OhForAGreavsie

Excellent tweet. Either a man of sense or a communications department that's really on the ball. If the latter then I don't care if that communication department works at CFC or with his agent. It would just be nice to know that at least one of our players is getting that kind of quality support.

So many weaknesses but, for me, the worst is how closed he is when receiving an out ball. With such body shape there is only one way the ball is going next; back in the direction it came from.

I have never understood why any Chelsea fan would ever call a Chelsea player Shit. (As was done in the post to which you replied.) Not even Chris Sutton got that from me and believe me, I never knew how furious I could get until the day we signed him. The reality is, despite the goals, Tammy is not the answer for us up front. My statement might be softened if I said that he isn't the answer 'at the moment', but, from his academy days on, I've never believed. I did not, and do not, believe that Tammy would help us become the team we want to be. I won't therefore hide behind well meaning words now. Perhaps there's a role for Tammy as one of our squad options. Not sure that he would, or should, want that role though.

Thanks for persevering. More than my comment deserved. It was a typo. Far from the first time that's happened, and damaged the sense of a post of mine. The last time one was brought to my attention, the person to whom I gave my explanation chose not to believe me. No problem we all call life the way we see it though we should all accept the responsibility to keep ensuring that we see straight. The post should read I don't love what Rudi did. Though the Corinthian spirt died long ago, and the pragmatic approach of ensuring that the referee sees fouls committed against you is here to stay, I just felt Rudi went a bit further than absolutely required in his reaction to Son's foul. Merry Christmas to everyone celebrating it today.

You're right, It's a fair sized if.

I did not live what Rudi did.

I did not live what Rudi did.

I haven't seen Coutinho in Germany. Is he doing as well as reports suggest? I ask because Dembele looked fully worth the fee Barcelona paid while he was a Bundesliga player. I wonder if that factor is significant when considering Sancho's true value.

I agree that it would be a good move, especially it Southampton could offer minutes to Marc. Only concern is whether it is safe for us to let him go, numericaly speaking. His loan would leave us with four specialist centre backs. Is that enough the day after 3 at the back has again shown itself to be a really useful option for us? We do have Reece and Dave who could share the right back/spare centre back role.

I don't believe Jesus is in the top quality bracket. I'm on record as having said I don't believe he will succeed Aguero when the Argentine leaves. I think City will be looking for a better alternative.

Overpaid Calum and set an unrealistic precedent? At one point the offer to Calum was reported to be £9m a year. Later reports put it at £5m a year. Both numbers are too high, one of them obscenely so.

How does today's rumour about Saul Niguez play into this? Do you believe it's true that Atleti want to sell and are prepared to do business at less than his buyout? If so should buyers be on guard?

Highlights of the win against Man City which should be viewable everywhere: -

Got to laugh.

The FA Women's Super League is, as expected, shaping up to be a three horse race between Arsenal, Man City & Chelsea. The head-to-head clashes among the big three are therefore crucial. Good then that The Blues were victorious in this afternoon's meeting with City. The come from behind 2-1 win exactly matches the result we achieved against Arsenal. We leapfrog City into secod place, two points behind Arsenal but we have a game in hand on both of our rivals. Highlights in this BBC page. (May be viewable in the UK only):- https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50686369 Our goals (Should be viewable wherever you are): - Official report: - https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2019/12/08/women-s-report--chelsea-2-man-city-1?cardIndex=0-0&fbclid=IwAR2e9lECMh0SslidheKPGJ6ZDrzLICi3QY0LZAdtqvmDwC-YbbF3qxq-INg

Correct of course but nothing to prevent us simply making a binding agreeing to sign a player after what would have been the end of the transfer ban. Technically different to a buy and loan back, but effectively the same.

I suspect that are are rules in the articles of association The FA signs with fufa on behalf of its affiliated clubs that would prevent such action. When the charge was first made I did a post stating my belief that, if there was not such a regulation, fufa's lawyers would not allow them to impose the ban until any appeal had been heard because loosing the appeal might then cost fufa tens, if not hundreds, of millions of pounds in compensation.

The statement makes me wonder how the CAS would have ruled had we asked for a stay on the ban. I felt all along, even up to today, that the ban would be overturned altogether and not just reduced. This was not based on any evidence, but only on the belief that we could not be so stupid as to get caught doing something we had been warned about before. I wonder if the fact that we had already served the first half of the ban allowed the CAS to take the easy option and reduce it, rather than set it aside altogether. fufa's behaviour in this causes me to believe that there are some unintelligent people making decisions there. People whose intellect is not sufficient to control their emotions. They hate us, they buy into the enemy of football lie, and are determined to find a way to single us out. We may have let them off the hook by failing to ask for the ban to be stayed while the appeal ran its course.

I really, really, can't stand fufa.

Well, if City are prepared to let him join us that will tell its own tale anyway I suppose.

I agree about Chillwell, lot's of issues getting that done. If he should eventually go to City however, I'd look at taking Angelino as an alternative. Meanwhile, is Barcelona Dembele in the same, 'big factor at his club'. category and would people here look seriously at him? I was desperate to try to get him during the season he was keeping Jeremie Boga out of the Rennes team. if his agent is to be believed, he turned us down back then. If true, then my guess is that concerns about being condemned to the loan army played a part in that decision, but that fear has probably gone away now. Do people still see him an elite player, and should we push for him?

If your friend is right, and De Virj is their best defender, then why wouldn't they say no to an offer? Is it the case that they just have to bring in money no matter what?

We do have positions requiring upgrade so, if we can find the players to achieve that, let's get it done. This is not an emergency situation however. Let's treat this as a page turned and a chapter closed. We have 'squad' players by the bucket load. If we go to the market it must be for quality only. If we can't get recruits with top level technical quality, plus the required positional abilities and physical attributes, then we stick with what we have. Shop for excellence, or don't shop at all.

Looking every inch a man who believes his own hype tonight. Trying to do more than he looks capable of achieving at the moment.

When it comes to the quality element of our team, Kova is at the very heart of it. He may only have signed a few months ago but extend his contract now please Blues.