changingman2000

Anybody mate, And I mean ANYBODY would be better than Grant. Dowie, Allen, Curbishley, Zola and Cassa, fucking Poyet, Ernie, Bergerac, you name it, anybody? Simply because this Limp cunt hasnt got a clue. I hate him more than I hate Man Ure

The tide of opinion begin's to turn, welcome aboard JBD

Wasnt it embarrassing watching Grant stumble around the team talk after the 90mins?, As a Chelsea fan I fucking cringed. He is a complete and utter wanker of the highest order and I would rather have the cunt shot than spend another week at our club. Everything he does is a joke, he acts like a cunt, he looks like a cunt, he talk's like a cunt.

Article on Football365 Spurs Break In To Divorce Grant From Roman Posted 25/02/08 09:48EmailPrintSave A few questions and attempted answers after Spurs beat Chelsea to win the Carling Cup... Has The Big Four Domination Been Broken? Technically, the answer has to be yes. It wasn't the way they intended but in winning the Carling Cup, Tottenham became the first club not called Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool or Manchester United to win a domestic trophy in England since Middlesbrough in 2004. That they did so by beating one of the Big Four teams in the actual final itself, and another in the semi-final, makes their success all the more creditable. Nonetheless, most observers will only consider that the Big Four's closed shop has been broken once Spurs - or, for that matter, Everton, Villa or Manchester Citeh - have earned a Champions League berth at their expense. As far as the rest of the league is concerned, the significance of Sunday's match is that it has closed up another route into Europe via the Premier League. The Manchester City players last week threatened with the inconvenience of a summer outing in the Intertoto Cup and Portsmouth, a club that has never qualified Europe, will have bemoaned Jonathan Woodgate's cheeky winner almost as much as the Chelsea players. What Happens If Olympiakos Score First? Chelsea's Champions League goalless draw in Greece on Tuesday night was interpreted as being a reasonably successful result. But their failure to register an away goal will take on a new perspective should the Greeks score first next week at Stamford Bridge. For who, after watching Chelsea produce just one shot on goal in normal time against Spurs, would back Avram Grant's team to then score twice? Supporters have never been privileged to an official explanation for Jose Mourinho's dismissal in September, although the club have made no attempt to refute reports that it was a consequence of Roman Abramovich's disillusionment with the Mourinho method. It is a shame that the Russian is already a mute because Sunday's performance may have made him genuinely speechless. The only difference from the bland, pale Mourinho era was the absence of a goalscoring threat. And the fact that they lost - an indignity the Special One never suffered in a final during his tenure. Who Picked The Chelsea Team? The most interesting item in Monday's newspapers is the claim, to be found in The Independent, that Grant was coerced into selecting both John Terry and Frank Lampard against his better judgement. According to the newspaper, 'In bringing back Terry and Frank Lampard, Grant did what every Chelsea fan will have regarded as the sane thing. He didn't intend to do so earlier in the week but there are, once again, matters afoot at Stamford Bridge. Pressure has been exerted from some quarters, whether from the players or above, and the manager's plans were altered.' It is an astonishing - if vague - claim and one that will further disconcert Chelsea supporters not so much disgruntled by Mourinho's removal as his replacement by a man whose primary qualification is his close association with the owner... Is This The Beginning Of The End For The Silent One? So what is it that Grant does if he doesn't pick the team? Judging by events on Sunday, it certainly isn't the team talk. It was noticeable that, while the Israeli skulked in the background, it was Steve Clarke who cajoled the bulk of the team at the end of the 90 minutes and John Terry who took centre stage during the extra-time interval. As such, Grant's debunked claim that he made the half-time pep-talk that inspired the comeback win at Fulham in January takes on a new resonance. Victory on Sunday would have provided Grant with welcome room for manoeuvre - although hardly vindication given that he is working with inherited tools. Instead, defeat, and especially its manner, has boxed him into a corner. Even that close association with Abramovich will not be sufficient to save his skin if the next few months do not provide some rare entertainment and success in the Champions League. Mourinho's sacking just three months after lifting the FA Cup provided a sobering indication to what extent the competition has been debased. Unfortunately and ironically for Grant, the Carling Cup gained unexpected relevancy on Sunday. Pete Gill Your Comments johnpaparazzi "BRING BACK JOSE....HE'S THE MAN..ALL OF you NERDS DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT FOOTBALL...ENOUGH SAID..!" ChelseaBoy "I have been amazed at the level of inanity concerning the Carling Cup Final - Yes Chelsea wanted to win - Yes they were outplayed - but since when is there any point in raving about a dubious penalty - (BTW the first time a linesman has got involved in signalling for an infringement since I can't remeber when!)and a goal scored by Woodgate which he knew nothing about, Cech having punched the ball onto the back of his head! CFC had played 33 games and lost two up till Sunday - now it's 34 and lost 3 - hardly crisis time!!! Glad to see the Yids winning for a change - they deserved it. But let's get real! Crisis? What Crisis???" JDShark "what is with these annoying spurs fans?? the article is meant to be about Chelsea's current problems, magnified by their carling cup loss, not about the final itself. get a clue. gawd, you ppl remind me why exactly i hate the spurs.... " Fairplayforall "The most annoying thing to me was the attitude of the Chelsea players when receiving their r/you medals. Just to look at their faces proved to me that they are very poor losers. I look forward to the day when they become the music hall joke of the country, as they were many years ago. On the day, two average teams made the final look good. " jason365 "I've read better reports in the village life regarding sunday afternoon kick around in the kids playground. A poor attempt at making a story and hardly mentioning the main reason for yesterdays result. Tottenham Hotspur!!!! Is it supposed to make a better and more interesting story to say how poor a team was instead of saying how good Spurs were? A typical crap article which tries to slag Chelsea off instead of praising what should be Spurs triumph. The guy didn't even put in a spell check. Chelsea?? Send him back to school to spell before you give him another job on here." algern0n "Nizm: Be nice to the poor bloke. Little Pete is having a hard time swallowing that Spurs will end up with more trophies than Arsenal this season. " Nizm "Who does Pete Gill support? To read his article anybody would think that Spurs weren't even playing yesterday, let alone winning! If PG doesn't support Arsenal then he supports Chelsea - and either way post-cup final reaction that doesn't mention the winners has got to be one of the most biased pieces of journalism ever. Shocking. But unsurprising - PG is probably as muzzled at F365 as Grant is at Chelsea. The only difference is the paymaster" IrishBlue "I got to say as a Chelsea fan I was reserving my opinion on Grant till the end of the season. Against the top teams we have looked distinctively average, and against Totenham we were nothing short of awful. Anelka was out of his depth on the wing - not his fault he was out of position. Every eejit knew that we needed to go 4:4:2 pushing him up top, or replacing him with Joe Cole. It was an insanity and awful management. I think he should go and be replaced by a coach with a pair of balls, if Jose was in charged we may still have lost but would have finished the game with as many attacking players as possible on the pitch, he had the bravery to go for it when behind. Top coaches need that." gimzy "Hell i noticed that too. Grant was just walking around while Terry did the team talk at Extra time. Chelsea lost fine but the manner in which the team lost the game and their pattern play left much to be desired. No graft, no guile and no sense of urgency in the team. " Ezy_Rider "Is the word not 'relevance'? And how come Middlesbrough and Bolton reaching the final in 04 wasn't a sign of the big four dominance being broken?" All comments on this story

Rick with a silent "P"

Elliott, Were starting to agree on most things again mate. Never healthy

We got what we deserved mate, It was definitely a moody penalty and a very, very lucky winner but they were by far the better team all round sadly, pains me to say it but true. We had no invention, no creativity, fuck all. In some ways, It may be just what we needed. Because a win would have simply being papering over the cracks. I'm convinced Roman is chucking money at the senior players to keep them from cunting off Grant in public. As for Poyet, Once a True Chelsea legend, But then Leeds, now Rottenham, Probably end up as manager of QPR and guide them to glory in the Champions League (in a couple of years you understand) :thumbsdown:

sick to my stomach, Ray Houghton has been cunting off Grant big time on talkSPORT, and everything he is saying is spot on. End of 90mins Grant looked a complete cunt, end of first period of extra time it was Terry who was giving it the gee up. He is nothing more than a fucking charlatan. I simply cannot believe that he still has his backers. I know the players have a huge responsibility, course they have, but when you look for motivation, inspiration, would YOU look to Grant? Fucking Russell Grant maybe

What a fucking joke. a Lifeless performance on the whole and, without doubt, Rottenham deserved it. If this puts Grant in a new light in Roman's eye's then I can perhaps stomach it. He looked completely lost out there. Did anyone see the cunt cuff his snot on his sleeve like a school boy lost, when he was trying to, erm, "motivate" the team at the end of the 90? Also mass confusion when it looked like Cole was all set to come on, then it was suddenly Ballack instead, all the agruing on the bench, etc. And when the fuck did we last score from open play??? And please dont bring fucking Huddersfield into this. Bottom line, when this cunt was appointed, He talked up all the "expansive" football we would see. Oh fucking really? Not much sign of it so far, In fact, Its obvious we are playing far more poorly then when Jose was in the chair. No doubt Jose will have a wry smirk on his face right now eh Avram Grant, the backest chapter in our clubs history, And thats fucking saying something. We've had some shit managers in the past, Blanchflower, Hurst, Hollins, Porterfield etc, but at least they all had football pedigree. So, you'll be surprised to know I am blaming Grant, 100%. If Jose was there we wouldnt have lost the lead, pure and simple. Avram Grant

Sorry, cant comment, too busy getting some practise in with a 7.62 sniper rifle

One way I keep re-assuring myself over this debacle is that Roman hasnt got where he is today buy making shoddy management decisions with regards to his businesses......Until he appointed this cunt. What has he thought, sitting through some of the performances recently? He certainly cant be enjoying it mate. I just hope the situation changes drastically in the close season. On a very, very, very, hugely, very negative point, What do you reckon the reaction would be towards him if another lacklustre display against the Yids seen us lose the final? :thumbsdown:

Nice, I'm surprised the Met aint being banging my door down already then eh? Then again, They'd need to travel to darkest Glasgow to do so Anyway, for the record, My name is Mahat Goldberg Mohammed, Of No:6, Synagogue Place, Mosque Street, The West Bank. SW1A 1AA "We love you Avram, we do, we love you Avram, we do, We love you Avram, we do, OHHHHHHHHHHH Avram we love you" Renounce the heretic's that call themselves Fulham Broadway and Misschief. BURN THE FUCKERS AT THE STAKE

Fair play, you have a very, very good candidate :thumbsup:

Nails mate, Nails

Oh Really?, strange, I thought Esk held a wee torch for Grant's hammer throwing road digger. Not going to be hypcritical about this as I absolutely detest the cunt with a passion. Would I want him dead? well no, I dont want anyone to die ideally. However, if he carries on with this charade at our club then bitterness is only going to rise from certain factions further. Not just right wing factions, etc. But real fans who are utterly pissed off that this charlatan continues to impose himself very, VERY badly at Chelsea. In twenty years time we will be looked back as a laughing stock for appointing this tit as manager. As the saying goes "From the sublime to the ridiculous" that sums up our managerial change. More expansive football? why dont we get Kenyon in front of the camera's and just explain, in VERY simple terms just how expansive our football has become under that wank stain. I'm still kind of hoping that this is all part of a masterplan to install some top of the range manager in the close season, who wasnt available earlier. Two chances I know, slim, and none but fingers crossed eh. Either way, I'm certainly not going to sympathise with the cunt, far from it

We were shit, truly shit. Shit against the scousers, Mediocre against Huddersfield, Shit last night. My, this attacking football is wonderful. Roman must be so pleased for himself. Wonder what the response will be if we lose to Rottenham on Sunday? Lets face it, their tails are up, whereas we have everyone fit again, but are absolutely fucking woeful just now. A spot of coffee smelling may be on the agenda for a few people soon methinks

It was only Persil, sent so he could give his face a good scrub so he could get that stupid fucking look off it and "Cough" after last time FB?!

And my top three aaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeee: Bremner

Correct on both counts

I beg to differ, FB is entirely correct. Then again, I could be getting forgetful due to age eh?

My Generation?

JBD old boy, If I hear one more time how long you've supported the club I will spit my dummy out, throw my toys out the pram and take my ball home. I've supported them over 30 years, Mr FB is I would guess a tadge longer and Misschief around the same length of time.....Who fucking cares? I would have thought the only reason this would come into play would be when the younger supporters, pre/post Roman etc have an opinion that is clearly going to differ in relation to the older fans. The younger fans would no doubt have a rabies attack if we only, for example, took a point from Anfield, Old Trafford, etc. Whereas the older brigade still shudder at the memories of travelling back from the likes of Scunthorpe and Scarborough empty handed. Doesnt take a lot of working out that the comparisons are somewhat "Vast". The younger fans today will attend home games and not give a second thought to what the Bridge used to be like years ago, sitting on fucking concrete benches, 12' high fencing, Old William nicking you for as much as looking twice at them, etc, etc. But thats not a fault of younger fans, age gaps, pure and simple. Mention "Save the Bridge" to half the people on here and what would it mean to them? With regards to Kenyon, There are people on here, possibly such as yourself who wouldnt care a jot if Mr Blobby was our Chief exec, and thats their look out. Personally, I think the guys a cunt, Not quite the same level of cunt as Avram, but a cunt nonetheless. But thats my opinion, which is what it is, an "Opinion", and the good thing about an "Opinion" is that no one can say that your "opinion" is wrong. Finally Mr JBD, Why the fuck should I, or anyone else, "Fuck off and support someone else" just because I dont agree with the internal politics of MY club?? after all, I have invested a fucking fortune over the years on my club and I feel I have a right to get the right fucking hump when certain cunts treat MY club like a fucking franchise. That is my right old bean, I'm not asking you or anyone else to join me in getting the hump, that is their choice, their look out. Finally, I have an idea, Why not offer David Dein the Job and fuck Kenyon off?, I think he'd do a better job and with his "Influences" within the FA we might not get so many players fucking banned eh?

Ah the feral youth of today

Its all about Moral Fibre dear boy. As was stated earlier, He is a self proclaimed Man Ure supporter, and was earning an ample wedge with them, The club of his dreams. Why then move to one of your hated enemies?, just for the cash when he's already wedged up? If you were earning £2M a year at Chels, and the Bin Dippers (Thats Liverpool in case you were unaware) offered you £4M........would you take the bait?

Esk and David EU, you never fail to surprise me, If its not bad enough supporting Grant your backing Kenyon as well??? Blinkered, but somewhat stronger than that, at worst. You two would do wonders at Old Trafford. On the Blue Revolution DVD, Kenyon showed just what a prick he is. "You need to win TWO champions Leagues over ten years to be GREAT". Hmmmm ok, So Fergie, Wenger, Busby, Revie and Stein are Mickey Mouse eh?". Lets face facts boys, he would never have came anywhere near Chels if it wasnt for the Rouble, And you two are head over heels