Jump to content

Term-X

Member
  • Posts

    10,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62
  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by Term-X

  1. Not to the extremes of some of the past Chelsea badges. The changes from our 1986-05 badge and the current one is drastic. United's has been the same since the 60's, & Real Madrid's has been the same since the 1930's, and both have only had minor changes. You are underestimating the amount of thought that went into the current badge. At the time Peter Kenyon was changing this club into a brand, and the same business practises will remain as long as we're competitive and selling shirts in god knows where. Nike & Adidas don't drastically change their logo every 10 year or so, and neither do top clubs who know the importance of brand identity.
  2. The current badge was created during Peter Kenyon’s reign so expect it to remain forever. It was designed to be future proof, United have a strong identifiable brand (Peter Kenyon/Ron Gourlay know this all too well), same for Barca & Real Madrid.
  3. The current badge is perfect. Just because in the past the badge has changed a few times doesn't mean it will ever change again. The yellow doesn't look right btw, it's not bold enough. The only reason it was ever used was because of the centenary in 2005.
  4. He should be open to whatever Carlo wants of him. It was only 2 weeks ago he said certain players don't deserve to play.. What the fuck gives him the right to say that? He's in no position to be insisting upon certain formations.
  5. What formation we play is up to Carlo, not Kalou and his media manipulation. It was only 2 weeks ago he was saying other players don't deserve to play, What gives him the right to say that?.. Carlo picks the team, not Kalou.
  6. Deluded Egomaniac Kalou demands Carlo play 433 http://www.dailymail...-continues.html No player has the right to undermine the manager like that, this is the 2nd time in just a few weeks Kalou has spoken out to the press with his 'demands'.
  7. They were decided back in January. Still bollocks though.
  8. English stadiums should be close to the pitch, Olympic style stadiums have no personality.
  9. It's not the best forum on the net, but it's the best Chelsea forum, no doubt.
  10. I remember last year I won most controversial. I'd say overall, I've toned it down a bit this year, which is a good thing. Although me & badboy are the true originals, the newbies are just imitations. "The imitation is always worse than the original" __Jose' Mourinho
  11. Roman Abramovich is Chelsea's problem as well as the solution http://www.guardian....+%28Football%29 ^ one of the responses to the article, lmao
  12. What are you on about? I think you've missed the point here, even though I made it crystal clear. Which was, if your 3-1 up at half time against a team like west brom, you let Torres have a good 20+ minutes (at least) to get a much needed goal, which will benefit not only him but the entire team. It's was the perfect opportunity.
  13. ^ Lmao, holding what looks to be an emtpy bottle.
  14. So do you. By the end of the season they will be there or thereabouts. They have played 1 more game than 14th place Birmingham, and are just 5 points ahead of wigan FFS.
  15. I've already explained my reasoning, I don't need to repeat myself. And LMAO, take a look at the table... they've played 1 more game than the rest of the relegation fodder. They will be there or thereabouts at the end of the season.
  16. Yes, and this was against relegation fodder and we were 3-1 up with 45 minutes to go. = Perfect Opportunity. Yet Carlo gives him only 9 minutes....
  17. With 45 minutes to go, we were 3-1 up against relegation fodder... Carlo decided to give him just 9 minutes out of a possibly 45. Fail.
  18. 3-1 up against relegation fodder (with plenty of time left), gave Carlo a perfect opportunity to give Torres a much needed goal. Like I said, a 27 year old investment getting a much needed goal, is more important than a 33 year old playing well against relegation fodder.
  19. Yea, because a 27 year old investment, who of which needs a goal, is less important than a 33 year old playing well against relegation fodder.
  20. Shame on Carlo for only giving him 9 minutes. Jesus christ... We were winning 3-1 for fuck sake.
  21. No, he hasn't. In fact he recently came out and said it was all lies.
  22. Carlo humiliating Torres with only 9 minutes. Giving the media & liverpool fans yet another game to add to his record.
×
×
  • Create New...