The comments on here about Costa's step on Can's leg make me lose faith in a jury based justice system. Alot of people just don't seem to have any idea what constitutes 'proof' and 'clear intent' when i read people on here stating things like: "it's obviously clear when you look at the video he intended to 'stamp' on the leg" It just isn't. The only thing that video is proof of, is the fact that Costa is not that nice guy who goes out of his way to make sure he doesnt step on somebody by accident (AND THAT IS A BIG DIFFERENCE) And if i knew how to post a youtube video i would have posted that famous Randall badger video: 'He just doesn't give a shit'