

dimmas
MemberEverything posted by dimmas
-
Double post
-
Someone who can play in tight spaces and has excellent technique to execute precise passes and take shots would be brilliant for our team, especially since we'll likely have many games with a lot of possession. Imagining players like Grealish or James Madison would be great (or atleast very interesting) to play in our squad. But are there no players like that realistic in the market anymore? Has the Bernardo Silva rumor also faded away? He's likely to stay at City now, right? And now our transfer rumors revolve around young and young player again, some of them maybe highly talented but really unproven
-
I think sub chilwell out is bit a mistake Poch trust mudryk to give more offensive display on the left, while also keep providing width. But Mudryk has been very poor on his general movement, and his awkward combination on build up play. And that's really effect our general play.
-
Mudryk, not this kind of performance again I think we should loan him out Mudryk such a really weird player, with all the talent, the pace and the flair that he has. He has some weird vibes, who will doing weird and bit stupid decision. His general play is so bizzare. The movements and how he use his technique. And don't need to say much about his decision making. Back then, before he came here, he only play against midget and arguably in very poor league. Make him look really behind on his maturity and how he use his tool. I say it again, probably the one who need loan is actually mudryk. He really need some time to impose himself.
-
One thing I actually fear is, "Is he really that good?" When a certain player's actual value is only around 60-70 million, but someone paid him not just 100m, but even broke another British record transfer fee, it's actually madness. If he doesn't perform in very high level, this signing will be underwhelming.
-
Why isn't Verratti included in Enrique's plans tho? And if any of that is actually true, we should try to get him. I mean imagining addition of verrati + one DM, probably something too much to ask for
-
And after Spurs received that £100m, do you think there is a possibility of them trying to get Vlahovic? And it's also make Juve will have enough funds to buy Lukaku, so they could acquire him without having to make a player trade plus fee. It's a win-win situation for us as well. But the question is, is it Vlahovic even want to play at spurs?
-
Hm what? If a striker has good link-up play, suddenly that player becomes a good choice to play the number 10 role? Where does that kind of logic come from? Don't forget that by using him in the number 10 role, you could also take away several primary strengths of that striker – explosiveness, positioning, timing of runs, goal-scoring instinct, etc.
-
Getting vlahovic right now is like jeopardize anything that poch try to build so far with this team, betrayed another young, hunger, show a lot of promise and well in form striker on jackson. Bring unnecessry problem to this team. It is bad the thing. Please no
-
Don't forget we are the club without a CL campaign next year. Anything implying that Mbappe would play at the club without CL is just nothing but delusional. And even with UCL, why would Mbappe want to come here? It's like he didn't get many super tempting offers, ridiculously massive wage, and very promising project from any other elite clubs in Europe
-
True, Humphrey looked good – a real prospect. For me, he looks much better than Chalobah. Shame Humphrey will not get actual chances to prove himself here. And ironically, Chalobah is the one who has a lower ceiling/less talent but gets so many chances to show his actual capabilities in the first team. Even though Disasi looks great already, there are some mixed feelings about this transfer; it's like a slap in Humphrey's face when the club suddenly just splashes a big fee for another really talented CB. If everything goes well, it will lock one spot for our starting CB for a long time. Buying Disasi means fewer chances for young CBs as promising as Humphreys to break into the first team, and probably it also reduces the number of appearances for Colwill as well
-
I am actually okay with only them being signed. Kudus probably isn't the best option, but he is a good young forward with real talent, a really good athlete, technically promising, and capable of scoring as well. As for Lavia, I don't know if there is any other better alternative to Caicedo. Am I the only one who really likes him because partnering him with Enzo means there is someone who can and is really capable of focusing more on our defensive side in the midfield area? Lavia also doesn't seem technically awful; he seems promising or decent to help move the ball forward in the transition phase, and he is fast and strong, which is a valuable asset for me as well.
-
can we send Sterling for giving more variety to Patrick Viera instead?
-
Yesterday, i just watched one compilation that compare madueke and angelo. I like, hmm wow this kid actually look so so good, but is it just because this is just clip/compilation that makes him looks much better than he actually is. But after i watch his performance today, i get more convinced by him, his raw potential is so promising. Angelo is so tidy on the ball, there's some flair, creativity, pace and vision What a young player. Poch should give much focus on developing him And now, i didn't really like the idea about the potential of having Kudus. Buying him only regressed Angelo minutes in our first team, it should be sterling who got the less minutes, but you know what will be happen if we buy kudus with relatively high price
-
Several good team movement and link up play. Like some moments from santos, angelo and casedei, usually our midfiled seem too passive and static Not mean much, and the opponent could be showing poor display, but really like to see some kind of team dynamics after a very long time. We were so inconsistent and dire to watch when needed to attack as a team in many matches across several seasons. Hopefully, this is something we can build on and continue to improve
-
Even a youth striker as promising as DD Fonfana cannot get a sniff at our first team, like he wasted his own potential by coming here at a very young age. Personally, I am really excited by his skillset; he is fast, strong, technically decent on the ball, and probably still could be improve. And he has already shown great promise at the youth level. It's hard to believe that both Potter and Lampard preferred to give numerous cameo appearances to Aubameyang rather than to Fonfana. In some games, I even preferred him to play than Havertz, who often appears invisible as a striker or false nine, with awkward and poor displays leading our front line. And for sure, Fonfana still has a lot of time ahead of him, but it could be said that his chances here will likely be determined by this upcoming loan. It will decide whether he can make it or not. 🥲
-
How about barella as our versatile midfielder/CM and lavia for pure DM. A man can dream. Both will be cost a lot, probably around 75m+45m, but it will be worth the money
-
Gosh I'm sorry, i mean dimitry payet. Cherky style of play reminds me a bit of him. Not quick lightning, but with good vision, gifted technicality, really good of low centre of gravity, football brain, creativity, comfortable with ball on his feet, someone who actually bit slow but if he can keep improving those aspects he still can shine in premier league
-
Actually for me, compare him to chilwell, doesn't mean much since chilwell also give so many medicore performance, even without last season disaster form
-
What book? And which aspect or part of that book make you feel that, may you give some example
-
Absolutely true. Need to consider our current squad especially in midfield area is very young, i think we really should get atleast one experience midfielder. And Barella would be brilliant signing And what about cherky rumours? just seem very quiet recently. some people said he is bit slow, but cherky reminds me a bit of gustavo payet, he didn't really fast either, but still capable of doing something great in pl, right. If cherky could be our own payet, it will be very great. We desperately need this kind of player in our attack. If not cherky, wirtz, bernando also still decent option Imagine we could land barella, dybala, cherky, lavia and veiga I think the squad will be very promising and exciting for the upcoming season, even without marquee signing like caicedo
-
true, is actually that impossible to push very hard for Barella, even around 70-75 million? Barella could be very awesome addition to our midfield, like a dream player. Barella is a unique, he is a workhorse with a lot of quality on the ball. Just imagine Enzo and Barella playing together in the same team. Just wow And if you combine that with an agile, combative, hardworking defensive midfielder like Lavia, our midfield setup would be even more formidable and incredibly competitive to any other midfield. Picture in our mind some possible midfield lineup like this: Enzo - Barella Lavia Add it with some youngsters (that still have some future here )like Chukwuemeka, Casedei, and Santos as backup options, our midfield would be incredibly exciting.
-
To be honest, I hardly understand what Arsenal saw in Havertz. Maybe I'm one of the person who don't rate him highly based on what I have seen from him in the past 2-3 years. Could he perform better and have much better stats in a much better attacking team or with a certain style of play? Yes, that is something that could still happen. But can Havertz transform his game and become a completely different player than what he has shown with us? I hardly believe that. I mean, it's like saying that after Jorginho moves to Arsenal, he could become stronger physically, have quicker feet, better dribbler, capable of keeping the ball under pressure in much more consistently, and provide much better threat and become strong combative player as midfielder. I mean, by playing in a more suitable system with better teammates, someone could perform better and become a more functional player. But when the issue lies in the player's lack of skills and attributes (or in havertz case also his sluggish style of play and often being invisible), I hardly believe that. The same thing also applies to the case of Sterling. He had much better performances and numbers when playing in the City team, but we have already seen what he lacks from his City days, and it just becomes more apparent in a worse functioning team.
-
🙄Genuinely i don't really understand why he moved to Saudi Arabia this year. Though some people have said that he is currently injury prone and cannot deliver the same level of performance as he used to, I still think he has a few years left to play in highest level for an elite European team, such as Milan, Inter, or even PSG. I mean, playing in Saudi Arabia seems like he has already given up on football 🙄 he doesn't care anymore and he just wants to collect a huge amount of money. It seems ironic that this is happening to Kante, who is known as a very modest player compare to most footballer 😅
-
Our best player? It's not the same case as prime fabregas (at that time) moving to another big team or a direct rival. The difference is that Arsenal sold their supreme player to another big team where he was one of their best performers. The same cannot be said for Mount and Kovacic. First and foremost, they are underperforming players here. After numerous seasons, we have already seen enough to know that they hardly reach a higher ceiling here and don't really make a significant impact due to their obvious limitations. While they may have occasional better performances here and there due to having a much better system and better teammates, I'm not confident that they can truly transform into much better players. They hardly change. One of the reasons why they have a high number of appearances here is that we didn't have a better option, so we had to field decent players who are actually inconsistent and not quite enough to make us title contenders. With that being said, I'm actually happy to see one of them keep playing here, but if selling them means we could form a better team with more suitable and better players, I prefer the latter option.