Spike
Everything posted by Spike
-
Maybe I would've rescinded my remark if it wasn't met with condescension. Why don't you try something else?
-
And you mistook not once but twice that I actually care enough to pay attention.
-
Dunno, it was a month ago.
-
In regards to sexuality I think that Asian men are more popular today then ever before due to metrosexuality in the western media. Asian men tend to be more svelt in stature, hairless and more androgynous in facial features; compared to me, I'm fare more 'traditional' looking, hairy, broad chest and shoulders, thick hair, etc. The small penis could be a myth or a fact, fucked if I know, I don't go around measuring cocks. However, I wouldn't be surprised if an ethnic group has a common genetic strand that makes penis size smaller or larger than other genetic groups. Genes control everything and we are all very similar but very different. There is a reason my eyes are blue and yours are brown, my beard is redish and yours is black. Same with IQ, I wouldn't be surprised if Cambodians are the dumbest people on the earth, because fifty years ago they took all the intellectuals out in the rice fields and cut their heads off; kinda hard to have a intelligent population if all the genes that heighten intelligence are killed off. The 'boring' Asian might come from the more reserved in public nature of certain Asian cultures.
-
@Sir Mikel OBE I think our debate last night was argued from different perspectives. In retrospect I think I was debating a more economical approach versus your more cultural approach. That raises an important question; can a nation have a 'third world culture' but have a 'first world economy'? My guess is yes; when I look at nations like India that have a rich GDP but an overwhelming amount of poverty it really rings home the success of nations like America where the wealth is distributed not evenly but amongst more people.
-
Still, I'd rather have a shit life in 1920s Japan than a really shit life 2017 Afghanistan
- 15,923 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
I really believe you are stretching Korea, China and Japan to be third-world nations like Somalia and Syria. From what I know of 1920s Japan, it was a brief period of democracy and liberalism between the Meiji era and kamikaze WW2 Japan and I recall reading that Japan was one of the few nations that hadn't felt too much of the worldwide economic crisis. Korea, I'll give you because of Japanese occupation but not in the sense that it was 'third world'. Again, I'll disagree with that. Shit didn't hit the fan in China till the late 1930s, when huge wars broke out. It still wasn't at the point of poverty that occurred during the Great Leap Forward. There is a reason that it's called the Golden Decade. It's apple and oranges to compare those three places with nations like Somalia, Afghanistan and Syria, and in particular and I think you really sell your own heritage a little short. Korea, Japan and China may been far from the golden standard of Western Europe and the Western world but you really must appreciate that the West is the exception not the rule. I really don't believe these ghettos in Sweden can integrate given their self-preservation and hatred of Sweden. They cannot, they will not and it won't happen unless they are open to losing the less desirable aspects of their culture and assimilate into their new home's culture...There is a reason why Pakistani-English people are the most inbred people in the world, because they don't drop the worst of their own customs, think about it.
-
That was then, and it worked for those people; sadly the same hasn't happened in Stockholm with Syrians or whomever. There will always be success and failure; as thousands of variable come into play. I believe I read somewhere that before The Great Depression ~33% of immigrants returned home and the only two ethnicities that had a lower rate than that were Jews and Britons, not the success story that feed to us through an IV. Japanese culture is also not from a third-world country, a land torn apart by war, or a failed state. I think I'd take a few Japanese or Koreans over Somalians or whatever other crazy cultures behead people and drink virgin blood. Purpose is a also a huge factor; did your grandfather travel to American for the 'American Dream' or to extract wealth? There is a huge difference between wanting to join a society and taking advantage of a society. I can understand an eclave as a sort of sense of community within a larger overarching culture but I'm against a ghetto that clearly stands against the 'parent' culture. It serves no good for Sweden to house ghettos of cultures that hate Sweden.
-
Well it isn't inherently bad per se, but rather how it's administrated. The Romans successfully integrated hundreds of different peoples by preventing them from setting up ghettos and enclaves. It stops being a necessity for a group to integrate if they can just live within a 'Chinatown'.
- 15,923 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
I know! I always imagined Sweden as a snowy paradise full of frozen lakes for skating and slopes for skiing. Shame through their own kindness they have imported problems from lesser cultures and nations. It's such a sad reflection on our world that even kindness can be twisted into something negative.
-
Lacazette is phonetically exactly the same as 'la case ette' or 'the little African slave hut'. Hahaha, wat
-
Sweden is having issue to the point where the paramedical teams that run ambulances are asking for military escorts when they are called into the 'no-go zones'. Absolutely pathetic that a nation like Sweden has allowed these ghettos to grow. I knew the country was 'lost' when the 'feminist' city council of Stockholm rearranged snow-ploughing resources from the roads into the footpaths because 'more women use the footpaths and they deserve equal opportunity to use them'. Turns out when the roads aren't ploughed infrastructure bogs up and turns into the worst traffic crisis in Stockholm history. EDIT: sources as follows; http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/773310/Swedish-medics-military-equipment-enter-no-go-zones-Ambulance-Drivers-Union http://www.aftonbladet.se/ledare/ledarkronika/evafranchell/article23889514.ab
- 15,923 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
@Sir Mikel OBE @kmk108 Good talk about the Yiannopoulis controversy.
-
I love these. libertarian-right 4 lyfe
-
All it takes is one term to be ambiguous. That is the reason why anchor babies exist in America. In 1982 Plyer vs Doe a supreme court ruling had one single statement that changed the laws of America allowing children born in the US to be de-facto citizens. Anti-hate, anti-violence, anti-discrimination is already covered by the Canadian government all this does is create a new set of all that apply to people only of a certain faith; that isn't equality. Ambiguity creates loopholes to be exploited. ' no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment "jurisdiction" can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful.'
-
I'm not obsessed with race, the statement from the Ontario government is; I never mentioned white people in concerns with hate speech, that is you. Arson is illegal regardless of this law, that is a pointless statement to make because this isn't about arson, it's about free speech. You seem to think I'm anti-Islam, did you not read what I posted? You are just projecting a European right-wing rhetoric on me. I don't give two tosses about Islam or how many Muslims have jobs but Islam doesn't deserve rights above or below any other religion and when an Ontario law forbids any form of Islamophobia (that will include criticisms) I do have an issue. I'd have the same issue with Christianity, Judaism or damn Zoroastrianism. What is stopping a Muslim from conflating 'I disagree with Sharia' as hate speech? As that can easily be considered as intolerance to a fundamental aspect of Islam.According to section two of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms; all Canadians have the right to criticise religion; including Islam; what the Ontario government has done is in direct violation to this section. 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. If we look at the semantics of the statements if a minority group that is new to the nation is 'significant' then what are the Quebecois? 'Astronomical'? Canada was 90% white up until 1996, where is this historical 'diversity' outside of different white ethnic groups? I'm obsessed with the truth, not race and the truth is that the Ontario statement is a plain lie and I hate it when governments lie; that is the source of my dispute.
-
That's not really a 'significant contribution' though, Canada isn't exactly lacking in doctors, teacher, garbos or taxpayers. I don't give two shits about Muslims but I do give several about the truth and the truth is that Canada has never been diverse and the most important people in Canadian history are white people; that isn't racist that is just simply what happened. It seems like they are almost embarrassed by their own history and are using wording to erase that history. Besides, it is a restriction of free speech if I can talk smack about one institution and not another.
- 15,923 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
So this was just passed in Ontario, Canada Does that mean people can't say 'Fuck Islam' but can say 'Fuck Catholicism'? So when I think of Canada, I think of the Scottish, English and French; hence the reason everything has a French or Scottish name. I'm just curious what 'significant contributions' Islam has made in Ontario. I wouldn't expect Turkmenistan to state 'significant contributions' from the Sudanese if it simply isn't true. Canada has never been diverse either...it's always been dominantly white.
-
My edited post: But at the end of the day, most of the best countries in the world would just be drawing strings in comparison and would be down to the person that lives in the nation. The US, Canada, NZ and Australia all share cultural roots, live in the anglosphere and have an unprecedented level of freedom and equality and that's my preference. Hell, someone's preference might be Sharia...
-
If they didn't immigrate the attacks wouldn't have happened.
-
Denmark isn't western Europe, which is what you mentioned earlier. New Zealand is ranked higher on HDI than every country in western Europe except for the Netherlands. But at the end of the day, most of the best countries in the world would just be drawing strings in comparison and would be down to the person that lives in the nation. The US, Canada, NZ and Australia all share cultural roots, live in the anglosphere and have an unprecedented level of freedom and equality and that's my preference. Hell, someone's preference might be Sharia...
-
It may not be directed at any people on here. People on facebook in particular are silly.
-
'ken hell cunt
-
Gotta keep the trolls, mongs, nay-sayers and twats around to keep things interesting. If not I should've been banned after one post...
-
Your right, I should have thrown the Netherlands into that discussion as well; the Dutch were very important for the creation of the USA. You're on an English website for an English team of an English sport; England is more important culturally in the west than all of western Europe. Hell, wasn't Belgium created through British support and lawmaking after the 1830 Flanders uprising?