Henrique

He is the man to lead us to CL trophy and to sexy football. Hiddink is also one of the greatest coaches ever, he still has unfinished business in football. He deserve more than managing mediocre national teams, as hes been doing in last years.

Actually I was thinking about him playing as GK.

I thought you were going to ignore me...

We wont struggle to find a player better than Mikel. Mikel is the kind of player who can easily make silly mistakes in crucial games. Lampard ir old. He should do a more defensive role in next years.

you'll wont ignore me not because I'm not worth your time, since most of your posts are to reply me. You will ignore because you have no arguments.

No. Sell Mikel anyway.

Pirlo is a defensive midfielder, he still has some years of good football. If he come for free it would be really good.

seelling Mikel woud be a wise move.

Indeed. In fact Robinho was 40m...but its because the media need this kind of bullshit. Before City, we were the mad guys, and there were lots of bullshits, like "Chelsea to pay 100m for Adriano". In 7 years of Abramovich, the only mad move we made was 50m for Torres.

eldinho, Berbatov being better than Hernandez was not he point of his post. I know that you know it.

I never said Ancelotti should be sacked "because we didnt won anything in one season". I'll ignore you, because you are not worth my time, but when you talk to me try to not use this kind of offensive words.

I really hope Neymar won join us as long as Carlo stay as manager. He will destroy his football.

they are great, but they are not top. I cant see them winning anything great in next 5 years.

ANCELOTTI: ONE LAST PERFORMANCE Suggestive http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~2363821,00.html

no. we made an official bid last summer. but right now theres nothing, just speculation.

Just speculation.

Anyway, this is his pregnant girlfriend:

Its not We. Its City.

We know that Roman is not the wisest man in the transfer window. Dont forget he paid 50m for Torres.

I understood, but as zolayes said its not a convincing argument. What he said was basically: Chelsea have to accept that in Europe as long as Barça is there they have no chance. In PL as long as MU is there they will dominate it.

but in this case Luiz is better than Cahill, and the price were almost the same.

First thing, Brazil don't need any help from Chelsea or any club in Europe to win the World Cup. Second thing, most part of you asking saying that Chelsea should have more youth form England...when you speculate about who should Chelsea buy, I never see any of you asking for players from England. When the window opened back in January everybody wanted Torres, Torres, Torres and Torres but Carrol was cheaper, and were a better buy than Torres imo, and the fact he is from England was another that he was a better buy. Torres is a fucking overrated player. Carroll is still young, and playing for a top club like Chelsea ( Liverpool is not a top club ) would help him to develop his football and also would help English NT. Ashley Young is a superb young talent, instead there is always people saying we should buy "Aguero" or "Someplayernovic". So, I really font understand you asking Chelsea to help english football.

I thought about that...maybe that already happened, and they fooled everybody last year, saying that Neymar was staying with Santos, when in fact Santos already got all the money and his pay rise is paid by Chelsea...lol

There always be space for good players, if english or not. If We lack a english spine its because English lack good young talents. For Chelsea is cheaper to buy a young english talent, and If We ere looking outside to find good fresh blood when it meand spending more money, its because we are strugling to find it in UK.