Jump to content

Chelsea Announces Annual Profit


Peppen
 Share

Recommended Posts

All Three Maestros are making less than £90,000 p/w, Oscar having the smallest wage out of the three players and Hazard the highest.

Hazard is not making over £100,000 p/w

I don't know about Marin but I doubt it's more than £50,000 p/w

Are you sure about it? Because as stated above, there is lot of confusion but no one has said that it's below 100k.Everyone has said it's over 100. I am pretty sure it's not 170 as the English media put it but could be what french sources say. And if it is less than 100, it's a brilliant deal by our board TBH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you sure about it? Because as stated above, there is lot of confusion but no one has said that it's below 100k.Everyone has said it's over 100. I am pretty sure it's not 170 as the English media put it but could be what french sources say. And if it is less than 100, it's a brilliant deal by our board TBH.

That doesn't make sense but if it's quoted than I'm wrong - strange that Mata is making around the same as Cahill and Oscar is even less than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't make sense but if it's quoted than I'm wrong - strange that Mata is making around the same as Cahill and Oscar is even less than that.

Yes. I was quite surprised by that too. But even after all Mata has done for chelsea since joining us, there is even more man love that i have for this guy when i cane to know he earns below average(for a star performer of the team).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Im pretty sure the accountants will find a way. I just can't see them wanting to go back in minus since the club came out in a plus last time.

Of course they dont want to, but what are they going to do? SHIT MONEY?

Maybe 70mi was too much, but we will certainly lose 40-50mi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The club's profit was so small, if you take away CL prize money, we would have been in serious minus. This year even more, because Europa League doesn't pay that good.

Not to mention that we only made a profit because of accounting trickery last season. They claimed a profit of 28.8 M in transfers but that is only due to staggering the payments. They actually spent more money on players than they received which means that Chelsea will be paying significant money for transfers from last season for a few years yet. It's impossible to tell how much Chelsea will lose because we don't know how much they'll spend yet. It could be a 30-40M loss or, if we spend big, it could be up there with City's losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premier League clubs occupied three of the top eight places in the revenue list, with Manchester United earning €35.182m despite going out in the group stages. Chelsea topped The list with €59.95. So thats a difference of €25m.

So I expect us to earn half of what we earned last season. Not bad Imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You