nullabletype

"I don't even want none of the above, I want to piss on you."

:cfc: Goals and highlights... :cfc:

Just to add to your collection...

Oh, he comes out gracious in victory and acting all nice. This was a campaign built on intimidation and ballet stuffing if ever there was one! I'm revolting.

Yeah you're right, I've never seen you before, rumbled! I just pretended I had for the good of my health because that would be a worth while endeavour. But if you do want an other example, one of the run ins you had was with my own brother! I have nothing to say on that touching story about how you couldn't let the legend go. Feel free to have the last word again. I will not reply to it, honest.

Yeah, I was born in Buckingham Palace and raised by the Queen. As for your whole bit about education, I have a whopping 2 GCSE's with C grades. That doesn't stop me taking the time and making the effort to type posts that make sense. Now, would I have said you were the worst poster should you have agreed with me? Well no I wouldn't (however I would still of thought it), but purely because we wouldn't of been having the conversation and I wouldn't just bring it up for no reason. That said, as I mentioned in my previous post, I've seen you have plenty of run ins with others on this forum and I've always thought you've had a terrible attitude and are a real mouth piece. Anyway, let this be the end of it, because you've more than enough times explained you don't care what anybody has to say, which begs the question, why are you on a public discussion forum? (don't answer that).

:confused:

Sort of key in a forum situation where we have to read and write to communicate is it not? He literally scored the game before this, are you genuinely writing him off already?

Sloth, the most hilarious thing about you is that nearly every barney you're part of (and I've seen a few), you actually believe you're not the mug in the conversation. It's hard to explain to you how much of a clown you can be at times because you're so pig headed and stuck in your ways. You can't structure sentences to save your life. It makes just about everything you type a nightmare to read... That for example, is just diabolical. In regard to your poor lack of communication. Your whole point here was that in this situation Torres must score. Well the other side to that argument is that the keeper must save. However, both can't always come out on top. So it would be incredibly harsh to critique either. Now I'm not asking you to agree with me, but I explained this to you in multiple ways. Quite a number of people "liked" the posts which suggests to me they could understand what I was getting at because I typed it clearly and concisely. Then you come in having completely missed the point, telling me I've mixed up "must" and "will" in spite of the fact that nowhere had I demonstrated such a mix up. The very fact that you thought I had, goes to show that it is you, who is mixed up. Take just this select sample of some of your trash posts and toss in all the petty, childish insults you use and you have the perfect recipe for a terrible poster. The worst part in all of this is, I've actually seen you post decent comments before. You only seem to start acting the tosser when people confront you and you get confused. Which is a terrible attitude to have, particularly on a forum where it's going to happen a lot. As soon as somebody disagrees with you they're a retard, dick weed getting told to fuck off etc. So perhaps from now on you could take the time to type posts that make sense, stop mistaking your confusion for other peoples, and stop insulting folks you don't agree with.

The impression I got from the interview and others I was speaking to on another forum, was that Jose was getting at the help that Barcelona receive from referees.

Terrible penalty shout you're right, Javi Garcia got all of the ball and none of Ashley... oh wait,

1-0, Lampard 21' (P) 1-1, Javi Garcia 85' 2-1, Meireles 90'

First of all, learn how to structure a sentence before calling somebody a retard. Secondly, I expected a good player in Torres regardless of price. As such, I don't feel the need to bring it, but you did. So don't take the hump with people because they can't read your mind. We can only go by what you type, and if you can't express exactly what you mean, then that's your problem Trust me, I know exactly what you're saying. There is no confusion between must and will like you seem to think there is. You're the one who seems to have a poor grasp on communication, and it's you who is not following the discussion. How you survive on this forum is beyond me.

Well apparently you are that dumb because it was you who brought up the price tag. If, like most people you don't subscribe to the price tag nonsense then don't bring it up, because it will only give the impression that you do believe it and you're using it as part of your argument, and people wont have to call you out on something you allegedly don't buy in to. So do us all a favour and only type what you actually feel is pertinent. But your logic is completely flawed, I don't know how better to tell you this. If what you say follows, then every top EPL striker who gets in to that position must score, every time, bar none. And I'm sorry, but it's daft and completely unrealistic. I mean for god sake, you're the one saying... You bollock me for supposedly talking like one, but you expect mere fallible human athletes to perform like them! Anyway, I'm done talking to you because we'll only end up going around in circles. I'll keep talking like a robot, you keep talking like a haggis.

Please tell me this if you will, what has 50 million actually got to do with anything? This is an athlete we're talking about, his price tag has literally zero to do with his performance, in fact, it's basically just an arbitrary number. If I buy a Fiat Punto for £100,000 does that mean it should have 500hp and do 0-60 in 3 seconds? No! He was bought for a stupid price agreed upon by the two clubs. A factor in which he had no say. And I'm sorry to break this to you, but the best strikers in the world do miss sitters (and the shot you're talking about may have been straight forward enough, but it was not a sitter), it happens. Strikers don't have 1/1 goal to shot ratios no matter how much you pay for them. All the experience and talent in the world doesn't make up for human error. And by the way, don't tell me to fuck off. I've never had a problem with you before, but I've seen you have run ins with multiple poster on this forum. More often than not you come across as a petulant child, and irrelevant, non-productive comments like "you should sign up to RAWK" don't help with that image. Just looked at your profile, your 17 years old. If you want to talk to the big boys how about you act like one.

But the other side of that coin is that he was in the right place at the right time and was nailed on for a goal only for some great defending to deny him. His work lead to the goal. In other words, had he not of been in that position to strike it in the first place, it probably rolled across the face of goal and nothing would of came of it.

Sloth, for all his past achievements, goal records and ability, unfortunately sport by it's very nature is not a game of absolutes. And so my point still stands, anybody else makes that shot, the world goes, "oh, poor effort" and then forgets about it. Because it happens to the very worst, right up to the very best. However, because this is Torres, the harsh criticism gets milked for all it's worth, and then, despite the fact that he creates two assists and scores a goal, people still find the time to moan even though our teams problems are greater than him.

He only had two defenders on him and a keeper in his path... No pressure then. And the point here really is had that chance of been any other striker in the league, you wouldn't have people blowing it up as if it was easy, it would of been par for the course and never spoke of again. And even if I were to concede that the first chance was easy, it doesn't change the fact that the rest of the chances were not, and people getting on his back as if he missed four sitters is ridiculous. Particularly when he finished the game with a goal and 2 assists.

What did I do to get in the running?! Thanks folks

Member #3082!

So I was out when it happened but just seen a replay and wow, Barcelona's second penalty. The ball wasn't even in play! And when the ball was back in play, yes the Milan player was fouling, but he was also being fouled. Got to love Barcelona. Tossers. Don't forget there's an extra two at each end to chime in when they need help too.

Your logic is as follows... If AC Milan beat Barcelona; Then great. We can beat AC Milan so you're happy to go through. If Barcelona beat AC Milan; You'll accept a Benfica defeat because we can't compete with Barcelona. But taking your stance that AC Milan are beatable, what have you learned from a Barcelona win? Nothing. Because all you assert is that a team you considered beatable by Chelsea, got beat by a team who could also beat Chelsea. So then why not have a crack at Barcelona anyway? You've got to be in it to win it. The point being, to assume AC Milan are any less a threat should they beat Barcelona based on a hand picked boxing analogy is madness. Almost wanting to get knocked out if Barcelona beat AC Milan is absurd.

[Post Match] Aston Villa 2-4 Chelsea: In this thread, people who watched the game talk like they didn't watch the game Some odd points of view in here... Entitled Chelsea fans, all the goals or bust.

This is fuzzy logic if ever there was. If AC Milan beat Barcelona, arguably the best footballing side in the world and who you claim we have "no chance" against, then they pose as much of a threat as Barcelona themselves. So following your train of thought, what chance do we have against AC Milan? So... If you fancy our chances against Milan assuming they beat Barcelona, then why wouldn't you fancy our chances against Barcelona from the get go?