Stingray

Now that shit cracked me up!

Me too, i missed @rmpr !

Yup, yup! That's us!

I am for sale :-)

My garden! Eat that :-)

and Torres :-)

I'll andwer when I get back from work :-) Ps: I am out of likes so couldnt like your post, sorry causeitis good! Ps2: never said I was a psych:-) I graduated in philosophy actually but did and do my phd research in the crossvsevtion of philosophy and psychology. So yeah, I love that shit :-)

Ill read it tomorrow then my philosopher friend!

Ow you silly postmodernist! Lol! Thou shallt not drag me into an objectivist/subjectivist debate on a football forum! People already hate me for the memes. Go figure how popular i'd be once we hit quantumphysics or qualia in the debate :-) lmao! Edit: shit! I cant resist! Objectivity in my sense refers to a 'taste of the pudding is in the eating' definition of truth (correspondance idea instead of identity idea). So, the matter on who is best will be one to be determined after the eating . After their careers so to speak, not because a lot of forum members think it is true NOW :-) lol!! Commit that to the flames as Hume would say. Uch opinions contain nothing but sophistry ... Ps: you are evil, @choulo19 !

Nice!! You know your Kant on intersubjectivity! Awesome, respect for that!! True, i have more of a positivist approach on the matter. Hence the confusion. Why ... Because of Hitler for example. So many people voted or him, did that make him say objective things? Numerous examples apply, but I forgive Kant. He lived in his own time frame and philosophy has moved on quite a bit :-) Again: respect!

Thing you put them titties in zola

Nah, i think Kagawa is a really good footballer, mate. Truly! I was referring to: "But I can tell you one thing : if you people had watched Dortmund when Shinji was playing there, you'd think twice before saying Eden is obviously better than Kagawa. For instance, I still did not have seen the belgian making an as big performance as Kagawa when the Borussia beat Munich 5-1" Which to me is: 1. Comparative remark, which you find childish, hence the joke I made :-) 2. An interpretation, and I refer to the latter part of the comment. So, to conclude: I don't see the issue with my remark. Tagging it as objective makes it fact. This is not what it is if you look at their stats.

Yeah, the ladies are at it tonight!!!

They can loan Torres for this game then :-)

There is nothing objective about this. It is an interpretation. Don't forget. Hazard was brilliant at Lille too, see the stats, awards, games. Also, he ripped Liverpool a nice new arse as well. So .... Interpretation, point of view and context. Objective would be such a hyperbole imo.

Me and @rmpr could just fill it up with memes, perhaps then? Lol!

Why not. The second part of the post was actually a comparison in itself :-) i found that quite funny. Contradictio in terminis.

Shhhhhht don't tell the herd me, you, Rmpr and Dionsa do the nasty together :-)

You must be belgian to dare say such a thing, mate! Lol!

Fact remains we DID NOT! Saying so is a blatant lie. Period.

Ow reaaaally ? Close but no cigar, lol :-)Ps: only my wife knows how big my calibre is, you don't :-)

3 out of 11 votes come from Belgians. Your argument is invalid and full of it. Do you get off on these overgeneralisations, perhaps? You just gave us a look in your agenda with that post. Sorry to say, but i actually - as a belgian - feel very much offended by your posts in this style. Labelling a (ethnic/cultural) group of people in a derogatory manner has name, you know ... Bias much yourself maybe?

Some serious underestimating going on here. This is a sturdy team and mentality wise they can give us a few lessons. If we go in without our heads on right, they will screw us over, no doubt.

I don't think thats true, actually - looking back at the Lukaku, Kdb, Courtois, Hazard threads. It is true that Hazard sparked some ferocious debate - it went beserk over there a while ago. But .... He is also really good and got attacked for extra-sportive reasons. Is defending a player because you think he is criticized for the wrong reasons being biased, then? Or is it mainstream on here to just fuck over players all the time because it makes you look 'critical', wise and intelligent? My bet is on the latter, mate! Cheers.