communicate

Manu does not need lampard. People said their meidfield is shit. It's their dm that is bad. They have 2-3 great/good passer in carrick/scholes. They have one upcoming box to box in cleverly. They have anderson and fletcher that they can throw in there. Why do they need lampard

I am actually not shock at all. This is january window after all

It is very obvious squad wise even without Ba, we are the third best team in EPL

Yap and he basically won everything in his first year and he introduced tiki taka. I am pretty sure if we won ucl a little bit more convincingly rdm will be given more time

There is nothing to do with that. I have mentioned this a couple of times, RDM was offered 2 years contract only (Nobody received 2 years contract in football). That clearly showed that our board did not trust RDM

I probably need to watch the off side replay more to see whether that is an offside or not but that was 100 % penalty in my eye. Ba had a chance to get to the ball if the goalkeeper did not stop his progress. So even if it was a minimal contact, it was still a penalty

I think it is simply because Ba looked more dangerous in 10 minutes (1 goal and 1 penalty => both unfairly disallowed) than torres in 80 minutes.

I really don't understand why. I mean both times we were losing 1-0, I probably can understand if it was still 0-0.

I thought mikel signed a new contract a few months ago which mean our board want him here.I understand getting another player to cover for injuries but not 20 million for just cover. If he can play next to mikel/romeu then I am fine with it but he can't so if we sign fellainI and asuming lampard leave next season, our mid is going to be: Romeu/mikel/fellaini - ramires for next season

It does not make sense for manu and lamps so I really don't see it's happening. If he doesn't sign with us he probably will play for galaxy or China/qatar

They are not having a bad season. They are having a madness season. If he is not jose mourinho, he is already gone by now.

I am still nof sure why are we linked with him. Do we really need a another anchorman ? We have romeu and mikel for that . We need to get somebody who can play next to them.

Lol that is totally different. I heard it is a camouflage car so he can escape from mancini

I think it is more because it is not easy to movr pkayer like torres heck even kaka is still with rm

There are plenty of things that are more important than expensive cars. I am more concened about the size of the car

Let say we sign isco. He is 20 clearly need plenty of playing time to grow. We can only play 2 am at once. Even barca play with 2. Like you said let us forget about marin,piazon and kdb. Now we have 4 young players playing for 2 position. All of them need playing time to grow. Are you going to rotate them every game ? And let us asume mata will start most of the game for us. So it means 3 young players battling for 1 position. Nobody will be happy and their progress will be stagnant

Lol ya, like I said in a post a few page back. The only reason that you should consider getting another player in packed position is when you can get a huge upgrade in that position. Like what SAF did when he bought RVP, clearly he is a huge upgrade over welbeck even though in the long term this actually can benefit us because it hinder welbeck development. I thought welbeck partnership with rooney was outstanding last year

We actually were outplayed by benfica and mata actually played quite well against Napoli. It's very simple with mata and every am if you are outplayed he will not be influential because he does not have the ball as much as he wants.

The one thing that I really hate about that post is when he said we don't want another AM only because we already have plenty. Believe me if we can get Messi instead of isco, I will say I don't give a damn if we have 8 AM, get him

All this debates about Isco remind me of one of my FM save. I bought Hamsik,Isco,and one more no 10 (I don't remember another one). It can easily works in FM because in FM you just need to get all the best player and put them together and they can work. In real life you have to consider a lot of stuff. Playing 3 am means you don't have width and you also have to consider their defending skill.

I watched Brazil played several times and he is brazil no 10 and he always play as no 10 for us. You can move him to the wing but he will have tendency move back to the center

We moved from 433 to 4231 in the first place because we keep conceding from the left.

Oscar, winger. not going to happen. He is a playmaker

Have anybody watched this guy played ? It looks like he is a striker, strange I thought we are going to recall lukaku for next season

Actually this year is the only year Ronaldo can make a case. 1st year : Barca won everything,2nd Year:Xavi should have won it,3rd year: Barca won double.