joe_kura

if CM opinion is boring so why did you even bother to read it??? you should create a forum to show your support for Chelsea with avram!! i personally respect CM for his opinion although sometimes i didn't agree with him but I DESPISE the like of YOU, trueblue and badboy who always claiming other fans who wants grant to be sack more than anything are bunch of worthless fans!!!

warnie, you should look at yourself. you also give lots of wrong facts. sorry

bollocks? it is only my OPINION judging from what i've SEEN what anelka is capable of and have done, not by his namesake. cant i have my opinion, that is DIFFERENT from you? its a SAME POSITION but slightly DIFFERENT ROLE. i'm not suggesting anelka to play as a AM or CB or CM or GK bla bla bla. i believe our footballing knowledge is no much better than each other so please stop calling people's opinion an utter bollocks! a penalty and a setpiece? its not the big star mistake that we concede the goal and couldnt find the goals we needed. it simply wrong choice of tactics and less preparation between the 1st team players, thanks to grunt. and ballack have an off-day against the 'mighty' olympiacos.

i've read the post and it is ONLY bluelion and cracker who fancy anelka played wide on the left while esk only tought Grunt will play anelka at the left. it is only THREE post out of 17. sorry to say this but i still remember you insist on ballack said, ' he was loud in the dressing room' while on Chelsea official website stating what ballack said was 'IT was loud in the dressing room'. so please get your own facts right before questioning other's. http://www.talkchelsea.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=713 supporting striker is still a striker, only for the latter is given much forward position. so why do you said it is out of position? why anelka couldnt play as supporting striker? he had proved he can scored goals from inside or outside the penalty box, he can hold the ball, his passing is good, he can assist goals and did that recently. he can always change the role with drogba through out the game when it suits the game. Grunt get it all wrong. the team played week in week out with 2 wingers in 4-3-3 formation, but he changed it to 2 centre-forward and 1 winger although the basic formation is still the same. the new approach need to be prepared thoroughly and the player should be told who is playing much earlier so that they are able to train with each of the chosen 1st eleven, watch the teammate video to understand his prefered movement and discuss more detailed about it, create attacking set play, discuss on defensive duty and create understanding with each other especially between the untried partnership of anelka, drogba and SWP. and finally he didnt motivate his players although he claimed to be a motivator.

warnie666, from what i'd read here and also my own opinion, punters bla bla bla, most of us want anelka to be a striking partner to drogba in 4-4-2 formation with either one as a supporting striker, not as a wide player in 4-3-3 formation as you mention. it is a big difference between partnering the striker and playing out wide. ballack have an off day at greece while lamps on sunday, in my opinion is the best of the midfield three, essien is worst, i hardly know that he is playing. but the tactic is all wrong. two centre forward with a wide players in 4-3-3 formation just didnt work. jose have tried it before (sheva, drogba, robben).

warnie666, it is not bluelion who made the called on team selection. the problem is not the rotation policy, it is Grunt, who tried very hard to look good instead of winning games. Jose had deploy these formation (3 centre midfielder,one winger, two centre forward with one as a winger) and it didn't work. why oh why did grunt try these similar formation. everything he does always try to make a statement that he is better than jose. throw a cup of tea or break a table to fired up players? i think the players will ignore or laugh at those tea cups and table that he broke!!

just like the game vs rosenborg at home. the rich people seem didnt care to watch that game as it is low key game while the passionate working class were being priced out?

i thought kenyon talked about hiring another manager :huh: ...

sorry, i had misunderstood your intention but i think the players already know that what kind of situation that roman had put them into when he hired grunt. by judging on his reaction, i do believe that a.cole is kinda pissed off or sullking when he was told to give the armband to drogba. jose had done the public comments on joe cole but he added up with some honesty, about j.cole's show boating, didnt help the team to defend etc so that the player could learn from his mistake. while avram just claimed that drogba is a leader, not on how bad a.cole had been performing that day. unfortunately, joe cole has become his former self, after mourinho had gone. grunt has called himself a ordinary one, an attractive football merchant, a person who know to handle big ego, a motivator etc but the only none is true. he is not ordinary, he is an ignorant.

to who ever seem to back grunt, the point is avram's man management skills is a fart, and is does shows. it is not about how the papers try to dramatise this situation

if he want a chance to stick two fingers in roman and avram face, he will go there.

it is not about who done it. avram just showed us what an idiot he is in term of man management. a normal person will get pissed off or disheartened or feel being back-stabbed either in football or in other occupation. the compilation of avram's foolishness in club football management is getting thicker and thicker every week. please any roman advisor, please coax roman to sack avram it start to effect the result. btw there is no attractive football to roman's liking.

i think you are the one who try to twisting words here. the Chelsea official webpage also stated the same as, unfortunately, what the sun had written. and still he didnt mention who was giving those rollicking. only the writer of the article said so. read this article if you dont believe me. http ://www.chelseafc.com/xxchelsea180706/i...2209129_18 so whoever give the half time talk is still a question..

i didnt believe the official site 100%. always look at the bright side. there is a thick line on being honest and being positive.

thats not what ballack said on tv. maybe in your head he said grant did but all of us saw live on tv and read what ballack said is 'it was loud in the dressing room during half time'. we didnt say he was grunting or whatever. it is a FACT, not a word twisting, misleading or whatever.