herzogian

Why? He clearly was tired from the effort on Sunday. And yes he had a moderately shitty game... hence his substitution. Nough said me thinks, on to the next one. Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

So you are saying that KDB only plays good when his team is winning? [emoji51] Honestly, I don't perceive a difference in how much both players influence their teams performance. Both KDB and Hazard are capable of winning the match for their team, it's what makes them special. Both KDB and Hazard have a tendency to fade away in some games (like any normal player would), it's what proves they are human. Only real differences are their style of play and of course the fact that KDB plays in a team with more quality on the pitch. Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

This could become embarrassing, but at least it's not Bournemouth eh... Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Alonsooooo what a player II Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

And here I was thinking that we were looking good those first few minutes[emoji25] Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Alonsooooooooooo, what a player! Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Lol, getting worked up by an article in a tabloid paper in which an obscure source claims that something happened blablabla... Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Don't think that was on Emerson though. We tried him against spurs too and he was good. Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Aaaargh, why is Alonslow back on again?! Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

When does the comeback start? Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Who is this Emerson? He is quite good... Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Sarri had some early succes and his influence was quite clear in the beginning of the season. Now he's just being stubborn and he doesn't seem to have the creativity to handle with the situation. Still I wouldn't completely write him off. We're still fourth, I still think he can turn this around. Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Sarri really has to stop playing Hazard up front. Since he's back on he's normal position he's been more dangerous. Alas much too late. If Hig is the only way Sarri will get Eden back to lw, he'd beter get here quickly. Verstuurd vanaf mijn ANE-LX1 met Tapatalk

Salah is doing it on regular basis? Salah was shit and ineffective till november. He had one wonder season that he'll never repeat again. Eden was unplayable till the injury aginst ManU and he's slowly regaining his form. Even when out of form he made some valuable assists. Apart from one season he has constantly been our best player and arguably one of the top three players in the PA for 5-6 years. And people complain about his regularity…. What has Salah done the last six years, apart from his wonder season? Eden or Salah… I would definitely pick the former. Concerning the Madrid rumours. Who cares? He has a hard time making a decision; his children grew up here en he has settled in London but on the other hand Real Madrid has been his dream since he was a child. I find it quite understandable that he's keeping his options open till the summer. The media is the media and they will make a mountain from a molehill everytime they can, don't get caught up in that. Amid all the rumours and insecurity one thing is for certain; he'll stay till the end of the season. So, let's enjoy it while we still can.

While I can't deny Luiz being a total berk in defense, I don't really get the despise/poison part nor why Willian and Luiz would be worse than other "dead wood" in the squad. They are just footballers who aren't performing and -certainly in the case of Luiz- should be left on the bench or sold. Don't really get why you have to be so toxic about it... BTW: The Luizpanel in this weeks Squires couldn't be more accurate https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2018/nov/27/david-squires-on-superclasico-chaos-and-other-football-soap-operas

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/25/roman-abramovich-posed-threat-to-public-security-swiss-police-said

Mhm yes, but first of all I still don't see any proof of those "facts" except for the reporting in those papers. And secondly by using terms like 'AWOL' and saying that 'he claims' you're implying that Willian is absent from training on purpose. Buying into the whole 'Willian wants to force a move'-narrative the tabloids are promoting right now. All I'm saying is be more critical and have more patience.

Jeez, don't state it like it is a fact. The Sun or the Times claim it but where's the proof? Oh well, it's propably a result of the slow news regarding transfers. People are getting restless and are cluthing at straws in there search for information. The straws being all the non-news, rumours etc. on the internet. The sad thing is that most people know this but are still making assumptions based on the drivel you find on the internet. Que sera, sera...

Ah, the old Belgium card, used by those who are bereft of any solid argument and are desperately clutching to have the last word.

Glad you at least seem to acknowledge your own irrationality, less work pointing it out...

Finally it's over, though this is just the beginning. The team still have a lot of work ahead in trying to clean up this mess and finding their mojo back. Now that Mou's gone I am still afraid of him though. Being an extreme narcissist he'll propably spout some venemous remarks, singling out players etc... His spectre will haunt the team for a while like a stuborn stain in the carpet. We need an exorcist.

De gustibus non est disputandum. I think she's quite the looker. And Mourinho should go, obviously...

Debunked: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/11/16/everything-the-internet-hoax-machine-tricked-you-into-believing-about-paris/ It's sad enough that extreme right groups are using the Paris attacks to fuel their political agenda. Really don't need conspiracy nutters claiming it is a false flag etc... Some are even claiming that nobody died and nobody was wounded which says enough about how deluded these people are:http://nodisinfo.com/the-fake-dead-and-wounded-of-the-paris-france-terror-attack-hoax/ Some may argue that these childish hoax theories ala Alex Jones aren't harmful but sadly this is not the case. Many people fall for this complete and utter nonsense. It's allready hard enough to see the wood for the trees trying to analyse regular media. There's of course freedom of information on the internet and this has its advantages but also major disadvantages, disinformation in any form can be dangerous. Sometimes, just sometimes, I wish the internet was subject to a Stalinist stystem where such deluded nonsense could be wiped out in a second. I know of course that this would be even worse but

While I am all for the humanistic approach etc I. just would like to point out that the "optimism" concerning the enlightenment also existed in the 19th century but was completely shattered after the two world wars. A lot of people shared the optimism that through science and rational thought we could achieve to create a true utopia. Sadly the reality turned out to be horribly different.The idea that progress of science automatically makes humanity better has been exposed as poppycock. Besides all the wonderfull things we got through scientific 'progress', it also brought us automatic rifles, biochemic weapons and atomic bombs which are keeping the world in a weird stranglehold right now. Also, concerning rational thought, there are problems cause there isn't just 'one' rational thought. The Nazi's thought they where very rational when they ordred the endlösung. Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest was hijacked by the Nazi's and used to legitimize the extermination of many people who where considred lesser beings. There was a very rational approach in explaining why these people where different and how they should be killed, and it was accepted by a lot of people whom you propably would classify as rational. Just like science, rationality is subject to our limitations as human beings. This tackles one of the early principles of the enlightenment: that humans are good and rational by nature. Which,sadly, is not the case and which, again sadly, makes "the enlightenment-project" a lot harder. Don't misunderstand me, I too think that the ideas of the enlightenment are propably the most useful and trustworthy in trying to reach 'a better world' but we may never forget what happened in the 20th century. If we forget that dark note the 'way of enlightenment' will only lead to darkness. ( Apologies for the pathos in the last sentence)

Don't wanna be a pedantic a-hole but homo sapien first appeared 200000 years ago.Know your prehistoric history young padawan.Concerning religion, you have to make a difference between spirituality (ritualistic behaviour)religion and organised religion.The last one came into being after the neolithic revolution 10000 years ago.