!

1. You started on Finkelstein 2. The 'random photo of whatsoever' is pretty much THE most iconical pic of ww2 and the Shoah 3. It is PSYCHOLOGICAL not physiological effect- sigh Dude: you have a clear cut agenda , do not want to hear any info , and so on. Hence: this thread should be stopped because of its political proselitism. Also: muslims are NOT a homogenous group. Plus: because they have done wrong things, in NO WAY makes the other right, as you claim. It is NOT because suicidebombers are wrong, you are automatically right, Dare to think, junior.

Just playing, Sir Alex, just playing Meanwhile, have a drink!

Faster fucking up, he means

That is simply not true. He got shunned by Israel because he made research that indicated that even the Zionists made 'psychological profit' by abusing sources from the Shoah. Eg: This photo seems about shooting an adult and a kid however - the opposing soldiers however are cropped. The Nazi's werent shooting the kid and his patent(?) but it was marketed that way. No matter the atrocities committed, this DOES NOT serve any cause. Only the negationist cause who used this hoaxing to claim the entire Shoah was false. Fucking hell! This kind of thing is what Finkelstein put to the board. Admirable in terms of historical criticism and science. Too much for some agenda's. I taught Uni in the States and I teach in Europe. Believe me, the sources are way more objective on the European side when Shoah and the Diaspora is concerned. Ps: seeing you like to enter youtube one shots, i have no doubt you will dismiss any kind of evidence, however strong.

Well, i followed Suarez since his dutch period and Hazard since he was 16. Both years becore i became a blues fan. So yes, it is pretty much objective. I hope you do take into account form (Suarez is now shining- remember Eden in his last Lille year), peaks (Eden peaking is quite unplayable, even more than Suarez) and age (Suarez was nowhere near Edens level at this age, though now he has more consistency due to being older). All in all: Eden all the way, no blue tainted glasses.

So am I actually :-)

Right Ps: Eden will own him soon enough. If not already.

Wrong pussy you ladies filmed SCARY INDEED!!!

Because it is in no way - nor in its intention - a debate, an exchange of ideas. It is just derogation of the outgroup, which never leads to truth, only to further polarisation - check the entire social psychology research in the 60-70-80's. I am serious btw.

Mods should lock this.